"An Adult Person": An Interview with Gareth from Los Campesinos!

Ian Mathers
Photo: Jon Bergman

In four years, Los Campesinos! have put out three albums, toured the world several times, and become critically-adored indie-rock darlings. So why is Gareth Campesinos! still obsessed with gloom and doom? Atheism, meeting fans expectations, and an aversion to their poppier early songs all make up this insightful interview.

Los Campesinos!

Romance Is Boring

Label: Arts & Crafts
US Release Date: 2010-01-26
UK Release Date: 2010-02-01
Artist website

Over the last few years, the output of Wales-based septet Los Campesinos! has put most of their contemporaries to shame.

Not only have they released an attention-getting debut EP, three excellent albums (although they'd tell you the middle one, 2008's We Are Beautiful, We Are Doomed, is merely an "extended EP"), and one of the best non-LP singles in recent memory ("The International Tweexcore Underground"), but the band has also displayed a range and progression in these releases (to say nothing of their always-inspiring live show) that has been both dramatic and assured. This year's Romance Is Boring saw the band move into darker, more personal territory with aplomb, sonic and lyrical prowess fully intact. Although there's nothing quite like "The Sea Is a Good Place to Think About the Future" or "Plan A" on the band's earlier records, after a few listens Romance Is Boring sounds like nobody but Los Campesinos!, and that's a very good thing. Recently the band's always eloquent and self-deprecating frontman Gareth Campesinos! talked to PopMatters about God, songwriting, death, and growing up -- you know, being in a band.


So how are things? Did the recent UK tour go well?

Yes thanks, it was great. Most extensive UK tour we've done in a while, whilst still missing out a lot of the bigger cities. Played London, of course, and it was probably the best show we've ever played, not necessarily ... music wise, but, as far as the crowd reaction and sheer euphoria went, it'll be pretty hard to top.

Is part of that down to the new songs?

Probably. It feels like being a proper band now that we can play shows and drop some of the songs that people like, haha. The reaction to the new stuff has been completely overwhelming. Songs like "Straight in at 101" and "The Sea Is a Good Place to Think About the Future" have been sung along to every night, and people have actually been cheering when I introduce "Letters From Me to Charlotte" which is completely unexpected.

I wanted to talk about that reaction a bit -- were you guys worried people wouldn't like the change in ... I'm not sure what to say, tone?

Not at all. I mean, naturally, it's nice if people like the songs, and I'd never, ideally, want someone who was a big fan to hear a new record and hate it but, there are more important things. Like, keeping ourselves happy, and making music that we believe in and feel passionate about. I don't think you're really meant to say that as a musician. I just read E from Eels' autobiography (Things the Grandchildren Should Know by Mark Oliver Everett). I actually got it as a gift from a really cool kid at a show the other day, and he said a lot of things that as a musician you're not meant to say, but are totally true. And one of them was how he was always surprised when he made a slightly different sounding album that people would react badly, or like they were owed something that sounded similar. I think all we can do is be honest.

That's interesting, because on the one hand you guys clearly not only have a really devoted group of fans but you've got a very good, close relationship with those fans. Do you think that they are less likely to react badly to changes like that because they're more, in a sense, involved?

I think it works both ways. There will be some who totally want us to push ourselves, because they feel invested, and they want to come on this journey with us, as we learn to write and create differently. But there will also be those who think that we're cheating by not making music like that which attracted people to us initially, like we're cheating them in some way. It's probably worth mentioning that I don't feel like what we've done on Romance Is Boring is a million miles away from Hold on Now, Youngster.... And it's also funny how equal amounts of people have said that we've simply refined the HON,Y... sound, or that we've created a very similar record, as have said that we've made some sort of drastic change in our sound. I find that quite funny. And complete justification for me to avoid trying to second-guess anyone at all, and just write how we want to write.

How do you guys feel about the older material? I know you've mentioned things, possibly jokingly, along the lines of being relieved not to have to play certain songs, I'm pretty sure I was at a show where you swore to never play "We Throw Parties, You Throw Knives" again. I know it's not necessarily as if you think newer or older songs are 'better,' but is there a feeling that you've progressed?

