Music

Vinyl Spin Cycle

Each time I sheepishly purchase another CD, I’m digging myself further into the technological hole, and falling farther behind the cool vinyl-playing crowd.

Here's a question that'll make you really examine your love for music: Which would you rather have, a brand-new, 32-inch flat-screen TV, or a slightly used record player with a decent set of speakers? For my friend Brian, the call was easy. A month or so ago, he sold his television – one his few luxury items– so that he could afford to listen to the dozen records he owns in relative style.

This was at least Brian's third record player of his life, so he knew what he was getting into. Though I've long thought of making a similar purchase, I've never been able to make the commitment – and I'm not certain I'd ever trade the luxury of On Demand in order to alter my listening experience slightly.

See, as the years have gone by, it's become harder and harder to convince myself that buying a record player would be worth it, given the amount of money and time I've invested in building my large collection of CDs and MP3s. Sure, those platforms may not have the same romantic – or sonic, depending on who you ask – qualities as vinyl, but they've always gotten the job done for me.

It seems silly to go and buy the same music again, only in a different form. How would I choose what's worth duplicating on this other platform? Or would my record collection be completely different from the music I already own, based more around what might sound good on vinyl? Either way, it seems like a hassle.

This is not to say I don't understand the allure of the record player. During the summer following my freshman year of college, I spent a good amount of time in my parents' basement, playing pool and listening to my dad's barely used turntable. There were plenty of records to choose from (Big Brother and the Holding Company, Led Zeppelin, Boz Scaggs, The Moody Blues, The Beatles, a whole lot of Simon & Garfunkel), but I eventually went out to a local used record store and added two more to the collection: The Band's first two LPs, Music from Big Pink and the self-titled follow-up (aka The Brown Album).

I have to admit that there was something that just felt right about hearing those albums on vinyl, cuing up the needle and listening to the first crackle of "Tears of Rage" come pouring through the speakers that were older than I was. It brought me a little closer to the music and the way I felt it was meant to be experienced.

But when I began school in the fall, I left those records behind and continued to buy CDs. With all the music sharing I was now doing – trading MP3s, burning copies of my friends' collections – and all the moving around I did, a record player seemed, well, impractical. That doesn't mean it lost its appeal.

As I began to get more heavily into music, and spent more and more time in record shops, I began to feel a little like a philistine. Records were in some ways a status symbol for "true" music-heads in a variety of genres, and I wasn't part of the club. Not only that, but I could forget about my occasional, delusional fantasies of becoming a DJ if I didn’t own a turntable. Though CD-turntables could be had, using one would be akin to using a pencil on a crossword puzzle (and the soon-to-be-popular computer DJing would be like doing on online puzzle with hint mode "on").

In some of the more serious stores, the CD rack was relegated to one small corner, while the stacks of records held the real gems. I'd enjoy browsing through those crates, marveling at the artwork and just loving the package as a whole, but in the end, I'd sheepishly purchase another CD or four, thus digging myself further into the technological hole. It was like I was in a relationship that I didn't know how to leave – and I couldn't help occasionally flirting with what I couldn't have.

Of course, you can only flirt for so long. A few years ago, upon moving into a new apartment, I went to a nearby shop and picked out a number of records – including The Talking Heads' More Songs About Buildings and Food, Roland Kirk's Kirk's Works, Thelonious Monk's Misterioso, Bob Dylan's Planet Waves and Sugarhill Gang and The Furious Five's "Showdown". I made sure to choose only albums from artists that I actually liked, not just ones whose covers were attractive – though visual appeal was definitely a factor, as I wasn't buying these records for their sound (which made the obligatory inspection of each feel a little silly), but rather so that I could nail their covers to my basement wall.

The resulting display got a lot of compliments – my only interior decorating touch to do so – but it also inspired a lot of questions about what I did with the records. The answer? Nothing. I wasn't going to toss them out, of course, but I also had no real use for them. So as much as this decoration announced my love for music and for these specific artists, it also seemed to expose me as a fraud.

Recently, I've witnessed a few more friends take the record-player plunge, and happily enjoyed the fruits of their purchases. One of the best things about record players, I think, is their ability to make music-listening into an event again. With so much music readily available at the click of a button, it's become rarer for people to gather around and pay attention to a particular recording. Even among a group of music-obsessed people, it's as much about finding the next song as it is about focusing on what's playing.

Record players also allow you to appreciate music in a whole new way. As much as I'm not totally convinced that everything sounds better on a record player, I definitely think that there are albums and artists that do – I can't imagine I'd sit down and listen to a Bill Monroe CD, but hearing him recently on Brian's record player was revelatory.

If there was ever a time for me to go ahead and buy a record player, it's now – I'm no longer buying CDs with the frequency I used to, if at all, and between my girlfriend and I we could build up a substantial, diverse collection of LPs. But now I have a new excuse – instead of spending my time and money, I can just go over to Brian's and listen to records when I get the urge. Even better, I hear he's thinking about buying a film projector to compensate for the loss of his nice TV. I just hope he doesn't have to sell his couch, too.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image