THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT
[18 April 2003]
by Michael Weinreb
Tony Siragusa
Toni Smith
|
e-mail this article
The most shocking thing I saw at the movies last year appeared during the
credits to Spike Lee's The 25th Hour, where I learned that Tony Siragusa, a former NFL nose tackle, played the Russian gangster character -- a
mound of flesh known as Kostya Novotny.
Now, this is not normally the sort of fact that should frame one's entire
perspective on sports. But here's the thing: Siragusa is a good actor. He
was so good that I didn't even recognize him, and I should have, because
Siragusa had made his reputation as an actor on one of my favorite reality
television shows of all-time: HBO's Hard Knocks, a series about the
preseason antics of the 2001 Baltimore Ravens (with a second season focusing
on the Dallas Cowboys). Hard Knocks was a documentary, but Siragusa
played his role in the same way Puck played his role on the Real
World -- he was bully, a wise ass, a prankster, and he spouted some of the
best one-liners in an NFL uniform since legendary quipster Art Donovan
retired. He may have been acting, or he may truly be a big fat idiot, but
either way, Siragusa prefigured his 25th Hour, performance. He is a
born entertainer.
So what does this have to do with Toni Smith, a women's basketball player at
Manhattanville College in Purchase, New York, whose policy of turning her
back during the playing of the Star-Spangled Banner has turned her
into a social misfit? What's truly remarkable is that, as far as I can
tell, Smith doesn't even appear to be acting. This may, in fact, be an
actual protest by an actual person, someone who has no endorsement potential
and no public image and isn't (we assume) doing this to ensure herself a
role in Spike Lee's next joint. And that Smith has convinced us of that
makes her story as compelling as anything that will ever be shown on Hard
Knocks. This is damn good entertainment, and this is what crusty
sportswriters like Gil LeBreton will never understand.
LeBreton, who writes for the Fort-Worth Star Telegram, recently
called Smith a "confused adolescent brat" who's trying to "draw attention."
Fine. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that's true. Let's just imagine
that Smith is pulling an Ed Norton-Primal Fear switcheroo simply in
order to piss off crusty Texas sportswriters. Well, then, let me be the
first to say: who cares?
People like LeBreton are saying athletes should be entertainers, nothing
more, right? But that's not the only parameter. Not if you read the sports
pages on a regular basis. The prevailing view is that athletes should be
entertainers unless they try too hard to entertain us, unless they
treat it too much like a game. Unless, that is, they showboat, or
unless they dance, or unless they proclaim themselves the King of Siam to a
room full of reporters. Witness the fate of Terrell Owens, recently and
roundly lambasted for touchdown celebrations in which he autographed a
football and danced with pom-poms. Whether or not Owens really is a jerk,
he's doing his job as well as anyone in the National Football League, and I
don't just mean as a receiver, though that's true, too. That moment last
season when Owens yanked a Sharpie out of his sock and signed the ball for a
fan will be one of the few moments they'll still be replaying on
ESPN's NFL Films reruns in 2135, right between cage matches involving
supermodels and great-white sharks.
Here's the thing: Owens' flourishes didn't hurt anybody. And there, and only
there, is where I draw the line. Should he serve as an example to the
nation's Pop Warner superstars? Of course not, but neither should Tiger
Woods' dirty jokes or Michael Jordan's divorce.
We simplify personalities in sports. And that's part of what makes it so
much fun, isn't it? Good guys and bad guys are part of the game. And even
though it may not seem like it, even though it might as well be the polar
opposite of the Sharpie Incident, Toni Smith's stand is part of the game, as
well. Both are extreme, both are daring, and both are damn good
entertainment, and isn't that why we watch sports in the first place?
(Unless I'm wrong, and we're just there for the national anthem.)
I don't know about you, but I don't want my athletes to act like foot
soldiers. I have foot soldiers to do that nowadays. I want my athletes
with personality. I want them to draw attention. I want heroes and
villains. I want a subtext that frames the actual event. I grew up a fan
of the straight-laced Penn State football program, where showboating is
punishable offense, but the truth is, if Penn State didn't have renegade
programs like Miami and Oklahoma as a foil, it wouldn't have been much fun
at all to root for anybody. The 1987 Fiesta Bowl between Penn State and
Miami was the closest thing to a John Wayne movie that college football has
ever seen.
And so I want it all. I want my Rickey Hendersons and I want my Warren
Sapps and I want my Mike Tysons threatening to swallow small children, as
long as they don't actually swallow said children, as long as I have my
Grant Hills and Priest Holmes and Curt Schillings playing chess and visiting
hospitals full of cancer patients to make me feel balanced. I want extreme
behavior, be it Toni Smith's political stand or Shaquille O'Neal's racist
babble about Yao Ming. I want Bob Knight throwing chairs and I want Mark
Cuban bursting onto a basketball court like a primate in an oversized
jersey. I want David Wells getting his ass kicked in Manhattan diners at 4
in the morning, and I want Joe Torre handling the whole thing with way too
much class. I want Barry Zito, the kooky Oakland A's pitcher, who recently
told the New York Times, "I refuse to be molded into some
stereotypical ballplayer that has no interests, really, no life, no depth,
no intelligence."
I mean, what exactly are the rules here? Is it OK for a goof like Tony
Siragusa to break the mold, but not for Toni Smith? If that's what we're
saying, screw the game. I'm going to the movies.
18 April 2003