17 JANUARY 2001
I Feel Cheated
Throughout this week's episode of Temptation Island, I kept wondering: what is the point? If this is, as I
had been led to believe, a "reality show" about
temptation and seduction, where exactly is the
seduction? The second episode (airing 17 January)
displayed men's hands lightly caressing women's legs,
emphasized by the replaying of these brief moments so
they ran in a kind of tedious loop. I mean really, my
roommate shows more skin at a graduation party than
Temptation Island is offering. Last week's trailer
promised conflict, with Mandy wailing apologies to her
partner Billy. Now it looks as though this drama is
actually coming next week. I feel cheated. Come on
contestants, get tempted or get off the island.
First, the men were brought to a secret island
location and informed that they would "be given some
choices," namely, whether or not to watch tapes of
their girlfriends' "dates." Or, not the actual dates,
but rather the brief confessionals that their escorts
recorded after the dates. The twist to this seemingly
benign proposition was that if the guys "chose" to
watch the tapes, then their girlfriends would be
"forced" to watch comparable videos of their
boyfriends' dates. Likewise, if the men opted to not
watch the videos, their girlfriends would not be
afforded the opportunity to see the reciprocal tapes.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like only the
men have a choice, the women *must* do what their men
decide they will do.
After the guys shared a few hours bonding around a
bonfire, they were shipped back to Boystown and the
women were then conveyed to the bonfire location.
Although host Mark Walberg offered the women the same
speech as he gave the men (about how the options and
non-options work), he then informed Mandy and Ytossie
that they *must* watch Billy and Taheed's escorts'
videos. They had no choice in this matter: Mandy and
Ytossie (per the rules) were forced to watch these
confesssionals (which involved some self-vaunting on
the escorts' parts). Perhaps the next episode will
allow the women to choose for the men, thereby evening
the score, but for now, Temptation Island is turning
out to be a very male-centered show.
Perhaps the only intriguing factor that emerges from
tonight's episode, is that WRAZ-TV has cancelled
Temptation Island. This station in Raleigh, North
Carolina stated that it "will not support a program
that could potentially break up the parents of a young
child." This refers to the scandalous information --
which broke around the time of the first episode's
airing, that Ytossie and Taheed have a child together,
which is very "against the rules." Fox claims that it
did not have knowledge of this child and, as soon as
it learned the truth, the couple was promptly removed
from the island. I assume this will occur around
episode 3 or 4, and I also predict that the remaining
couples will have much to say about Ytossie and
Taheed. However, I will take this opportunity to
remind them, "Judge not, lest ye be judged."
Unfortunately, I felt that Temptation Island came up
short tonight. I felt guilty for about a minute, for
"wanting" to see personal crises, but then I reminded
myself, that's what I was promised. For some reason, I
still feel confident that the show will pick up and I
am eagerly anticipating the flurry sure to surround
Ytossie and Taheed's expulsion from the series.
Surely, they will offer the viewer some good insight
as to why they lied. Besides, how is it that Fox has
chosen to draw this particular moral line? The network
and the show's producers have purchased men and women
("escorts" and "contestants"), rounded them up and
presented them to each other like cattle, dressed them
in skimpy clothes and encouraged some limited lusting,
and now they're acting as though they had some sort of
standards all along. Please. Didn't anyone teach them
that sex makes babies? And that if you promote sex,
you promote the possibility of conception?
Maybe I'm reaching, but what if a baby is conceived on
Temptation Island? What then? Did the women have to
sign a waiver to have or not have an abortion? Or,
much like the bonfire choices, do the men have all the
say? What other yet-unknown "standards" has Fox
created? What morals -- or lack of same -- are they
really promoting?