Precious Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire

Precious is neither a rags to riches story nor is it a relentlessly bleak portrait of a miserable life. Thanks to Gabourey Sidibe, Precious herself is as funny and charming as she is angry and depressed.

Precious Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire

Director: Lee Daniels
Cast: Gabourey Sidibe, Mo'Nique, Paula Patton, Lenny Kravitz,Mariah Carey
Distributor: Lionsgate
Rated: R
Release Date: 2010-03-09

If you’ve missed the phenomenon that is Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire, you’ve been living in a media vacuum for the past six months. Precious has fixed its place as one of the most important films of 2009 due in large part to performances by leads Gabourey Sidibe and Mo’Nique.

Precious is now available on DVD and includes interviews with Sapphire, director Lee Daniels and executive producers Oprah and Tyler Perry. The book and the film are based on the experiences of African American poet and novelist Sapphire when she worked as a teacher in Harlem during the '80s. Sapphire asserts that Precious is not about specific student, but rather an amalgam of many young women.

Claireece Precious Jones (Sidibe) is 16-years-old, illiterate, pregnant by her father for the second time and expelled from junior high. She lives with her abusive (emotionally, sexually, and physically) mother Mary (Mo’Nique). Precious is also obese, and late in the film learns that she’s HIV positive. After Precious is removed from school she starts studying at an alternative program called Each One Teach One. Here, she meets the encouraging and dedicated teacher Ms. Blue Rain, and a cohort of other tough-talking low-income girls.

Precious is neither a rags to riches story nor is it a relentlessly bleak portrait of a miserable life. Thanks in large part to Sidibe, Precious herself is as funny and charming as she is angry and depressed. The film is shot vérité style on digital cameras lending gritty realism to Mary’s filthy apartment, the fluorescent-lit welfare office, and grim streets. These scenes are juxtaposed with Precious’ fantasy world where she escapes when reality gets to be too much—like when she’s being raped by her father or beaten by her mother. In Precious’ fantasies, she’s a celebrity—well dressed, fawned upon, posing in the glare of flashbulbs. She’s bubbly, she giggles, and she’s cute -- not too far off in fact, from the real Gabourey Sidibe.

The fantasies help achieve the film’s main agenda: Precious is not someone to ignore. She’s just like the rest of us who occasionally cope with our lives by pretending we are otherwise—giving earnest Oscar acceptance speeches to the bathroom mirror or daydreaming about hot dudes on red motorcycles Though she lives in darkness, Precious is hopeful. In voiceover narration she talks about wanting to be a good mother to her children, her desire to succeed academically, and her conviction to break away from Mary.

Daniels wants viewers to like Precious, but not to pity her, and he emphasizes this by presenting Precious as a regular girl who happens to inhabit horrific circumstances. Any lesser performance than Sidibe’s would have made this self-identification seem cloying or forced, but Precious isn’t either of those things. s a character, she’s heartbreaking and wonderful.

No less affecting is Mo’Nique in her portrayal of a monster, Precious’ abusive and tragic mother. Mo’Nique has received due praise for her performance (hello, Oscar) and I add my voice to the many who have sung her praises. Oprah has called Mo’Nique “fearless” in her performance, and this is apt. Playing evil is not easy, playing evil believably is harder still, and Mo’Nique’s Mary is spot on: chilling, pitiable and reviled all at once.

Lee Daniels and executive producers Oprah and Tyler Perry clearly see the film as a vehicle for social change. As Oprah puts it in one special features interview, she said to Daniels “Tell me what I can do. I am a busy woman. I certainly don’t go looking for things to do… But in this case, I felt differently.” Tyler Perry is interviewed about bringing his substantial African American fan base to the film, and his reservations about doing so because of the film’s content and profanity.

Viewers of Precious seem to fall roughly into two camps: those who subscribe to Oprah’s version of the story as an empowering message for the disenfranchised particularly those who are poor, female and black. Critics of the film contend that it portrays urban blacks as obese, abusive and uneducated stereotypes. They argue that the film makes generalizations about African Americans that may be taken at face value by whites and blacks alike. This op-ed (Felicia R. Lee, New York Times 20 November 2009) speaks to the debate about black representation in the media and the advent of Precious.

It’s true that Precious isn’t always nuanced. Her relationship with her teacher, Ms. Rain, at times comes across as over-simplified and caricatured. Ms. Rain is an archetypal ray of patient, literate light in Precious’ life—and it’s not irrelevant that she’s quite beautiful and light-skinned. Mariah Carey (in an attempt to apologize to the world for Glitter) does a better job of portraying how complicated it is to help Precious in her much smaller role as a social worker at the welfare office.

Perhaps these broad strokes are part of the point. The message of Precious is intended to be a populist one; Oprah in particular makes her intentions in her distribution and support of the film very clear. If Precious is sometimes obvious in order to convey its message, this is entirely intentional. Precious’ inner strength and adherence to hope are the center of the film’s agenda—Sapphire, Daniels, Oprah et al want us to read it this way. Precious’ ultimate belief in hope itself is more important to the film than avoiding clichés, which might be impossible to circumvent regardless.

Precious is a well-told story that provokes difficult questions about portrayal of race and class in the media. The cultural conversation is richer for its inclusion.

The special features portion of the disc includes interviews with Sapphire, Lee Daniels, Gabourey Sidibe, Mo’Nique, Paula Patton (who plays Ms. Rain) Mariah Carey, Tyler Perry and Oprah. The interviews (heavy on Daniels and Sapphire) provide further context and depth about the representation of blacks in the media, and are worth watching. There’s a section about the arduous process of finding the right actress for the role of Precious, and a commentary with Daniels.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.