Keke Wyat: Who Knew?

Who Knew? reintroduces the public to a terrific R&B singer, though it's not quite the smash it should be.

Keke Wyatt

Who Knew?

Label: Shanachie Entertainment
US Release Date: 2010-02-23
UK Release Date: 2010-02-23
Label Website
Artist Website

Keke Wyatt is among a slew of R&B sisters (which includes Sunshine Anderson, Tweet, Blu Cantrell, and Syleena Johnson) that emerged in the new millennium to provide an alternative to the fast-food pop diva and the so-called neo-soul sister. She debuted on a couple of duets with male R&B singer Avant and then released her solo debut, Soul Sista, in 2001. The album eventually sold more than 500,000 copies.

Who Knew? comes after nine years of label changes, promotional singles, leaked songs, false starts, and personal problems that left fans of the songstress thinking that she’d never release a proper album again. Wyatt is clearlyaware of this fact, as she has crafted an album that is designed to let everyone know that she is here to stay. Who Knew? is built around Wyatt's gospel-reared, wonderfully versatile voice, which, mostly, works out in fine, if uninspiring, fashion.

First single and title track "Who Knew?", written by R&B star Tank (who by now should really be a much much bigger star) and produced by the Underdogs, sets the tone for most of the album. It's a standard Underdogs track that puts all the attention on Wyatt's lead vocal. There are three other Underdogs contributions, the best of which is "Weakest", which strikes the right note of longing (despite a slightly overwrought vocal mix on the hook). All four Underdogs contributions are pretty standard R&B fare, and while pretty, offer little challenge to Wyatt.

Lucky then that Wyatt decided to pick up the pen and write a couple of gems herself: "Never Give Up" and "Daydreaming". The stronger of the two, "Daydreaming", is built around a simple snare loop and its sharply observant lyrics -- "I know it ain’t right for me / To be thinkin' bout loving you / I can't tell my heart how to be / Is it cheating 'cause I'm daydreaming" -- capture just the right reflective tone to sell the song's meaning. It also has a simply gorgeous bridge that gives Wyatt the chance to vocalize to stunning effect. Album closer "Never Give Up" reunites Wyatt with Steve Huff, who wrote and produced Wyatt's debut album, and shows that the two still have really good chemistry.

But it's Wyatt's cover of Rachelle Ferrell's "Peace on Earth" that really showcases just how great a singer Wyatt can be when she has the right song. Unsurprisingly, it's become something of a sensation online and here it is the album centerpiece. Tackling a song by Ferrell takes real guts -- Ferrell is, without question, the finest jazz singer of her generation and a virtuoso -- but Wyatt does a terrific job, turning the song into a straight ahead soul jam.

At just 10 tracks, there isn't much room for filler on Who Knew? (though "Getting It" is really awful). But it does mean you have time to notice that the album has just one too many generic mid-tempo R&B songs that, though well-performed, make little impression after the first listen. Like far too many singers of her caliber, Wyatt mistakes the ability to sing anything with the belief that she should.

Still, Who Knew? proves that Wyatt is a terrific singer. But that doesn't necessarily mean this is a terrific album. It is not. But it is good enough to make Keke Wyatt a singer to watch.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.