Losing Our Hare

Adam Williams

With its futuristic Loonatics, Warner Bros. buries an American icon under comic-book bluster and video-gamey gunk, driving an unapologetic final nail into Bugs Bunny's cartoon coffin.

Listening to Warner Bros. executives tout their recent brainchild Loonatics, purists must have been infuriated by the collective lack of respect shown Bugs Bunny and his animated compatriots. Using the slick development-speak term of re-imagined to justify their heresy, these white-collar corporate cretins are perpetwating the ultimate wuse on generations of fans who grew up with classic Looney Tunes as a morning-television staple.

Set seven hundred years in the future, Loonatics features grotesque stick-figure derivatives of Warners' beloved Looney Tunes characters, all designed to carry the franchise into the new millennium. Gone are the beautifully crafted nuances that defined Bugs, Daffy and their cartoon brethren, replaced instead with quasi-superhero powers more consistent with graphic novels. As unappealing as the program's five stars appear -- I refuse to acknowledge the absurd inclusion of the gratuitous female rabbit heroine -- the company claims that fresh futuristic interpretation were initiated to make the characters "more hip" and attractive. Such reasoning rings hollow though, as I recall the future being successfully visited long before the advent of manned spaceflight in uproarious shorts such as Haredevil Hare (1948) and Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century (1953). And the animation industry's definitive statement of hip? Well sufferin' succotash, that occurred half a century ago when Marvin Martian first appeared with a bristle brush topped helmet and matching gym sneakers.

With its futuristic Loonatics, Warner Bros. buries an American icon under comic-book bluster and video-gamey gunk, driving an unapologetic final nail into Bugs Bunny's cartoon coffin.

From his official introduction in 1941's A Wild Hare, Bugs embodied all the elements of style necessary to become one of Hollywood's most endearing stars. Quick witted and brash, what Bugs lacked in sheer physicality he made up for in guile and a wicked sense of humor as he left a memorable collection of vanquished and heckled foes in his wake. Without the aid of steroids or a megabucks salary, our cotton-tailed hero stared down every one of his adversaries and emerged victorious; whether challenging fictional literary scoundrels (Rabbit Hood 1949), gargantuan brutes (Baseball Bugs 1946, Gorilla My Dreams 1948, Bunny Hugged 1951), intimidating floor walkers (Hair Conditioned 1945), robust opera singers (Long-Haired Hare 1949), feisty Aboriginal warriors (Bushy Hare 1950), and mad scientists (Hair-Raising Hare 1946), to Elmer Fudd, Yosemite Sam and the usual pack of animal kingdom rivals, Bugs Bunny enchanted viewers with his wise-cracking charms and never-give-in determination. From cross-dressing his way out a predicament to taking the wheel of a speeding B-17 bomber, the wascally wabbit made fools of his pursuers and brought joy to millions.

But the decline of Bugs Bunny has been an excruciatingly drawn-out process, one made more painful with the recent bastardization of his impressive career achievements via Tiny Toons and various blasphemous full-length movies. In actuality the death knell for Bugs and friends sounded at the first appearance of the television thought- police, a fanatical faction of do-gooders who deemed it necessary to edit out questionable scenes from vintage Looney Toonies so as to protect our nation's impressionable youngsters from, gasp, gratuitous violence. In retrospect, the knee-jerk reaction to such animated hijinks is as laughable as it is ironic; the Warner Bros. behemoth continues to market films with potentially disturbing imagery, (you think Harry Potter is entirely suitable for adolescent viewers? It's about…sorcery), yet it trembles in fear at the thought of Bugs dispatching a nemesis with a well placed falling anvil, poke in the eye or frying pan to the head. Lest we not forget that extensive government-funded research conducted since the mid 1970s has failed to produce a single account citing Wile E. Coyote's use of Acme explosive products as the catalyst for violent criminal behavior. (Speaking from personal experience, I was raised on a steady diet of Bugs Bunny and never showed one whit of cartoon-affected behavior, although frequently pinching my little sister's cheeks and referring to her as a "ta-ra-ra-goon-dee-ay" was not always viewed as normal conduct for a three-year-old.)

