If You're Going to San Francisco...

Image (partial) courtesy of the Criterion Collection

The Complete Monterey Pop Festival perfectly captures the dangerously unstable compound called rock music right before it exploded and permanently altered the American cultural landscape.

Various Artists'

The Complete Monterey Pop Festival

Label: Criterion
US Release Date: 2009-09-22

On the weekend of 16-18 June 1967, Dunhill label chief Lou Adler, Beatles publicist Derek Taylor, and John Phillips of the Mamas and Papas presented the Monterey Pop Festival to 55,000 rock 'n' roll besotted disciples. The festival became the prototype for future rock festivals and was the unofficial coming-out party for the 'Summer of Love'.

The promoters hired D.A. Pennebaker, hot off the success of his Bob Dylan documentary Don't Look Back, to capture the weekend. His resulting films, Monterey Pop, Jimi Plays Monterey, and Shake! Otis At Monterey perfectly captured the dangerously unstable compound called rock music right before it exploded and permanently altered the American cultural landscape. The Criterion Collection's The Complete Monterey Pop Festival contains all three films, plus Pennebaker's outtakes of other performers and Pennebaker's and Adler's audio commentary.

All presented in glorious Blu-Ray technology.

I have yet to upgrade to Blu-Ray. I have yet to upgrade to HD television. A couple of weeks ago, half my stereo system plunged from a top the perilous stack of LP-filled crates on which they perched, killing my eight-year old subwoofer. I in no way possessed the kind of gear needed to do this set justice.

But hell, I've gerry-rigged far lesser technological resources into working. I walked to the local video store fully confident in my abilities to pull this off.

The perfect casting choice for a local revival of the film Clerks processed my Blu-Ray request. He informed me that I was the first person to rent one. I'm fairly certain this is because of the $250.00 deposit.

I put down less money for my first car.

Blu-Ray player in hand, I arrived home eager to luxuriate in a bastardized hi-def experience. I followed the most basic instructions I've ever read for a high-end component.

And I couldn't get the blue screen off my Samsung TV.

I went back to the directions. I phoned a friend. I ran it through my stereo receiver. I called the video store back and was made even more aware of my own ignorance.

It was Wednesday night. My column is due Monday night. I would be in Iowa for the weekend. What to do...?

I ended up enjoying this package on a 15-inch HD screen in a friend's bedroom. Not optimal conditions for a Criterion Collection product.

And you're OK with that, right?

Now to the film. I saw the Hendrix and Redding films before, but never the official festival film itself. I had high hopes. Pennebaker's Don't Look Back might be my favorite documentary of all-time.

Then there is Monterey's line-up. The Paul Butterfield Blues Band. The Byrds. Big Brother and the Holding Company. Buffalo Springfield. Simon and Garfunkel. Jefferson Airplane. Mamas and the Papas. The Who. Plus, Redding and Hendrix.


The film opens with Scott McKenzie's 'San Francisco (Be Sure to Wear Flowers in Your Hair)'. While the 'it' pop single of that time plays, we glimpse preparations for the festival and images of young kids running their freak flags high enough to be seen all over the world.

Pennebaker belonged to the Direct Camera school of documentaries, alongside peers Albert Maysles and Richard Leacock. Direct Camera docs sought for a kind of 'you-are-there' perspective. In Don't Look Back, Pennebaker kept the camera right off Bob's shoulder. So close at times you could almost light his cigarette.

Pennebaker could never achieve that same level of intimacy with the cast of thousands who attended and performed at Monterey Pop. But he does grant us insider-level access. We see gorgeous Michele Phillips and her husband and band-mate John talk to Dionne Warwick's people (Burt Bacharach?). We see Mama Cass pop her head off her boyfriend's shoulder and mouth “Wow” as Janis Joplin and Big Brother howl through 'Ball and Chain'. We see blissed-out and stoned revelers find somebody to love or get lost in the music. We see the 'Summer of Love'-or at least we see the rose-colored vision of it promulgated by the Boomer media ever since.

Pennebaker's style allows these classic rock icons to step off the pedestals that led to such neck strain for my generation. David Crosby gushes about the quality of the sound system. Michele Phillips inquires about Country Joe and the Fish's luggage. After an exchange of perplexed glances and shrugged shoulders amongst the band, they inform her they don't have any. Simon and Garfunkel appear to be one person, flooded by the red stage-lights and filmed at just the right distance.

The 'Summer of Love' was not the only Monterey debut. Monterey announced to the world that pop music now firmly followed a blues beat. Simon and Garfunkel and the Mamas and the Papas sounded great, but this was not 1964. From the moment Dylan plugged in, the folk-pop genre suffered a slow death.

Monterey was the wake.

Once the dust settled after electric performances from Redding, Hendrix, and The Who, the record execs in attendance knew what was going to sell right now. Whether soul or hard blues, Clive Davis, Mo Ostin, and Jerry Wexler left knowing that it had to be LOUD!

If you don't believe me, listen to the final two Beatles albums. You know, the ones you just bought recently for the fifth time.

But this is not the only development the money men noted. The sound system that left Crosby in awe finally could generate the requisite strength to reach concert-goers waaay in the back. Fillmore owner and pop impresario Bill Graham, in attendance, surely had his interest piqued. From Monterey on, the most popular pop acts would fill the largest arenas.

The successful trade done by festival merchants also bore further corporate investigation. The reason you don't see tie-dyed hippies or “Don't be that guy”s with Who t-shirts is because they didn't exist.

But they sure would now.

In short, the Monterey magic couldn't even last the weekend. Jimi, Janis, and the Jefferson Airplane all signed lucrative recording deals shortly after their performances. How'd that turn out for everybody?


There was no better band to close Monterey than the Grateful Dead. The Dead would trot-out the perfectly embalmed corpse of the 'Summer of Love' every evening at hippie-jammed sheds and arenas for nearly thirty years. And earn a pretty penny.

“Turn on, tune in, drop out”? Ha! Most of the Monterey performers did anything but drop out. They sought hungrily for the engorged corporate teat of a Gulf and Western or Warner Bros. The artists themselves killed the Monterey commune vibe that so impressed Rolling Stone Brian Jones.

“Mr. Crosby, your 747 is ready.”

Maybe my favorite moment in the film is the shots of Hells Angels members walking the fairgrounds, getting into the groove. Yes, the same people who eagerly ushered out the '60s at Altamont with a subtle baton and boot heel (under Jerry Garcia's blessing, no less) made it to the christening. How sweet!

With The Complete Monterey Pop Festival, you can own exactly what the late '60s never were. I have to admit the fantasy is quite compelling, even if the Who's and Hendrix's acts of stage destruction do not startle post-Boomers (I've seen plenty of crappy bands destroy their instruments).

What are you left with? Otis Redding framed by a halo of sweat and light, deep into his sermon, bringing eyesight to the blind. Janis Joplin open-throated and barefoot, naked to the world. Jimi Hendrix at one with the universe, baring Excalibur to a grateful land. Pennebaker's films reveal that at the heart of every great artistic movement there lies deep reserves of sincerity and imagination.

You just had to be there.

Image (partical) courtesy of the Criterion Collection

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.