Military Madness: Nectaris

Military Madness: Nectaris does everything it can to scare away whatever new audience it might appeal to.

Military Madness: Nectaris

Publisher: Hudson Entertainment
Rated: E10+
Players: 1 player
Price: $10.00
Platforms: XBLA (reviewed), WiiWare, OSN
Developer: Backbone
Release Date: 2010-04-12

Military Madness: Nectaris is the latest remake of an old TurboGrafx game that has seen a fair number of iterations over the years. Why do I bring this up? Because if you haven’t played one of those previous versions, this one is not for you. This game does everything that it can to scare away whatever new audience it might have found on XBLA, WiiWare, or PSN.

Military Madness: Nectaris is a turn-based strategy game played on a hex-based grid. To win, you either have to destroy all the enemy units or capture the enemy base. Factories are spread across each map and will give you additional units if captured, but the enemy can recapture them at any time, and any units currently inside will turn against you. It’s standard turn-based strategy for the most part, that is until you start to understand how the “zone of control” works.

The zone of control is the area immediately surrounding any friendly unit that no enemy unit can move through. What this means is that you can control the enemy’s movement by creating these “walls.” Of course, since these “walls” are made up of your own units, they can be destroyed, but sometimes it’s worth sending a small, fast unit to its death if it can prevent your opponent from entering a factory on his next turn. This is where much of the strategy lies in Military Madness: Nectaris. It’s not just about destroying units, but corralling them, cutting them off from potential backup and then destroying them. It’s common for both armies to meet at a factory in the middle of the map yet never capture it, even as units fall on both sides, because no ground troops (the only unit that can capture factories) are able to get through the zone of control.

This feature gives the game a great strategic depth, but a quick save option in the single player campaign encourages trial and error. You can save, make a move, and if it doesn’t work out like you wanted, then you load and try something else. On one hand, it saves you from the mind numbing frustration of having to play every level over from the beginning, but it also feels like a crutch put in to make up for poorly balanced teams and maps. There are some levels where the enemy starts out with an advantage either in unit strength or positions close to factories, and you’ll fall back on trial and error to pick at the defenses until you find a weak spot or get lucky. The zone of control still matters as it’s one of your major tactical tools, but it feels shortchanged here.

However, the first thing that you’ll notice when starting a new campaign is the utter lack of anything even resembling a tutorial. You’re just thrown into the game and expected to know how to play. There’s a help option in the pause menu, but that brings you to a list of 11 topics you have to read through to understand what’s going on. Even then you won’t learn everything. I still spent an annoying few minutes just trying to figure out how to move the cursor one hex at a time (you use the D-pad by the way). Unit information is in a whole other menu as well, and since it’s organized by unit type, looking up information on a unit that you know nothing about means slogging through sub-menu after sub-menu until you stumble upon the information you need.

In the beginning, you’ll get a new unit each level, but they all look so alike that you probably won’t even realize that it’s new until a few moves into the game when you select it and see its name. And thus begins yet another slog through the menus to see what this new thing does and what makes it different. It’s even worse it when the new unit is in a factory where you can’t see its range of movement. At one point I saw an Atlas in a factory and decided to deploy it so that I could play around with it. Turns out that it was a turret that can’t move on its own, it must be deployed into a transport vehicle to move, so upon deployment, it was stuck next to my base out of range of every enemy, a unit completely wasted. A quick load rectified the mistake, but it was annoying nonetheless. It would ease so much frustration if the game just flashed a notice when giving you new units. It could even display the same info already in the help menus. Just show it to me beforehand instead of making me look for it.

The multiplayer suffers from a similar flaw. It introduces a Commander unit and upgrades that change how the game is played, so all your time in the campaign won’t properly prepare you for multiplayer. Again you learn the facts from a menu that tells you want to do but not how to do it, so you’ll have to prepare to lose your first few online games while figuring out how to actually play. That is, if you can actually connect to a game, which is a rarity.

Military Madness: Nectaris constantly undermines itself. There’s a good strategy game hidden behind the quick save crutch and awful learning curve, but unless you’re dedicated to digging it out, you’ll probably get bored and angry long before you feel rewarded.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.