A lot of my issues, if not all of them are just with the lyrics to earlier stuff. Most stuff I've written since then has been very honest and emotionally draining. And to perform that kind of material (and I do put a lot into it, physically and emotionally when we play) and for it then to be broken up with something like "We Throw Parties," seems weird and dishonest almost. I wasn't being myself then. I think I was trying too hard.

Was there kind of a definite break where you were able to stop trying too hard and write more honestly?

I think that the point I was trying to be something I wasn't, was just when the band started receiving attention, at the very start. I wasn't used to it, and had never written a song thinking anyone was actually gonna hear it, before. And then I got to thinking "what do people want to hear?" Which is a mistake for any band I think.

What helped you move away from that? Just having people listening for long enough?

I've no idea really. Perhaps the realization that if you attempt to please anyone, if they don't like it, you're damaging yourself. So the only person you can really attempt to please is yourself. And I grew up a lot in that year or so period, changed and developed a lot as a person. An adult person. Of course, the best case scenario is you make something that you personally love, and then others like it too. That's the jackpot, and I'm really happy that by and large, people that like our band have remained so supportive.

I know with the last album you told me that people -- well, not people, journalists -- had kind of misread what the songs were about. And as you say you're not really worried about that on some level -- you're not going to let that effect what kind of music you make -- but does that still get frustrating?

Ummmm. I'm almost tempted to say I'm kind of at a point now where the songs are so detailed and honest that it's hard to misinterpret them. They're all pretty literal these days. I just get frustrated, with other bands' reviews as much as ours, that some music writers write in such definitive terms what the artist was intending, but really they more often than not have no idea.

There's a line in "I Warned You: Do Not Make an Enemy of Me" where Aleks sings "And if this changes your life, did you have one before?" So again, you guys clearly respect and like your fans, but is there a certain weariness there in terms of people relying too much on these songs that are, like you say, very personal for you?

That line's intended to be more self-deprecating to ourselves than confrontational, really. I do find it odd (and incredibly, incredibly flattering) that some people invest so much emotion and belief into the songs of seven or eight young adults that are as clueless and bumbling as they themselves are. I guess that's mocking us and them, to an extent.

I think those people invest so much partly because the songs do acknowledge that you're just as clueless and bumbling as we are, though, even as they make that sort of existence feel ... if not heroic, at least worthwhile. Is writing so personally partly a way to deal with things for you? I know at least some listeners find the songs cathartic or helpful.

Yeah, definitely. Especially on this last record. And the things to do with death and religion, they're things that I can't or don't want to talk about outside of the band, generally speaking, and the songs are a way of getting them off my chest. The love and sex stuff, I'm pretty open about in real life, I suppose.

I do think it's interesting that RIB is the first Los Campesinos! album to really tackle those subjects. I know you work(ed?) in a cemetery when not doing band stuff, and some of the lines in "Who Fell Asleep In" talk about the rows of gravestones as being in a way inviting. Is that related at all to the part at the end of "In Media Res" where you talk about dying (relatively) young and happy?

Yeah, totally. The lyric is "when I see the cemetery I don't see headstones, I see rows of engraved headstones, hungry waiting for me." I don't like the lack of control.

How so?

Like, you go through life taking care of your own shit, making your own mistakes and making the good things happen for yourself. And death's some thing you can't really control. It just happens. Doesn't seem like a cool deal.

Does that issue of control relate to the sort of skepticism you seem to have towards religion?

I don't know if I am skeptical of religion really. I know it's not for me, but if it comforts other people I'm not pig-headed enough to want to take that away from them. I'd not go up to someone and say, "I don't believe in your God" any more than I'd not expect someone to try to turn me onto theirs. At this moment in time I'm unsure of if I don't believe in a God, or if I do and just hate him/it.

I'd been hearing "it pains me, but I'm sure she's still yours" in "Who Fell Asleep In" as directed at God, which suggests the latter, although I may be way off.

Yeah, that's where it's directed. But, that doesn't necessarily suggest the latter, not to me. 'Cos if the girl believes in him, then he's real.

So if God did/does exist, why would/do you hate him?

I just think he's done some pretty shitty things. It's not really something I can explain. If I could I don't think I'd be wasting my ideas in pop songs. Haha.

I think it might seem from the outside that as the songs have gotten more personal they've also gotten darker ... do you think that's true?

