The Box

You can strip away all of the Kelly flourishes -- Steward's creepy “employees” and the sci-fi elements they bring to the movie -- and still wind up with a relatable human drama about upward mobility.

The Box

Director: Richard Kelly
Cast: Cameron Diaz, James Marsden, Frank Langella
Length: 115 minutes
Studio: Warner Brothers
Year: 2009
Distributor: Warner
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for thematic elements, some violence and disturbing images.
Release Date: 2010-02-23
“Your home is a box. Your car is a box on wheels. You drive to work in it; you drive home in it. You sit in your home staring into a box. It erodes your soul while the box that is your body withers and dies, whereupon it is placed in the ultimate box to slowly decompose.” -- Arlington Steward, The Box

The Box begins as a simple what-would-you-do thought experiment. A stranger arrives at your door with a box containing a “button unit”. He explains that you have a choice. You can push the button and receive a tax-free, million-dollar payment -- but someone in the world that you don’t know will die as a result. Or, you could send the box back and forget all about the button, no harm done to anyone.

Of course, in the hands of director Richard Kelly, even a simple thought experiment becomes not-so-straightforward. For starters, the box is delivered by Arlington Steward (Frank Langella), a serious and well spoken man who is missing half of his face. (How would that affect your decision?) He presents the box to Norma Lewis (Cameron Diaz, using a southern accent that seems to make her think hard about every word) and her husband, Arthur (James Marsden) in a 1976 Virginia suburb.

Norma and Arthur spend the remainder of the movie parsing the consequences of their decision, sending them on a particularly Kellyesque journey unraveling a conspiracy that has them contemplating everything from other worlds to the afterlife. As per usual, Kelly hinges parts of this story on information withheld from both his characters and his audience.

In this case, some hints could be gained from a handbook ominously titled the “Human Resource Exploitation Manual”, which was once available for download on the movie’s website but now appears to be nonexistent. (It seems like a sure thing to include the manual as a DVD extra, the way that the similarly fictional “The Philosophy of Time Travel” was included on the DVD for the director’s cut of Donnie Darko, but the bare-bones DVD doesn’t contain that or a commentary track for extra insight.) As the audience, we follow Norma and Arthur through these ominous and textured scenes, sharing in their suspense, picking up bits of information but never quite sure if they mean anything when they’re finally pieced together.

Then again, you can strip away all of the Kelly flourishes -- Steward's creepy “employees” and the sci-fi elements they bring to the movie -- and still wind up with a relatable human drama about upward mobility. The box is appealing to Norma and Arthur because they’re both strivers. Arthur especially -- he's applied to become, of all things, an astronaut on a mission to Mars. He makes it clear to his superiors that settling for a life at a mere managerial position is unacceptable to him.

Norma admits to a friend that they live “paycheck to paycheck” trying to maintain their suburban existence. She worries about how to afford the tuition at her son’s private school -- while Arthur drives around in a sleek-looking muscle-car.

Embedded in the labyrinthine sci-fi mystery is one central question: What are Norma and Arthur willing to do to advance their lifestyle? That leads to further questions: What are their neighbors willing to do to them for the same thing? Is this a cycle that can eventually be stopped or escaped?

That seems to be the question put forth by Richard Matheson in “Button, Button”, the story that became the inspiration for The Box. On the DVD, Matheson is the only one who really gets to comment on the story. In the special feature, “Richard Matheson: In His Own Words”, he talks about his inspiration for the story and his career in general. (Kelly makes an appearance, but only to talk about the influence Matheson has had on sci-fi nerds.) It’s a pleasant interview, but, as the only special feature, the DVD leaves most of the questions raised by Matheson and Kelly without any clear answers.

Like the “Human Resource Exploitation Manual”, you know they’re out there -- but you’re just going to have to be satisfied with what you can piece together yourself.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.