The Oscars: The Super Bowl of Egotism

Photo (partial) by ©Leonard Ortiz, courtesy MCT

Maybe we watch the Oscars because they remind us of our own high school days. Popularity and past work far outweigh the quality of work represented by the nomination.

I used to love the Oscars. I gorged on the hype which led up to the awards. I knew the pitiful stories behind every feature documentary. The Oscars easily capture a child's willing imagination. We watch the grown-ups who produce and portray our cinematic fantasies mingle together and celebrate themselves. The Dorothy Chandler Pavilion was a modern day Mt. Olympus, right here on Earth.

I don't get anywhere near that kind of charge from the Oscars, anymore. It isn't enough that we worship these screen actors as 25-foot deities? We also need to listen to their mortal selves thank their management?

Gods don't serve themselves. I understood Norma Desmond. I am big. It's the pictures that got small.

The Oscars are often posited as the female Super Bowl. That might be right. Start by focusing on fashion, with shout-outs to designers and dress talk. Combine that with the overwhelming, naked desire for self-validation which turns every red-carpet starlet into just another awkward teen. Pour over handsome men dressed in formal wear. Stir. Sit back and nitpick in between spoonfuls of Rocky Road.

I can't compare it to the Super Bowl, though. Athletes train their whole lives to arrive at the biggest stage. Professional athletics is a meritocracy. The best rise to the top, no matter if you were born in a Florida swamp or a swank Upper East Side palace. Very little separates winners from losers, and that which does is transparent and quantifiable.

Not so much with the Oscars. The show rewards the profession with the least impact on the finished film product, acting, with the greatest amount of credit and acclaim. Each individual actor thanks personal deities, uninvited blood relations, and script-reading managers without the faintest realization that any number of sentient beings can do their job

Not to mention that so many actors -- Robin Williams, Sigourney Weaver, Michael Douglas, Glenn Close, Matt Damon, Jeff Bridges -- are upper class twits who never worked areal job a single day of their lives.

Jealous? Sure. I wouldn't mind still getting an invite to the coolest party in the world even after films like Patch Adams and Jack stained my resume.

The Oscars telecast made some significant changes this year. In order to draw more people to actual cinemas, they increased the number of Best Picture nominees to ten. Stop the presses! The Oscars must be saved!

Not so much. The Academy members have a difficult enough time selecting five worthy films each year, let alone ten. Yes, the increase allowed an animated film (that should have won) and two science fiction films to crash the party. But it also allowed for a Sandra Bullock vehicle to boast of being one of the ten best.

Further, I don't know how many more people would see a film like A Serious Man in Winona, Minnesota if it isn't showing there.

These Oscars, more than any in memory, wanted to please every demographic, except seniors (who don't consume anything and therefore exist only to vote). They attempted to appeal more to the tween market by inviting presenters who individualize America's junior-high lockers. Krisitn Stewart, Zac Ephron, The Other Dude From New Moon all gawked and stumbled through their first red carpet experience. I don't know if it succeeded, but it left the Rockista and I asking ourselves often “Who the heck is that?”

The Oscars gave us Gen X-ers a tribute to John Hughes. Before I could agree on whether Hughes deserved his own tribute, it went all Celebrity Rehab on me when representatives from the Hughes Child Actors Guild appeared on stage.

Wow. Note to Mr. Nelson: You could have gotten your point across just as well by writing 'Eat Me' on an undershirt and saved yourself from having to steal the clothes off a bum.

Co-hosts Evil Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin provided the baby-boomer appeal. I don't know what happened to Martin during the '90s, but all the whimsy has left his humor. He is almost an entirely different comedian now, trading in cynicism and meanness.

Alec Baldwin, on the other hand, is enjoying a career renaissance with an on-going bit almost as challenging as Steven Colbert's 'Steven Colbert'. Baldwin, with his 'Alec Baldwin', mines our public suspicions about his character brought on my by the tabloid coverage of the past to construct a hard-to-resist offensive snob I've read that Baldwin does not embrace this success, and this hesitancy makes it even more effective. He'.s not begging for laughs, so we laugh more.