Yeah, I think that's fair to say. I think, because of early subject matter and the often upbeat nature of the music, a lot of folk have always expected me to be some upbeat party guy, which isn't the case. I mean, I love to get drunk and have fun with my friends and to enjoy things, but, y'know…

With your early work, one of the reasons it was great was that the songs were really positive and upbeat in form without necessarily being that way in content -- you had these neat moments where something like "When the smaller picture / Is the same as the bigger picture / You know that you're fucked" becomes kind of uplifting. I think you guys still do that sort of thing, if a bit differently.

Yeah, I'd agree. I mean, I think there are always these glimmers of light, because if I couldn't find them there'd be no point in writing it.

Does a song like "Romance Is Boring" necessarily mean you're cynical now? Is there an element of self-mockery there as there is in the "if this changes your life..." line?

"Romance Is Boring" is a crack of light, I guess. It's more of a hotchpotch of ideas that fit in with the record. I guess it's a call for excitement, and for romance really. I'm kidding myself there.

How does the rest of the band feel about the shift in songwriting? I'm assuming the corresponding shift in the music (becoming more complex and so on) is a group thing, and it certainly fits the darker, more personal lyrics.

Well, the songs are primarily written by myself and Tom, so I suppose we hold more control over the direction the band goes in. But certainly, there have been no dissenting voices within the camp. I think everyone's at a point where they want to push themselves as much as possible to test themselves as musicians and to allow the band to be everything it has the potential to be. It seems a natural way for us to progress, I think. And as we've grown up, our interests have changed I suppose. We're not really the same group of kids who were buoyed by the excitement of writing songs and skipping lectures that we were four years ago. I think if anybody ever questioned what I was writing lyrics about (generally, rather than objecting to one specific lyric or something) then it'd put us all in a difficult position.

Do you think it's fair to say that a lot of your songs struggle with the question of whether it's better to be happy but ignorant or miserable but aware, or maybe more generally just struggling with the latter condition? Even the end of "In Media Res", with "If you were given the option of dying painlessly in peace at 45 / But with a lover at your side, after a full and happy life / Is this something that would interest you? / Would this interest you at all?," seems very much like a quality versus quantity kind of question.

I've never really though of it like that, but I think that's a fair synopsis of my writing. The happier, more hopeful songs do have a certain ignorance, or, innocence, to them, and the rest of the time it seems like I'm combating a doom that I'm well aware of. I suppose that's what I'm like in life though. I think and worry too much. To a stupid, almost childish level. I can be having the most fun and suddenly I'll become stopped dead in my tracks by the thought that "shit, everybody I love is going to die" or something equally basic, and this doom just descends over me. I realize that's a stupid way to live and to think, but I'm not able to escape it at the moment.

Last question: Is "I can't believe I chose the mountains every time you chose the sea," in context, the saddest/most-heart wrenching line you've written?

Perhaps so. That lyric pretty much wraps up all the record's worries and insecurities. I think its exasperation and despair comes across pretty well, especially after what comes before on "Coda." I hope to have people weeping by this point. It's a weird thing, wanting to make people weep. One of the compliments people most frequently pay us is "your music makes me so happy" or "whenever I feel sad I listen to your music and feel better". How dare people get enjoyment out of my despair?


The Best Metal of 2017

Painting by Mariusz Lewandowski. Cover of Bell Witch's Mirror Reaper.

There's common ground between all 20 metal albums despite musical differences: the ability to provide a cathartic release for the creator and the consumer alike, right when we need it most.

With global anxiety at unprecedented high levels it is important to try and maintain some personal equilibrium. Thankfully, metal, like a spiritual belief, can prove grounding. To outsiders, metal has always been known for its escapism and fantastical elements; but as most fans will tell you, metal is equally attuned to the concerns of the world and the internal struggles we face and has never shied away from holding a mirror up to man's inhumanity.

Keep reading... Show less

In Americana music the present is female. Two-thirds of our year-end list is comprised of albums by women. Here, then, are the women (and a few men) who represented the best in Americana in 2017.

