Professor Layton and the Diabolical Box

Thomas Cross

It is hard to know how to recommend Diabolical Box. It is a great game, and it is also the spitting image of its predecessor.

Professor Layton and the Diabolical Box

Publisher: Nintendo
Players: 1
Price: $29.99
Platform: Nintendo DS
ESRB Rating: Everyone 10+
Developer: Level-5
Release date: 2009-08-24

Professor Layton is a brilliant excuse to solve puzzles and brain teasers for those who would normally turn their noses up at such a pastime. On the surface, it’s a fairly typical adventure game, where new characters, areas, and plot are discovered through the solving of almost completely arbitrary puzzles. It doesn’t really matter why they’re there, but they’re fun to solve, so why ask?

The first Professor Layton was fresh and fun in so many ways. Not only were its puzzles fun and tricky, but the meta-game, the bizarre Agatha Christie-like search for a suspected kidnapper and for a mythical treasure, were outlandishly persuading. It helped that the game was incredibly well-made: the animation and art were beautiful, the voice-work was as appropriately outrageous and faux-European as the story, and the puzzles were (for the most part) worth the price of the game.

Its sequel, the direly named Professor Layton and the Diabolical Box, delivers what you’d expect from such a sequel: more puzzles, more over-the-top gentlemanly puzzle solving from the indefatigable Professor Layton, and more “sinister” plots.

As before, the game’s art and music are incredibly produced. The music may get a bit boring and annoying after you’ve heard the same ditty (set to a particularly difficult puzzle) a hundred times, but it’s still quirky and catchy in the right ways.

The animation is just as beautiful as it was the first time around. In fact, the game is, aside from its plot and puzzles being exactly the same as it used to be, more or less the same. There are some minor gameplay changes and some new minigames, but nothing (that was perfectly made before) has been broken or changed.

Thus, Layton and his faithful, high-pitched companion, Luke, set forth into the vaguely European countryside bound for adventure and perhaps a small dash of peril. The plot is mostly the same kind of terribly complicated, confused fluff that the first game produced: Layton has received word by way of post that an old colleague plans on exploring the myth of the “Diabolical Box.” This mysterious case is rumored to bring misfortune and death upon those who probe too deeply into its true nature. Layton and Luke, ever curious, decide to visit the Professor to learn of his findings.

Unsurprisingly, when they arrive, the Professor is quite mysteriously dead. The hangdog Inspector Chelmey suspects natural causes are at the root of the old man’s death, but Layton and Luke quickly deduce that something darker occurred. In due time, they follow a trail of clues to the Molentary Express, the game’s stand-in for the Orient Express.

There they solve puzzles, rescue children and dogs, and generally act like helpful, puzzle-solving Good Samaritans. The game begins to pick up narrative speed when the duo are waylaid in a small town, whose elders and inhabitants may be connected to the titular “Box” in more ways than one.

The plot gets murkier and sillier from there. Suffice it to sa that nothing is as it seems, and random people in every scene will force Layton and Luke to solve random puzzles. Thankfully, the designers have realized that every person shouldn’t necessarily dole out puzzles. As a result, you’ll now have the strange pleasure of unlocking puzzles by looking at innocuous objects. For instance after examining a plant or tree, Layton or Luke will turn to one another and talk about how they “just remembered” a puzzle which has nothing to do with trees or plants.

It’s all strangely enticing and endearing, and there are enough barely new bits of gameplay to keep the game from feeling like an exact copy of the original. Instead of decorating Layton and Luke’s hotel rooms, you now have to rebuild a broken camera, help an overweight hamster get in shape (and no, I am not making that up), and, most hilariously of all, brew tea for your thirsty puzzle solvers.

As far as puzzle solving goes, it’s not as if there are any amazing new advances in puzzle solving technology for you to marvel at. This time around players can draw (and thankfully save) notes and diagrams over any puzzle screen. This is incredibly useful (and was only sporadically available in the original game) as it allows players to keep track of variables, names, patterns and much more. It may seem like cheating to some, but to the rest of us, it just makes the already fun task of solving riddles a bit less of a hassle.

It’s hard to know how to recommend Diabolical Box. It’s a great game, and it’s different from most other puzzle games on the DS or any other system. It’s also the spitting image of its predecessor, and it feels just a little tired. In fact, this review reads exactly as a review for the previous game might have. For newcomers to the franchise, this is the slightly more player friendly iteration (although not all of the puzzles are up to the first game’s standards).

Regardless of the ground that it retreads, this is a game that will enchant gamers and non-gamers alike. It’s universally appealing, and it allows for as much or as little involvement as a player might wish. If only more puzzle games decided to immerse their brain teasers in cute, amusing back stories and characters, I might actually play puzzle games that didn’t say Professor Layton on them.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.