Breaking Bad: Season Three Premiere

Jesse Hicks

The subtext that makes Breaking Bad both enthralling and often unbearable to watch is that Walt is becoming who he always was.

Breaking Bad

Airtime: Sundays, 10pm ET
Cast: Bryan Cranston, Aaron Paul, Anna Gunn, Bob Odenkirk, Dean Norris, BJ Mitte, Betsy Brandt
Subtitle: Season Three Premiere
Network: AMC
Director: Vince Gilligan
Air date: 2010-03-21

For two seasons of Breaking Bad, high school chemistry teacher Walter White (Bryan Cranston) has been cooking and selling crystal meth. From the time he learned he was dying of cancer, Walt and his partner, Jesse (Aaron Paul) have bumbled and scraped their way into becoming major players in the New Mexico drug trade -- in the name of providing for Walt's family. Last season, when Walt's cancer went into remission, it took with it his apparent financial motivation. But he kept on, and ended the season alone, rejected by his family and his partner, as wreckage literally rained down around him.

As Season Three began on 21 March, it looked like this Walt -- not the family man or the attentive teacher, but the lone survivor -- has been the real Walter White all along.

It makes psychological sense that Walt would find himself alone. He's repeatedly shown himself to be a radical individualist with a streak of self-hatred -- as he believes he hasn't adequately stewarded his intelligence, having failed to parlay a Nobel Prize in chemistry into money, stability, and security for himself and his family. As he seeks redemption by providing for that family after his death, Walt lives by a code of masculine stoicism. He consistently refuses offers of help (when he sneered that one such proposal was "Charity," his wife, Skyler (Anna Gunn), wondered, "Why do you say that like it's a dirty word?"). His pride easily slides into anger at those he believes have not lived up to their potential. He disdains them as he hates himself, pushing his students to do more with their talents and demanding that Jesse work ever harder.

The cycle seemed to come to an end as Season Three premiered, though Walt worked hard to deny it. "We are happily married," he declared when served with divorce papers. "I am happily married. I am happy." Similarly, when Skyler called him a drug dealer, he equivocated: "Methamphetamine. I manufacture. I'm not a dealer." At every turn, he sought to maintain a socially acceptable persona while continuing to act with impunity, as though his actions didn't have consequences.

Of course, he must learn otherwise. A drug overdose he allowed to happen indirectly led to a mid-air airplane collision above his house. Asked to speak at a memorial assembly at the high school, he laid out his own calculus of tragedy. The crash was only the 53rd deadliest air crash in history, tied for 53rd, actually. "First of all, nobody on the ground was killed and that ... I mean, an incident like this in a popular urban center? I mean, that's got to be a minor miracle," he said, "Plus, neither plane was full."

He went on, "We will get past this. Because that is what human beings do: we survive. We survive and we overcome." He tried to convince Jesse, who was blaming himself for the overdose and consequent crash, but Walt's argument bottomed out absurdly when he declared, "Really, I blame the government." Jesse would have none of it, announcing instead that he had accepted himself as the "bad guy" in the story. His rehab counselor advised, "Self-hatred, guilt: it just stands in the way of true change."

Walt hates himself too much to change. He believes he is someone else, or that he can become someone else. Toward the end of the episode, he visited his business partner, Gus (Giancarlo Esposito), a man who's dealt for 20 years but still remains a "ghost" to the authorities. "I'm making a change in my life is what it is," Walt said, "And I'm at something of a crossroads and it's brought me to a realization. I'm not a criminal. No offense to any people who are, but... this is not me."

But he is a criminal. Perhaps the most disturbing possibility -- the subtext that makes Breaking Bad both enthralling and often unbearable to watch -- is that Walter is becoming who he always was. He hasn't changed. He's been purified. After burning away the extraneous pieces of his life, his family and his partner, he's now revealed as a man who was always alone.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.