If a single moment best illustrates the current divide between Americana music and mainstream country music, it was Sturgill Simpson busking in the street outside the CMA Awards in Nashville. While Simpson played his guitar and sang in a sort of renegade-outsider protest, Garth Brooks was onstage lip-syncindg his way to Entertainer of the Year. Americana music is, of course, a sprawling range of roots genres that incorporates traditional aspects of country, blues, soul, bluegrass, etc., but often represents an amalgamation or reconstitution of those styles. But one common aspect of the music that Simpson appeared to be championing during his bit of street theater is the independence, artistic purity, and authenticity at the heart of Americana music. Clearly, that spirit is alive and well in the hundreds of releases each year that could be filed under Americana's vast umbrella.

Keep reading... Show less

Two recently translated works -- Lydie Salvayre's Cry, Mother Spain and Joan Sales' Uncertain Glory -- bring to life the profound complexity of an early struggle against fascism, the Spanish Civil War.

There are several ways to write about the Spanish Civil War, that sorry three-year prelude to World War II which saw a struggling leftist democracy challenged and ultimately defeated by a fascist military coup.

Keep reading... Show less

Beware the seemingly merry shades of green and red that spread so slowly and thickly across the holiday season, for something dark and uncertain, something that takes many forms, stirs beneath the joyful facade.

Let's be honest -- not everyone feels merry at this time of year. Psychologists say depression looms large around the holidays and one way to deal with it is cathartically. Thus, we submit that scary movies can be even more salutary at Christmas than at Halloween. So, Merry Christmas. Ho ho ho wa ha ha!

1. The Old Dark House (James Whale, 1932)

Between Frankenstein (1931) and The Invisible Man (1933), director James Whale made this over-the-top lark of a dark and stormy night with stranded travelers and a crazy family. In a wordless performance, Boris Karloff headlines as the deformed butler who inspired The Addams Family's Lurch. Charles Laughton, Raymond Massey, Gloria Stuart, Melvyn Douglas and Ernest Thesiger are among those so vividly present, and Whale has a ball directing them through a series of funny, stylish scenes. This new Cohen edition provides the extras from Kino's old disc, including commentaries by Stuart and Whale biographer James Curtis. The astounding 4K restoration of sound and image blows previous editions away. There's now zero hiss on the soundtrack, all the better to hear Massey starting things off with the first line of dialogue: "Hell!"

(Available from Sony Pictures Home Entertainment)

2. The Lure (Agnieszka Smoczynska, 2015)

Two mermaid sisters (Marta Mazurek, Michalina Olszanska) can summon legs at will to mingle on shore with the band at a Polish disco, where their siren act is a hit. In this dark reinvention of Hans Christian Andersen's already dark The Little Mermaid, one love-struck sister is tempted to sacrifice her fishy nature for human mortality while her sister indulges moments of bloodlust. Abetted by writer Robert Bolesto and twin sister-musicians Barbara and Zuzanna Wronska, director Agnieszka Smoczynska offers a woman's POV on the fairy tale crossed with her glittery childhood memories of '80s Poland. The result: a bizarre, funy, intuitive genre mash-up with plenty of songs. This Criterion disc offers a making-of and two short films by Smoczynska, also on musical subjects.

(Available from Criterion Collection / Read PopMatters review here.)

3. Personal Shopper (Olivier Assayas, 2016)

In the category of movies that don't explain themselves in favor of leaving some of their mysteries intact, here's Olivier Assayas' follow-up to the luminous Clouds of Sils Maria. Kristen Stewart again plays a celebrity's lackey with a nominally glamorous, actually stupid job, and she's waiting for a sign from her dead twin brother. What about the ghostly presence of a stalker who sends provocative text messages to her phone? The story flows into passages of outright horror complete with ectoplasm, blood, and ooga-booga soundscapes, and finally settles for asking the questions of whether the "other world" is outside or inside us. Assayas has fashioned a slinky, sexy, perplexing ghost story wrapped around a young woman's desire for something more in her life. There's a Cannes press conference and a brief talk from Assayas on his influences and impulses.

(Available from Criterion Collection / Reader PopMatters review here.

4. The Ghoul (Gareth Tunley, 2016)

The hero (Tom Meeten) tells his therapist that in his dreams, some things are very detailed and others are vague. This movie tells you bluntly what it's up to: a Möbius strip narrative that loops back on itself , as attributed to the diabolical therapists for their cosmic purposes. Then we just wait for the hero to come full circle and commit the crime that, as a cop, he's supposedly investigating. But this doesn't tell us whether he's really an undercover cop pretending to be depressed, or really a depressive imagining he's a cop, so some existential mysteries will never be answered. It's that kind of movie, indebted to David Lynch and other purveyors of nightmarish unreality. Arrow's disc offers a making-of, a commentary from writer-director Gareth Tunley and Meeten along with a producer, and a short film from Tunley and Meeten.

