Spike Lee’s 'Chiraq' Would Add to City’s Long Violent Filmography

by Nina Metz

Chicago Tribune (TNS)

27 April 2015

Chiraq will be the latest entry in a durable tradition of movies about a violent Chicago.
 

As the camera pans over the Chicago skyline in the opening frames of the 1953 noir “City That Never Sleeps,” a voice-over contemplates the nuances of “this giant, sprawling, sordid and beautiful, poor and magnificent city.”

All these decades later, a description that still rings true. The story follows a jaded beat cop who wants out of both the job and his marriage, with an eye on sexier doings with the stripper he keeps on the side. She’s called Angel Face. Of course.

“When I first came to this town,” she says, in a slice of delicious noir-speak, “I was gonna be — oh, there were a lot of things I was gonna do. Become famous. But Chicago’s the big melting pot, and I got melted but good.”

Felonious doings in the Windy City have long been a Hollywood obsession. I was thinking about this as plans are underway for filmmaker Spike Lee’s next project. “Chiraq” — which may be a permanent title, or just a place holder? — is to begin filming in Chicago this summer. Little else has been revealed. For now, we know this much: It will focus on black-on-black crime in the Englewood neighborhood.


It will be the latest entry in a durable tradition of movies about a violent Chicago. There is a marked consistency to entries in this cinematic history, nearly all of which are gangster stories that are directly about (or adjacent to) the era of Al Capone.

Even if Capone isn’t a character in the movie by name, his shadow looms large. You can draw a straight line from the 1927 silent “Underworld,” written by former Chicago newspaperman Ben Hecht, to those of a more recent vintage, including 1987’s “The Untouchables,” 2002’s “Road to Perdition” and “Chicago,” and 2009’s “Public Enemies.”

They are stories that center on white characters to the exclusion of others. Judging by studio interest, Chicago’s crime story may as well be trapped in amber, of a now-bygone era of tommy guns, Prohibition and mobsters in suits. In this respect, Lee’s film — which will put a black community front and center — has the potential to be unique.

“The allure of Chicago has always been recognized by Hollywood, but only up to a point,” said film historian Kyle Westphal. “The city is often used as a shorthand for grimy authenticity, but in name only.”

The one that really kicked it off was 1932’s “Scarface” (also from Hecht), about the exploits of a gangster who brutally eliminates the competition. Loosely based on Capone’s reign, it is a battle for dominance between the city’s North Side and South Side criminal elements.

Whatever pushback Spike Lee’s “Chiraq” has faced regarding its title so far, it’s nothing compared to what “Scarface” directors Howard Hawks and Richard Rosson (and producer Howard Hughes) encountered.

Amid pressure from the Hays Office, which governed movie standards, a subtitle was grudgingly added (“The Shame of the Nation”) along with a scolding foreword stating that “This picture is an indictment of gang rule in America …” — damning words meant to de-glamorize the film’s portrayal of crime. And yet, according to this tidbit on Britannica.com: “Among its top admirers was Capone, who was rumoured to have thrown Hawks a party to celebrate the movie, and was said to have had his own private print of the film.” Capone was in prison by that point, but it’s a good story.

What followed was a period of Chicago noirs, including 1955’s “The Man with the Golden Arm” (based on the Nelson Algren novel), 1950’s “Union Station” (starring William Holden) and “City That Never Sleeps” (after years of being impossible to obtain legally, it is now available on DVD). The latter two were filmed on location.

So was, rather famously, the 1948 true crime noir “Call Northside 777” starring Jimmy Stewart as a reporter working the story of a man wrongly convicted for the murder of a cop — in a town, the movie notes, with a “history of violence beating in its pulse.”

The movie is based on an actual case; a few years back my colleague Eric Zorn wrote about the real man behind the story, Joe Majczek, who was exonerated and released from prison three years before the film’s release. He died in 1973. When Zorn spoke with his son, “(he) told me that his parents never cared for the movie.”

“Roger Touhy, Gangster,” from 1944, is another one. It is loosely based on the real-life mob boss and bootlegger who operated in the Chicago suburbs. He was later framed by Capone for the kidnapping of “Jake the Barber” Factor (brother of cosmetics tycoon Max Factor) and sentenced to 99 years at Stateville Correctional Center near Joliet. The kidnapping was later revealed to be a hoax and Touhy was released in 1959, after spending 25 years inside (which included one short-lived escape).

The Stateville scenes were filmed on location — while Touhy was incarcerated there, which is both amazing and deeply weird — with a cameo from the actual warden, Joseph E. Ragen. He appears on screen with a warning: “I wish that every man, woman and child in America could see for themselves just how a person who has lived outside the law lives behind prison bars.”

The back story might be more interesting than the film itself. Like “Scarface” before it, there were impediments, some of which came from Touhy himself, who was granted a temporary restraining order blocking the movie’s release (temporary being the operative word). He also filed a libel suit against the studio; 20th Century Fox eventually settled for $15,000.