In addition to unceremoniously relegating scenes of perceived violence to the cutting room floor, the quavering studio's reign of terror also produced a second example of shameless capitulation: Deleting images from Looney Tunes films that selected (see thin-skinned and humorless) groups might find objectionable. Were there frequent uses of political and ethnic stereotypes in the pre- and post-war Looney offerings? Of course, and all were crafted with a sly wink, tongue planted firmly in cheek. The Warner's crew from the 1940s was a brilliant collection of artistic geniuses and rebels, laboring under the radar with minimal budgets as they took on the industry giant known as Disney. Much of their work mirrored the country's socio-political attitudes (particularly the prominent fear and loathing of the German and Japanese military machines). The comically thematic characterizations they indulged in were accurate reflections of the time. Erasing such material from film reels does not eliminate its existence or the rationale behind it, nor does it maintain the integrity of Warner's cartoon catalogue. Sadly, wartime classics designed to boost morale through outlandish animated depictions such as Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips and Russian Rhapsody (both 1944) have long since been relegated to the censored heap. These are but two exquisite time-capsule relics that decades of studio executives failed to appreciate the grander scope of, as they disregarded the vintage animation process and its importance to the historical (and hysterical) record.

Perhaps the introduction of Loonatics would be less troubling if Warner Bros. was honest with the public instead of trying to cloak its new program in a veil of forced enthusiasm and backslapping ingenuity. Let's be frank: This is not about taking beloved characters to the next level for the sake of creative evolution, but rather establishing a competitive toe-hold in the lucrative toy and video game arena. Cute and cuddly action figures do not garner significant market share as they once did, nor do they dominate the electronic shoot-'em-up circuit. Loonatics is an amalgamation of a trusted commodity with advanced weaponry and skill sets, specifically positioned to compete with a litany of similarly equipped entrants, ranging from Spawn's sci-fi creatures to Marvel's comic book alumni.

So now, more than sixty years after Bugs Bunny manned the helm of Warner's cavalcade of animated stars, he and four of his original cohorts are laid to rest. Oh, studio execs will continue to wax poetic about Bugs' glory days (what they actually know of them) while pumping up Loonatics, but the new program and its re-imagined cast have closed the curtain on an incredible cinematic career, thus marking the end of an era.

Sadly, Wabbit Season is now officially closed... That's all folks…

To be a migrant worker in America is to relearn the basic skills of living. Imagine doing that in your 60s and 70s, when you thought you'd be retired.

Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century

Publisher: W. W. Norton
Author: Jessica Bruder
Publication date: 2017-09

There's been much hand-wringing over the state of the American economy in recent years. After the 2008 financial crisis upended middle-class families, we now live with regular media reports of recovery and growth -- as well as rising inequality and decreased social mobility. We ponder what kind of future we're creating for our children, while generally failing to consider who has already fallen between the gaps.

Keep reading... Show less

Very few of their peers surpass Eurythmics in terms of artistic vision, musicianship, songwriting, and creative audacity. This is the history of the seminal new wave group

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame nominating committee's yearly announcement of the latest batch of potential inductees always generates the same reaction: a combination of sputtering outrage by fans of those deserving artists who've been shunned, and jubilation by fans of those who made the cut. The annual debate over the list of nominees is as inevitable as the announcement itself.

Keep reading... Show less

This film suggests that all violence—wars, duels, boxing, and the like—is nothing more than subterfuge for masculine insecurities and romantic adolescent notions, which in many ways come down to one and the same thing.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) crystalizes a rather nocturnal view of heterosexual, white masculinity that pervades much of Stanley Kubrick's films: after slithering from the primordial slime, we jockey for position in ceaseless turf wars over land, money, and women. Those wielding the largest bone/weapon claim the spoils. Despite our self-delusions about transcending our simian stirrings through our advanced technology and knowledge, we remain mired in our ancestral origins of brute force and domination—brilliantly condensed by Kubrick in one of the most famous cuts in cinematic history: a twirling bone ascends into the air only to cut to a graphic match of a space station. Ancient and modern technology collapse into a common denominator of possession, violence, and war.

Keep reading... Show less

Award-winning folk artist Karine Polwart showcases humankind's innate link to the natural world in her spellbinding new music video.

One of the breakthrough folk artists of our time, Karine Polwart's work is often related to the innate connection that humanity has to the natural world. Her latest album, A Pocket of Wind Resistance, is largely reliant on these themes, having come about after Polwart observed the nature of a pink-footed geese migration and how it could be related to humankind's intrinsic dependency on one another.

Keep reading... Show less

Victory Is Never Assured in ‘Darkest Hour’

Gary Oldman in Darkest Hour (2017) (Photo by Jack English - © 2017 FOCUS FEATURES LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. / IMDB)

Joe Wright's sharp and only occasionally sentimental snapshot of Churchill in extremis as the Nazi juggernaut looms serves as a handy political strategy companion piece to the more abstracted combat narrative of Dunkirk.

By the time a true legend has been shellacked into history, almost the only way for art to restore some sense of its drama is to return to the moment and treat it as though the outcome were not a foregone conclusion. That's in large part how Christopher Nolan's steely modernist summer combat epic Dunkirk managed to sustain tension; that, and the unfortunate yet dependable historical illiteracy of much of the moviegoing public.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.