I Serve at the Pleasure of President Bartlet: Celebrity Voices in 'Mass Effect 2'

It's the perfect example of casting to type for great effect, and it's why you pay extra for star power.

Yes, I'm blogging about Mass Effect 2 again. And I probably will next week too. I played through the whole game in four days, mostly in one very long Friday session of about 12 hours. I love this game, and I think it does a lot of interesting things, some of them maybe even ground breaking. Casting famous actors in lead roles is not by any means ground breaking and, indeed, might in some cases be seen as more of a publicity stunt than an artistic choice. Or maybe just a way for game developers to hang out with their favorite sci-fi celebs (I'm looking at you, Halo ODST using the cast of Firefly). Of course I have no idea how much publicity-minded planning played into casting Mass Effect 2, but I do know that some of those decisions had strong effects on how I experienced and even played the game.

There are a ton of sci-fi film and TV stars in Mass Effect 2, and I think they all do fine work. I'm concentrating here on those performances that made a difference for me in how I played the game or at least how I perceived it's story. I know that one should take each performance on its own merits and not let past, unrelated efforts influence my impression of the piece at hand, but come on, that's not how people work for the most part. Many stars are stars precisely because they bring along some good will and associations with them from role to role. Daniel Day Lewis manages to disappear completely into his characters, but he's a rare talent. George Clooney, on the other hand (who I like a lot), knows how to expertly exploit his own range and tweak the overall feeling of a cool, confident, leading man to match the needs of his current film. When you cast him in a movie, you do so knowing that he brings a lot of presence to the characters that a director then doesn't have to work quite so hard to establish.

Tricia Helfer as EDI

She's the cylon spy that you lust to hate from Battlestar Galactica, and, yes, she was also in Halo ODST, but here she's playing more to stereotype as an artificial intelligence. The big difference is that this time she's not an AI in a super model's body and she's probably, maybe a good guy. Everyone in the Mass Effect universe has strong suspicions about artificial intelligences, especially after the wars with the robotic geth. Helfer's associations with the nefarious Six from BSG lingered in my mind. Hers was a voice of temptation to disaster that I'd learned to distrust, and thus, it was all the easier for me to empathize with fears that giving EDI so much sway over the ship might have very bad consequences.

Seth Green as Joker

He was in the first game, and there I found Green's performance more distracting than helpful. For me, Dr. Evil's son and that kid from Can't Hardly Wait didn't belong on a starship, and while I know it's not fair, the thoughts and memories were in my head as I played. Plus, I was wondering what an episode of Robot Chicken about Mass Effect might be like. I actually think that he does a great job in Mass Effect 2, where he's both funnier and yet more of a real character than he was in the first Mass Effect. Green's fame worked against my acceptance of him in the first game even though the character was well tailored to his celebrity persona. Here's a case where I think that the actor's ability was able to transcend my other associations with him, especially as the game goes on and he's given some more dramatic material to work with.

Martin Sheen as The Illusive Man

This was the huge one for me. I love The West Wing, especially during the Sorkin years, and Martin Sheen's turn as President Bartlet is forever imprinted on my brain as the proper way for a modern American President to be -- brilliant, quick witted, passionate, and driven by a profound moral center. His one vice was a habit of sneaking cigarettes when under stress. His is the voice of reasoned but impassioned leadership, and clearly, The Illusive Man in Mass Effect 2 draws on this portrayal.

The Illusive Man is not someone that I wanted to trust as a player. He works from the shadows with a vague agenda and answers to no one. I'd read the prequel book, and I knew he was capable of some really nasty stuff, but then he comes on screen sounding all reasonable and presidential. It's like he's debating policy with Sam and Leo and Josh and Toby again, and I cannot deny that he is always right. Let the Illusive Man be the Illusive Man, I'm sure that he's thought about this more than I have. He's got a Nobel Prize in economics for goodness sake! And you know it's serious because he keeps smoking that cigarette, which President Bartlet only ever did when things were deadly serious.

I grant that my reaction is almost certainly atypical. Most gamers aren't the huge West Wing fanatics that I am, but that's why it's such great bit of casting. Martin Sheen is an excellent actor and does terrific work as the Illusive Man, work that any player can appreciate without having any idea what else he might have done. But for those familiar with his portrayal of Bartlet, the character has added and possibly unearned gravitas. I found myself giving him more of the benefit of the doubt and sticking up for him more than I would have otherwise. I think because, based on words and actions alone, he's up to some dubious shit. For me, it's the perfect example of casting to type for great effect, and it's why you pay extra for star power.

So if the mysterious Gillian from the Mass Effect: Ascension novel ever does show up in a game, I hope they cast Dakota Fanning. She's got some serious creepy little girl cred even if she is all grown up now.

Keythe Farley as Thane Krios

Okay, Farley's not famous at all although he's done a lot of voice work, and I didn't recognize his voice. In fact, I mistook him for actor James Remar who plays Dexter's father Harry on the television show Dexter. This had the interesting side-effect of me transferring much of Harry Morgan's world weariness and expertise onto the world weary expert assassin, Thane Krios. So maybe all developers really need to do is cast talented mimics in these roles, and they can get the same effect for half the cost. Something to think about...

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.