BBC miniseries 'Life' is a stunning look at survival

Verne Gay
Newsday (MCT)

REASON TO WATCH: The BBC Natural History Unit strikes again! Oprah Winfrey narrates.

WHAT IT'S ABOUT: Four years in the making, 11 hours in the viewing, the one consistent bedrock theme that ties all of "Life" together is survival. How do species adapt to survive? What are some of their unique skills and strategies? Or, as Winfrey observes, "in life there are no guarantees ... survival has always been a struggle, and one demanding extraordinary ingenuity."

Sunday's first hour (8-9 p.m. EDT) is a grab-bag of ingenuity. We see cheetahs taking down an ostrich; a Venus flytrap doing its thing; an insect that grows eyes on long projections because, as Winfrey tells us, "the female loves a bug with really long stalks."

MY SAY: To observe that Discovery/BBC's 2006 "Planet Earth" was among the most beautiful and hypnotic creations in the history of television verges on understatement. It was landmark TV that took full advantage of advances in photographic technology and a newfangled one called "high definition." Sadly — and perhaps unfairly — the equally gorgeous "Life" seems a little old hat by comparison. It's more intimate in scale — in recognition that most life on earth is intimate in scale — and faster-paced.

"Life," like life, doesn't tarry. The octopus that dies after spending a year nursing 100,000 eggs under the watchful gaze of a BBC camera? Her close-up lasts just about four minutes, and then on to the next story of survival. Meanwhile, Winfrey proves that she really is good at everything TV-related. Her voice is soothing and warm — plus, there's undeniable pleasure to be had in hearing the Queen of All Media declare that "the pebble toad isn't the only hungry creature wandering the Tepui of Venezuela."

BOTTOM LINE: Another stunning beauty — but you may have the sneaking suspicion you've seen some of this before in other nature documentaries that revel in the life-and-death struggles of the veldt, or deep sea, or Tepui of Venezuela.



Sundays at 8 p.m. EDT on Discovery, this Sunday through April 18.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.