Squarepusher: Solo Electric Bass 1

Solo Electric Bass 1 effortlessly careens from frenetic rhythmic études to moody atmospheric pieces that veer dangerously close to random instrument plucking,


Solo Electric Bass 1

Label: Warp
US Release Date: Import
UK Release Date: 2009-08-17
Artist website

It's not like this is entirely out of left field -- we've been hearing Tom Jenkinson's experiments with live instrumentation since Music Is Rotted One Note, an album now heralded as one of the Squarepusher classics. His electric bass playing was a central part of Ultravisitor as well, and is one of the reasons that Jenkinson tends to be put on a pedestal above many other electronic artists -- despite the fact that he's a hell of a beat programmer, he can also play what people consider a "real instrument". In fact, as Music Is Rotted One Note showed us over ten years ago, he can play a few.

Obviously, Jenkinson knows he can play as well. It takes some serious belief in oneself to release an album that is entirely made up of live performance of a single instrument. Yet, that's exactly what we have here, in the form of Solo Electric Bass 1, the most obvious foray into jazz music that Jenkinson has yet attempted.

Solo Electric Bass 1 sounds exactly as you'd expect it to. It effortlessly careens from frenetic rhythmic études to moody atmospheric pieces that veer dangerously close to random instrument plucking, and seems to make perfect sense while doing so, if only because anyone who hears it will already be familiar with the frenetic style Jenkinson brings to his electronic music.

Still, the purity of approach is what could most surprise someone hearing Solo Electric Bass 1 for the first time. Despite the fact that it is, as the title would indicate, an electric bass, Jenkinson makes the conscious decision not to put any effects on it. This is not, say, a Tim Reynolds, whose solo work uses pedals and effect boards to turn his guitar into instruments not immediately identifiable to the human ear, often relying on the sound of many hands playing through expertly-timed delay loops. There's no doubt that Jenkinson knows how to pull off tricks like this, but he chooses not to. What his audience hears doesn't sound all that different from what they would hear if he unplugged, despite the obvious volume difference.

The tracks themselves are nameless save for numbers, giving the impression that Jenkinson's creation was an impromptu one. Further confusing matters is that the numbers are non-sequential, which may or may not mean that one would have to rearrange them to hear the order in which they were actually played. Given the opacity of approach, however, Solo Electric Bass 1 flows like an album should flow, what with highs, lows, and lots of pseudomelodic jazzy noodling in between.

There are some highlights, particularly the moments in which Jenkinson's celebrated sense of rhythm comes out to play -- the seventh track, "Seb-1.03", builds subtly to the one place on the album that could truly get your head nodding. Opener "Seb-1.01" is lovely and melodic, lulling listeners into a meditative zen state before jarring them out of it with dissonance, and closer "Seb-1.12" hits the fasts and the slows with equal ease, summarizing the album nicely.

Still, it's impossible throughout Solo Electric Bass 1 to escape the spectre of the "vanity project", given that the music contained on the album has such potential to alienate the typical Squarepusher listener. It's just as likely to bore as to thrill, and while Jenkinson is clearly demonstrating his love for his instrument, he's not displaying an awful lot of emotion for anything else. It's not an album that goes deep into the psyche, it's an album that makes a case for appreciation of the purest manifestation of the electric bass. Some of Jenkinson's fans will find it endlessly fascinating, and some might swear never to buy another of his albums without hearing it first.

Most, however, will hear it, shrug an indifferent shrug, and let it collect dust on the shelf between Music Is Rotted One Note and Ultravisitor.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.