(Available from Arrow Video)

​5. The Illustrated Man (Jack Smight, 1969)

When a young man goes skinny-dipping with a mysterious stranger (Rod Steiger) who's covered with tattoos, the pictures comes to life in a series of odd stories, all created by Ray Bradbury and featuring Steiger and Claire Bloom in multiple roles. Nobody was satisfied with this failure, and it remains condemned to not having reached its potential. So why does Warner Archive grace it with a Blu-ray? Because even its failure has workable elements, including Jerry Goldsmith's score and the cold neatness of the one scene people remember: "The Veldt", which combines primal child/parent hostilities (a common Bradbury theme) with early virtual reality. It answers the question of why the kids spend so much time in their room, and why they're hostile at being pulled away.

(Available from Warner Bros.)

6. The Hidden (Jack Sholder, 1987)

In one of my favorite action movies of the '80s, a post-Blue Velvet and pre-Twin Peaks Kyle MacLachlan plays an FBI agent who forms a buddy-cop bond with Michael Nouri while pursuing a perp -- a bodiless entity that plugs into the human id. In the midst of slam-bang action comes a pivotal moment when a startling question is asked: "How do you like being human?" The heart of the movie, rich in subtext, finds two men learning to embrace what's alien to them. In pop-culture evolution, this movie falls between Hal Clement's novel Needle and the TV series Alien Nation. On this Warner Archive Blu-ray, Sholder offers a commentary with colleague Tim Hunter.

(Available from Warner Bros.)

7. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (David Lynch, 1992)

Speaking of Twin Peaks, here we have a textbook example of a movie that pleased almost nobody upon its release but has now generated such interest, thanks in large part to this year's Twin Peaks revival, that it arrives on Criterion. A feature-film prequel to David Lynch and Mark Frost's original TV serial that answered none of its questions and tossed in a raft of new ones, the film functions as one of cinema's most downbeat, disruptive and harsh depictions of a middle-class American teenage girl's social context. Sheryl Lee delivers a virtuoso performance that deserved the Oscar there was no way she'd be nominated for, and she wasn't. The extras, including a 90-minute film of deleted and alternate takes assembled by Lynch, have been available on previous sets.

(Available from Criterion Collection)

8. The Green Slime (Kinji Fukasaku, 1968)

Incredibly, Warner Archive upgrades its on-demand DVD of a groovy, brightly colored creature feature with this Blu-ray. As a clever reviewer indicated in this PopMatters review, what director Kinji Fukasaku saw as a Vietnam allegory functions more obviously as a manifestation of sexual tension between alpha-jock spacemen competing for the attention of a foxy female scientist, and this subconsciously creates an explosion of big green tentacled critters who overrun the space station. While we don't believe in "so bad it's good," this falls squarely into the category of things so unfacetiously absurd, they come out cool. There's a sublimely idiotic theme song.

(Available from Warner Bros.)

If the idea is that earth, water, fire, air and space constitute the core elements of life, then these five songs might seem as their equivalents to surviving the complications that come from embracing the good and enduring the ugly of the Christmas season.

Memory will never serve us well when it comes to Christmas and all its surrounding complications. Perhaps worse than the financial and familial pressures, the weather and the mad rush to consume and meet expectations, to exceed what happened the year before, are the floods of lists and pithy observations about Christmas music. We know our favorite carols and guilty pleasures ("O Come All Ye Faithful", "Silent Night"), the Vince Guaraldi Trio's music for 1965's A Charlie Brown Christmas that was transcendent then and (for some, anyway) has lost none of its power through the years, and we embrace the rock songs (The Kink's "Father Christmas", Greg Lake's "I Believe In Father Christmas", and The Pretenders' "2000 Miles".) We dismiss the creepy sexual predator nature in any rendition of "Baby, It's Cold Outside", the inanity of Alvin and the Chipmunks, and pop confections like "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus".

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.