Is There Anything Leondardo Da Vinci Couldn’t Do Brilliantly?

A lively, engaging book that acts as an excellent primer for anyone who wishes to acquaint, or re-acquaint herself with this extraordinary man.

Leonardo's Legacy: How Da Vinci Reimagined the World

Publisher: Da Capo
Author: Stefan Klein
Price: $36.00
Format: Hardcover
Translator: Shelley Frisch
Length: 291 pages
Publication Date: 2010-04

Is there anything Leondardo da Vinci couldn’t do brilliantly? Painting, sketching, engineering, mechanics, optics, medicine -- the ultimate Renaissance Man possessed a restless intellect that alighted everywhere and rarely stayed put for long, but managed to understand reality better than, perhaps, any human before him (and most of us since). Despite his flaws in understanding the nature of the universe, or maybe because of them, Leonardo comes down to us even after 500 years as a remarkable character, a man who created the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper, who designed nightmarish war machines and practical canal locks, who cut open dead bodies and drew pictures of what he saw, but who also took the time to buy caged songbirds for the sole joy of setting them free.

Leonardo’s Legacy is a book that celebrates the man in all his apparent paradoxical complexity. Although it contains few surprises for da Vinci scholars, it serves its purpose well: to remind interested non-experts of how extraordinary a man Leonardo was. As Stefan Klein puts it, the book "is not intended as a standard biography of a masterful artist as much as an attempt to get inside the mind of one of the most extraordinary individuals who ever lived—and to see the world through his eyes." To a large extent, the author succeeds in his task.

Much typical biographical information is absent here. There is little or nothing about Leonardo’s childhood, his education or his early adulthood. (A chronology in the Appendix provides a framework of dates and employers.) Instead, Klein focuses on a number of areas of interest that mystified, or perhaps plagued, da Vinci throughout his life: the flow of water, the secret of flight, the machinery of war, the ultimate mysteries of the human body. Klein’s contemplation of the Mona Lisa leads to a discussion of da Vinci’s study of optics, which had a direct bearing on the painting. da Vinci's relentless sketching of human faces -- he might follow an unsuspecting victim around town all day long, tossing off a multitude of sketches of his subject -- led to an understanding of facial musculature and a range of expression in, for example, the 13 figures of The Last Supper that his contemporaries were simply unable to match.

Leonardo was equally fascinated with water as with light, and his attempts to quantify the movement of liquids seems nothing short of heroic, given his complete lack of access to photographs or films to study; all he could do was look at a waterfall, a pond, a river, and try to understand how its various currents and eddies flowed. He drew studies of all this as well, seeking a predictable pattern of how liquid flowed in various circumstances. As with his study of ballistics, in which he observed the flight of airborne objects in order to predict the trajectory of cannonballs, he relied first and foremost on direct observation. Sight, for Leonardo, was where science began.

Flight, on the other hand, was where it nearly ended. Leonardo was stumped by how birds flew, despite his wrestling with the problem for decades; his many attempts to create a flying apparatus for a human being invariably failed. It happened because of the sight he so relied upon, which suggested through observation that birds flew by flapping their wings. His contraptions relied almost universally on this same principle. Crucially, lift is not created by flapping wings, but by air passing over the top of the wing more quickly than below it. This is why planes fly without flapping their wings. Tantalizingly, Leonardo did produce one or two sketches of a fixed-wing harness, something like a modern hang glider, which did not rely on flapping. There is no record of whether it was ever tried out by some brave test pilot.

Probably that is just as well, because speed is the other factor in the air-lift equation. When master glider Judy Leden tried a 21st-century reproduction of da Vinci’s design, she was able to glide for some 650 yards, but only after reaching a takeoff speed by running full tilt into the teeth of a storm. Anyone who tried Leonardo’s most likely means of launch, a standing start (perhaps jumping off the edge of a quarry), would have plummeted straight down.

Later in life, Leonardo’s relentless curiosity got him in trouble with the Church, as his dissections of human cadavers were prohibited as heresy. Even this did not dissuade him. Adept at snuggling up to rulers, despotic or otherwise, da Vinci used what contacts he could to lessen the heat. (He was friends with the Pope’s brother, which always helps.) His strong pragmatic streak shows, here as elsewhere, as he was not reluctant to cozy up to a martinet if it meant a steady income and the freedom to pursue his scientific and artistic work.

This book covers much more besides this: Leonardo led a life which resists summation, and he contemplated big questions of God and the human soul as well as more earthly concerns. Originally published in German, Leonardo’s Legacy has been capably translated by Shelley Frisch, and the result reads smoothly and naturally. Stefan Klein’s lively, engaging book is an excellent primer for anyone who wishes to acquaint, or re-acquaint herself with this extraordinary man.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.