Who Needs Batman?
While the men of Batman: The Animated Series
were busy brooding over their personal conflicts and
crusades, the female characters came into their own.
And it soon became clear that the feisty Batgirl,
seductive Poison Ivy, elegant Catwoman, and ditzy
Harley Quinn are far more colorful and intriguing than
their male counterparts. If their methods were wrong,
both Poison Ivy and Catwoman (villains, after all)
fought for worthwhile causes, like environmentalism
and animal rights, more admirable motivations than the
Joker or Two-Face ever had. When Poison Ivy and Harley
Quinn teamed up in the delightful episode "Harley and
Ivy," attempting to drown Batman by weighing him down
with kitchen appliances, it was easy to be
disappointed when Batman escaped and the girls were
brought to justice.
WB.com's Gotham Girls is an attempt to let
these characters shine on their own merits, without
any Batman or Robin in sight. The bimonthly episodes
each run about three to four minutes, and each are
left online for a month. (Currently, WB.com has not
provided an archive of older episodes.) Leaving behind
the notorious darkness of Batman: The Animated
Series, these Flash-animated shorts (each about
2.1 mb in size) generally focus on light, comedic
situations. This has its drawbacks: while the girls'
individual complexities aren't abandoned altogether,
their personalities are unfortunately reduced to their
most basic characteristics: Harley is an airhead,
Catwoman a loner, Poison Ivy a cunning schemer, and
Batgirl a crime fighter, the lone "conventional" hero
of the group. Nothing they do is really outside of
these set roles, and when paired with the frivolous
tone of the episodes, the girls' promising energies
are minimized into cartoon stereotypes.
All that said, Gotham Girls is still charming.
The clean lines and colors of the Flash animation suit
the adorably curvy, stylized look of the characters.
Fortunately, the voice cast from Batman
returns, helping the characters to retain their
originality. The plots are fairly thin, revolving
around one simple event (for example, Harley Quinn
baby-sits a lion cub for Catwoman in "Catsitter," or
Batgirl deceives her father, Commissioner Gordon, in
"Bat'ing Cleanup"), but the writing, mostly by
longtime Batman writer Paul Dini, is high
quality and some of the slapstick situations are
surprisingly laugh-out-loud funny, like when Harley
Quinn is turned into a baby, then beats up and
eventually destroys a wax statue of the Joker in "Baby
Boom."
Ultimately, though, it's a shame that Gotham Girls' creators don't realize the potential of either these characters or the medium of web animation. The light tone is entertaining, but by
shifting the focus from dramatic action to slapstick
humor, the makers don't allow the girls the same kinds
of conflicts that made them so compelling in
Batman. Neither do they make full use of the
web-only format; the slight interactive quality of the
episodes is an intriguing touch, allowing viewers to
choose between options, such as chess moves for Harley
Quinn to play in "Statergery" or weapons for Batgirl
to use in "Bat'ing Cleanup." But in each case, only
one choice actually advances the plot, turning the
whole decision-making process into a pointless
interruption of the narrative. The individual episodes
are not connected to each other in terms of a larger
plot, so there is no character development. Poison Ivy
is always going to remain the same Poison Ivy.
Gotham Girls is fun, but in the end, it's
nothing more than that.