Happy Anniversary!
It has been just six months since 9-11 and already we have
had a formal anniversary. Stilted moments of silence, child
poets, giant laser beams, and solemn speeches brought out
the ghosts that have yet to be put to rest and never will,
so long as there is a profit to be made on their continued
haunting.
HBO, Showtime, and FX have all announced plans to produce
TV movies about the events, but last Sunday, CBS took the
lead with a commercial-free special, 9/11. An
important documentary to some and exploitative reality
programming to others, the nearly uninterrupted two-hour
broadcast of footage shot inside the World Trade Center
provided an insider's view of the results of the terrorist
attacks. Gaining an estimated third of the American viewing
population, 9/11 was profitable, but at the expense
of many of the victims' families who felt the timing was
inappropriate. Although they publicly voiced their concern,
it did not change the network's decision to air the
program.
CBS defended the program by explaining that no deaths were
filmed and that the footage would be "respectful." Yet,
this is completely untrue; death is heard over and over and
over and over and over again, as people jump or fall from
the burning towers. CBS' ignorant justification shows just
how visual our culture is. As we hear a woman screaming
while she burns to death, narrator Jules Naudet explains:
"The image was so terrible; I made a decision not to film
it. It's not something anybody should see, or want to see."
Isn't it also a sound no one should want to hear? One can
only imagine how the families of the victims felt as they
listened to the constant sound of bodies slamming the
pavement. Not to mention all those who now get to guess
whether it was their loved one heard burning in the lobby.
CBS' sensitivity is truly heartwarming.
Or, maybe CBS is simply looking at the "larger picture."
Speaking to reporters after an exclusive media screening,
producer Susan Zirinsky said that it's important we don't
forget there's a war going on. Her attitude, borrowed from
John Ashcroft, suggests the true function of 9/11
may be getting America's jingoistic blood boiling, rather
than paying tribute to the heroism of the New York firemen
who died and survived, which is what we are led to believe
by the public service announcements and photographic
tributes that support the program suggested.
Yet, it is doubtful that the thousands of families who lost
loved ones in September or more recently, in Afghanistan,
need such a reminder. The flags may be coming down, but no
one has forgotten what happened because it is still
happening. And now, as the Bush administration prepares to
take their "anti-terror" campaign even further, into Iraq
especially, the media is playing a large role in not
letting us forget what happened on 9-11.
When Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was
kidnapped and murdered by the National Movement for the
Restoration of Pakistani Sovereignty (a terrorist group who
claimed responsibility), it should have surprised no one
that the footage of his execution ended up in the hands of
career sensationalist Geraldo Rivera. In between February's
Olympic events, he went on NBC to announce that he
possessed said footage but would not air it because it
would "inspire" terrorism. Not showing it out of respect
for Pearl's family seemed an afterthought. However, like
the producers of 9/11, he aired the next best thing:
footage of an unidentified Filipino man's head being
chopped off and rolling into the bushes -- the same fate
Pearl suffered. Considering the U.S.'s current involvement
in both Afghanistan and the Philippines, it seems the
function of this type of "world premiere" goes beyond
informational; it is overtly political and shamefully
exploitative. Yet, while Geraldo has always been the Jerry
Springer of the news world, such media propaganda and
exploitation are rarely so overt, which is precisely the
case with CBS' 9/11.
The special was sponsored by Nextel, and the public service
announcements that segmented the program tried so hard not
to be commercials that they came off looking even worse.
And the photographic tributes to the fallen firefighters
that aired at the end of the program looked cheap. Nextel
most likely had good intentions, but the idea that major
corporations are putting conscience over profit as a result
of 9-11 is laughable at best. After all, in the midst of
the patriotic fervor inspired by those tragic events,
innumerable Enron employees were robbed of their life
savings.
Of course, Nextel is working to give an impression that it
is the leader of a new trend in responsible practice (the
company did donate countless phones to aid the rescue
efforts of 9-11). Such a PR trend is nothing new, before
Enron became a universal symbol of corporate and political
crime, established corporate slogans like Chevron's "People
Do" and Nike's "Just Do It" had long provided ironic
messages in the context of what these companies really "Do"
behind their warped humanitarian disguises.
There were no commercials during news coverage on 9-11, so
why did CBS' 9/11 need Nextel's sponsorship? The
reality is that just as 9-11 has been turned into a pretext
for the US government to do whatever it wants, it has been
turned into a product by networks to gain huge money. It is
naïve to think the expressed wishes of those whose lives
were most affected by the events would matter in the face
of a massive, ratings-generating media spectacle. Perhaps
to refute such an argument, 9/11 was immediately
followed by a CBS newscast that reiterated just how
"respectful" the show was to the victims at this sensitive
first anniversary. As far as a remembrance, the two silent
beams of light in New York City were far more tasteful than
the shocking and disturbing footage and sounds of
9/11.
Politicians and journalists have repeatedly stated that the
attacks on 9-11 were "the worst acts of terrorism ever
committed on U.S. soil." While that claim seems to overlook
Slavery and the genocide of Native Americans, the attacks
were certainly the worst ever televised on U.S. soil. But
9-11 is simply not yet history for many people, still too
present to be co-opted and sold back to the rest of us. Of
course, the same argument can be made for the
aforementioned genocides, as well as Apartheid, East Timor,
the Holocaust, and countless other semi-recent atrocities.
There will always be conflict over when "now" is
appropriate and to whom, but in terms of 9/11,
perhaps the families of the victims knew best.