South Africa-based BLK JKS release an EP just in time for the World Cup.



Label: Secretly Canadian
US Release Date: 2010-06-08
UK Release Date: 2010-06-14
Artist Website

It's hard to imagine a better time for BLK JKS to be releasing an EP than right now. Tapped to perform at the first ever World Cup opening concert, BLK JKS are a perfect South African showpiece for a worldwide audience -- an indie rock powerhouse that goes beyond the kwaito and mbaqanga sounds that South Africa is primarily known for. Unfortunately (though not unexpectedly), the track getting the most publicity on ZOL! is the title track, an energetic but lightweight football chant that spends three minutes fighting against the essence of the other four tracks it's sharing space with. It's repetitive, ingratiating, and appropriately anthemic, but it simply does not mesh with the "typical" sound of BLK JKS, at least as that sound is exemplified by the rest of ZOL!.

Case in point: opener "Iietys", whose surreal Wonderland-esque imagery and near-formless song structure belie the insistent beat behind them. There's a bleak sense of helplessness to the song, a feeling that recurs throughout ZOL! with the exception of that momentum-jarring title track. "Bogobe" is a haze, eschewing percussion for dub-esque delay for its majority, eventually crashing into nothingness. "Paradise" is a lo-fi, angry take on Rush, while closer "Mzabalazo" is the band's take on an anti-apartheid chant, offering urgency and ferocity like nothing else on the EP.

Given the band's willing placement among the likes of Shakira and Black Eyed Peas at the World Cup concert, it's hard to tell whether they're trying to make some sort of political or social statement by placing the upbeat football anthem smack in the middle of all the bad vibes. What is clear is that BLK JKS is capable of much more than the call-and-response near-pandering of "ZOL!"; hopefully the rest of the world gets to hear everything else, too.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.