Gwar: 13 December 2009 - New York

Vijith Assar

It's almost hard to consider Gwar "shock rock", since gasping instead of laughing would mean you've somehow managed to discount the campiness.



City: New York, NY
Venue: The Fillmore
Date: 2009-12-13

I've never paid much attention to GWAR aside from the occasional Beavis and Butthead placement in the '90s, but the band playing when we walked in late sounded exactly like what I always imagined they might have when bringing them up as a hyperbolic extreme (a sort of Godwin's Law for metal, perhaps) with way too many loud guitars,indecipherable vocals, etc. Unfortunately, they were sensibly attired. "What, no costumes tonight?" I immediately remarked. "Screw that." Upon turning to leave, though, we spied the merch booth and realized that it was the opening band (unfortunately I can't tell you who it was because there was too much blood dripping from their logo to actually read it).

GWAR, on the other hand, turned out to have a surprisingly listenable dose of perfectly competent high-powered id-metal. Listening was not the point, however. Outlandish costumes aside, you also have the accompanying rock-opera storylines and the Gallagher-esque constant spray of hopefully-washable liquids into the crowd from a variety of severed limbs and other distressing sources (penises, giant cannons -- the latter had some serious range, as did the former, I guess, all things considered). It's almost hard to consider it "shock rock", since gasping instead of laughing would mean you've somehow managed to discount the campiness.

Let's see just how strong your grasp of the absurdity is. Only one item in each of the following sets is fabricated.

1) Which costume does not appear in the band?

a) Roman centurion (12 spikes)

b) Dragon (0 spikes)

c) Metal bear trap teeth with devil horns (15 spikes, including horns)

2) Which prop weapon was not used on stage?

a) Laser gun

b) Battle axe

c) Enormous arm-mounted buzzsaw blade

3) Which of the following was not included in the ten-minute video introduction?

a) A VH-1 style "Behind the Murder" mockumentary

b) A commercial for the "sperm and slide", a perverse twist on the popular backyard toy

c) Bobcat Goldthwait

d) A porno scene between a GWAR member in full costume and a profoundly unhappy young lady

4) Security guards did not have to do which of the following?

a) Tackle a guy in a Speedo and giant GWAR foam fingers who somehow made his way on stage

b) Team up four to a man to eject the occasional unruly tank of a crowd surfer

c) Wear bibs to guard against the spray of blood and other bodily fluids (may have included synthetic substitutes)

5) Which of the following did not appear as a guest character?

a) Evil clown

b) Space turtle

c) Nine foot robot which inexplicably bleeds when impaled

6) Which of the following did I not see on a T-shirt?

a) "GWAR" (homemade, with puff paint)

b) GWAR goo (soaked, after the show)

c) "GWAR LIVES GWAR RULES" (also puff paint, also soaked)

d) "Abercrombie and Fitch"

7) Which of the following was not used as an excuse to spew fake blood into the crowd?

a) Cow being skinned alive

b) Michael Jackson in a spacesuit getting his face ripped off, naturally starting with the nose first

c) Deformed "sin baby" fetus being aborted

d) Obama being decapitated after presenting them with the "presidential medal of ass-kicking cool shit"

8) Drugs did not directly affect the performance in which of the following ways?

a) Giant white bale labeled "CRACK" presented to frontman Oderus Urungus during power ballad

b) Backstage webcam reveals that the encore only happened because they forgot their stash on stage

c) Occasional inability of band members to remember their lines

9) The finale did not include which of the following awkward elements?

a) A bouncy jazz number

b) An appeal for donations to a favorite charity

c) Raffling off the costumes one by one, with frontman Oderus Urungus awkwardly reading off long numbers corresponding to each of five winning raffle tickets and responding to crowd complaints by saying, "Look, we have to do this, because we took a dollar apiece for these things."

Answers: 1 - B, 2 - A, 3 - C, 4 - A, 5 - A, 6 - D, 7 - A, 8 - C, 9 - B.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.