Clint Eastwood: 35 Films 35 Years at Warner Bros. (clips)

Last week, a retrospective boxset entitled Clint Eastwood: 35 Films 35 Years at Warner Bros. was released. Dedicated to the film career of one of the greatest directors/actors in Hollywood history, the set is a summation of movies he is made in the past four decades. Unfortunately, the boxset includes only Warner Brothers pictures, so gone are classics like Sergio Leone's Dollar Trilogy (which included A Fist Full of Dollars, For a Few Dollars More and The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. However, there are still plenty of top notch flicks like Mystic River and Dirty Harry. See the full list, along with some clips of Eastwood, below.

1. Where Eagles Dare, 1968

2. Kelly's Heroes, 1970

3. Dirty Harry, 1971

4. Magnum Force, 1973

5. The Enforcer, 1975

6. The Outlaw Josey Wales 1976

7. The Gauntlet, 1977

8. Every Which Way but Loose, 1978

9. Bronco Billy, 1980

10. Any Which Way You Can, 1980

11. Honkytonk Man, 1982

12. Firefox, 1982

13. Sudden Impact, 1983

14. City Heat, 1984

15. Tightrope, 1984

16. Pale Rider, 1985

17. Heartbreak Ridge, 1986

18. Bird, 1988

19. The Dead Pool, 1988

20. Pink Cadillac, 1989

21. White Hunter, Black Heart, 1990

22. The Rookie, 1990

23. Unforgiven, 1992

24. A Perfect World, 1993

25. The Bridges of Madison County, 1995

26. Absolute Power, 1997

27. Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, 1997

28. True Crime, 1999

29. Space Cowboys, 2000

30. Blood Work, 2002

31. Mystic River, 2003

32. Million Dollar Baby, 2004

33. Letters from Iwo Jima, 2006

34. Gran Torino, 2008

35. The Eastwood Factor short film.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.