Cut from the telecast were the lifetime achievement awards. Lauren Bacall, Gordon Jenkins, and some other dude received these awards at a separate event which looked way more lively than what we were force fed. Whoever thought that a Lauren Bacall speech wouldn't be entertaining probably lists The Breakfast Club in their personal top ten.

Even with the cuts, the Oscars ran long. The Rockista and I did not know who won the last three awards until the next morning because Comcast has yet to figure out how to keep their DVRs from cutting off live events. I'm sure there a lot of unemployed people who would be willing to sit someplace to send a signal toward the receivers extending time for sports and other live events.

We missed the Poor Man's Julia Roberts', Sandra Bullock, .acceptance speech for her Best Actress win. I'm not going to see The Blind Side, but I find it impossible to believe that Bullock gave the best lead actress performance of the year.

And there lies the Oscars' biggest problem. Since actors make up such a gigantic percentage of Academy voters, the whole evening becomes nothing more than a trade-school student council election. Popularity and past work far outweigh the quality of work represented by the nomination. In fact, maybe that is the whole point. Maybe we watch the Oscars because they remind us of our own high school days.

The highlight of the evening happened at such speed you may have missed it. After Monique completed her own pitch for artistic and civil-right sainthood, the camera closed in on Samuel Jackson. Jackson glanced over at his neighbor, then turned toward the camera and rolled his eyes and shook his head in the universal “That bitch be crazy” look.

The lowlight was, for the 11th year running, Sarah Jessica Parker. Bill Hicks once believed that a national conspiracy was behind Whoopi Goldberg's success. I believe there must be a national conspiracy behind Sarah Jessica Parker. How is this woman a sex symbol and fashion icon? I, and most other men, tuned Sex and the City out right after we realized that the sex revolved around her. Maybe the fashion world loves her because she provides such a unique challenge: How much of her can we cover up while still allowing for her to be recognized?

I must admit I am a huge fan of a few of her performances. First, her '80s turns in Square Pegs and Girls Just Want to Have Fun (which also contains Helen Hunt's best work). Second, her on-going success as Matthew Broderick's beard. No wonder she wants to do more Sex and the City sequels.

Next year, they should keep the co-host idea, but it should be Meryl Streep and Jack Nicholson. Let them improvise whatever they want. Build a variety show around them. Make sure you bring Ben Stiller back. Bring back five films for best picture, and focus the telecast around them. Don't let anyone dance.

Do not let an actor give an acceptance speech. Bring back the life-time achievement awards. Let the subjects of the documentaries accept the awards. Show the shorts during the telecast. Instead of a glorified trailer, have the cast of the best picture nominees improvise their film in three minutes or less. Have an act-off for the acting categories where they must reprise one of their competitor's roles live. Make sure the show ends in three hours and finally, once again -- no dancing!

Photo (partial) by © Robert Gauthier courtesy MCT

From genre-busting electronic music to new highs in the ever-evolving R&B scene, from hip-hop and Americana to rock and pop, 2017's music scenes bestowed an embarrassment of riches upon us.

60. White Hills - Stop Mute Defeat (Thrill Jockey)

White Hills epic '80s callback Stop Mute Defeat is a determined march against encroaching imperial darkness; their eyes boring into the shadows for danger but they're aware that blinding lights can kill and distort truth. From "Overlord's" dark stomp casting nets for totalitarian warnings to "Attack Mode", which roars in with the tribal certainty that we can survive the madness if we keep our wits, the record is a true and timely win for Dave W. and Ego Sensation. Martin Bisi and the poster band's mysterious but relevant cool make a great team and deliver one of their least psych yet most mind destroying records to date. Much like the first time you heard Joy Division or early Pigface, for example, you'll experience being startled at first before becoming addicted to the band's unique microcosm of dystopia that is simultaneously corrupting and seducing your ears. - Morgan Y. Evans

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.