Unhappy About the Happy Family
It's no secret that the sitcom is one of the most precise of all
television formats. It's like television haiku. Twenty-two and
a half minutes, the same characters every week, a simple but
interesting problem, zany happenings, clever dialogue, problem
solved, back to where we started, voila!
Adjust the setting between locations, adults, and kids, you've
got fifty years of successful television. The new Fox show
Titus obviously isn't happy about all that. It wants the sitcom
to do more. Unfortunately, Titus tries to push the sitcom
vehicle too far too fast, and it all crashes as a result.
Based on the hyper-dysfunctional family of stand-up comedian
Chris Titus, Titus tells us upfront that it isn't happy with
the way "the family" is typically portrayed on television. During a
narrative interruption in the second episode (originally taped
for the pilot, but deemed "too edgy" by the network), Chris Titus
turns to the camera and smugly asserts that 63% of families are
now termed "dysfunctional." Which means they are the norm. Which
also means, apparently, that they need their own sitcom, one that
shows how messed up a family can be. Titus means to fill that
void: as if emulating a group of talk show guests, the Titus
family consists of an alcoholic/womanizing/abusive father, a
psychotic mother who was in and out of mental hospitals, a jumpy,
violent brother, and Chris himself, who seems to have weathered
it fairly well to emerge as a fairly happy adult. Or has he?
In the moments when Chris Titus stops grinning and tries to act
to show real concern for his girlfriend Erin (Cynthia Watros) or
hurt at being betrayed he looks like a badly wounded human
being (or more precisely, the character based on him looks that
way). The show reveals the source of this wounding, repeatedly.
In one flashback, we see Dad (Stacy Keach) tell a 5-year-old
Titus not to tell his mother if a certain woman calls. Then the
mother pops in and tells the boy not to tell his father if a
certain man calls. To both of these commands, the boy says,
"Okay," and then sits on the couch eating his ice cream. Later
on, we watch Dad reading a teenaged Titus's journal to his poker
buddies while Titus stands in the background, listening. And in
yet another scene, we get to see Dad punch Titus right in the
face (via a clever "fist cam").
We also see the results of these childhood episodes: when Erin
seems to be messing around on him, he ransacks her office,
enraged by her betrayal (which reminds him of betrayals by his
father and mother). Or again, when Titus finds out Erin is being
sexually harassed, he immediately wants to use violence to solve
this problem, just the way his father and mother used violence to
solve their problems.
It's kind of hard to watch this depth of dysfunction in a sitcom.
Imagine an episode of Home Improvement where Tim the Toolman
bangs his hot Toolgirl while his three young sons watch through
the window. Or better yet, recall Oliver Stone's weird use of a
sitcom scene in Natural Born Killers. Watching Rodney
Dangerfield feel up his barely adolescent daughter (Juliette
Lewis) in the video format of a sitcom, complete with
laughtrack was chilling. It's not so far removed from what
Titus wants to show us. And it's a problem. Sitcoms were born
and have survived as simplistic, feel-good entertainments, in
which protagonists truly care about each other, are committed to
staying together, and learn at least minor lessons about
themselves, their relationships, and the world around them. Even
Seinfeld, which loved to claim that it had no hugs and no
lessons learned, had a core of characters who were committed
friends, knew each other intimately, and endured and tormented
outsiders, but never turned their backs on each other.
There's something about this simple and predictable form that
works. Sitcoms allow us to laugh at situations that might echo
our own lives, and in that laughter, we find a way to feel
slightly better about our experience. Titus's problem is that
it doesn't give its audience that kind of recharge. It's set up
just like a family-oriented sitcom, with the same light, peppy
tone, but it offers us dark humor inside that frame. It's like
eating Oreos and drinking vinegar: they don't taste good
together.
Maybe it would work if it avoided the flashbacks, which have on
occasion, showed real cruelty. There's some evidence that we can
take smidgeons of dark humor in adult-dominated sitcoms.
Remember when George's fiancee Susan died on Seinfeld? The
event was a tightrope to walk, because she had been in the inner
circle of friends for nearly an entire season, but the show made
it work. She died in a way that was bizarre, funny, and
unbelievable (poisoned by licking her wedding invitation
envelopes), and the other characters "respectfully" didn't start
really joking about it until a few episodes later.
At some level you have to admire Titus for what it's trying to
do. While the hour-long drama has clearly evolved now using
multiple storylines and characters, covering real life issues,
mixing comedy and tragedy the sitcom has stayed pretty much the
same. And now that reality TV (see especially Cops and Jerry Springer) has forced mass media to admit that dysfunction has no
limits in the family, it must be frustrating for people from
unhappy families to see old-fashioned, chirpy families on
television. While Roseanne, Grace Under Fire, and Married With Cildren not to mention The Simpsons might be its
obvious, immediate precursors, Titus pushes the representation
of family dysfunction even further. In doing so, it allows us to
ask about the limits of television. It allows us to see our own
predispositions as a culture, and gives us clues as to exactly
what psychology we bring to a situation that lets us laugh at
pain or distress. What shows like this don't do, I fear, is stay
on the air very long. I just can't imagine people raised on
Cosby not cringing when they see Titus.