Then there’s 1948’s “The Undercover Man.” I’ll let film historian Kyle Westphal set the stage:

“The studios would often drum up pre-release publicity by spinning tales of dangerous Chicago location shooting, only for the finished film to be reshot, truncated, and dumped into theaters with minimal fanfare. Cult film director and Chicago native Joseph H. Lewis is a good example of this. While he’s on contract at Columbia, the studio announces he’ll make a location-heavy film called ‘Chicago Story,’ based loosely on the tax investigation that nabbed Al Capone. By the time the film is released, it’s been retitled ‘The Undercover Man’ and it’s sold as a generic crime film.”

The movie was based on a series of reports published in Collier’s magazine called “Undercover Man: He Trapped Capone.” In the words of film scholar John Greco on his blog twentyfourframes.wordpress.com, the “gritty, dark-lit cinematography is filled with murky, overcrowded streets, dark movie theaters and seedy hotel rooms not fit for a two-dollar hooker, but good enough for federal law enforcement officers to shack up in during the investigation.”

When I asked Greco about Chicago crime films that stand out, he cited 1959’s “Al Capone.”

“It’s all about Rod Steiger’s performance. He scared the hell out of me. He was loud, brash and violent. Steiger was a stocky actor and he looked a bit like Capone. It’s a low-budget film and there are plenty of fictional aspects to it, but the film, and especially Steiger’s performance, resonated with me in a way that other actors who portrayed the gangster do not.”

From a period roughly spanning the 1970s through the ‘90s, you start to see escapist fare creeping into the mix: 1973’s “The Sting,” 1981’s “Thief” and 1986’s “Running Scared.” But by the turn of the 21st century, filmmakers were reverting back to form, embracing Chicago’s crime stories as retro curiosities.

If we’re talking realism, a smattering of nonfiction films over the years have come a bit closer to capturing the true impact of crime and neighborhood violence in the post-Capone era. William Friedkin’s “The People vs. Paul Crump” from 1962 (which my colleague Rick Kogan wrote about here) tells the story of a death row inmate sentenced for a botched robbery and the shooting death of a security guard.

From 2011, Steve James’ “The Interrupters” is worth seeing for the wildly complicated scenes that blend tension and comedy featuring a man called Flamo, who greets visitors to his door by angrily tossing his cellphone into the snow. A few moments later, he realizes the absurdity of what he’s done and asks someone nearby to help: “I’m walking around with my f——— pistol — can you grab my phone, brother?”

More recently, “Dreamcatcher,” which has been airing on Showtime since March, offers a portrait of the often-precarious world of prostitutes who unhappily roam the streets on Chicago’s South and West sides. Their lives are borne of childhood sexual abuse, parental abandonment, drug addiction and violence, and the film follows the efforts of Brenda Myers-Powell (a former prostitute herself), who works to help them climb out of this trap.

But back to the narrative features for a moment. I don’t think you can fully access the cinematic history of violence in Chicago without including 1973’s “The Spook Who Sat by the Door.”

It is by far the most political of all the movies I listed (minus the documentaries), and it so clearly freaked out the powers that be.

Black radicalism is at the story’s core, adapted from the novel by Chicago writer Sam Greenlee (who died last May) and directed by Ivan Dixon, who made his reputation as an actor on “Hogan’s Heroes.”

In the film, a former CIA man — the agency’s only black employee — gets fed up with tokenism and hypocrisy and returns home to Chicago, where he trains young black men in the guerrilla tactics he learned on the job, which the group then uses as leverage in the fight for civil rights.

Ironically, most of the film was shot in Gary, Ind. (A movie about the Black Power movement getting Mayor Richard J. Daley’s OK to film? Not a chance.) There is just one scene the filmmakers were able to snatch on-the-fly in Chicago, on the “L.”

I wrote about the movie’s trajectory in 2011: “Shortly after it opened in theaters, the film vanished altogether — pulled by its distributor, some allege, and bowing to pressure from the FBI. The narrative, about disciplined efforts to take down The Man through brain power and armed revolts, was intentionally controversial, and it doesn’t take a leap of the imagination to presume the film made those in certain corridors of power nervous enough to ‘disappear’ the movie altogether.”

It wasn’t until 2004 that the movie became available on DVD. It’s still something of an obscurity. And worth checking out.

//related
We all know how critical it is to keep independent voices alive and strong on the Internet. Please consider a donation to support our work. We are a wholly independent, women-owned, small company. Your donation will help PopMatters stay viable through these changing, challenging times where costs have risen and advertising has dropped precipitously. PopMatters needs your help to keep publishing. Thank you.


//comments

//Mixed media
//Blogs

The Thoughtful Absurdity of 'Spaceplan'

// Moving Pixels

"Spaceplan is a goofy game that still manages to pack a potent emotional punch.

READ the article