Deer Tick: The Black Dirt Sessions

Photo by Kendall Pavan

Deer Tick is far too talented to keep settling on making album rock for waking up cotton-mouthed in the back of a pick-up truck.

Deer Tick

The Black Dirt Sessions

Label: Partisan
US Release Date: 2010-06-08
UK Release Date: Import

John McCauley, the mastermind behind Rhode Island’s Deer Tick, always sounds like he’s straining himself. The parts he gives himself to sing rarely breach the vocal range of the shower-singing average Joe, and yet, every word he’s ever put to tape comes through my speakers like sex groans through a desk fan. I’d understand if that were just the way his voice was, but the heroic steadiness of his grungy whine makes it sound like he’s working to get there. It’s not a dealbreaker, but either you like it, or you don’t.

In fact, there’s a lot of either-you-like-it-or-you-don’t on Deer Tick’s latest, The Black Dirt Sessions. There’s a lot of it in Deer Tick, period. They approach Americana with the attitude of historians, or curators, but not exactly artists, or even entertainers, and as a consequence there’s very little in their work that might convert the unconverted. The main goal here appears to be perfecting an electric blend of country and folk, and that they do. Steel guitars and reverb, walking basslines, bluegrass sirens and answers at the bottom of whiskey bottles -- it’s a pitch-perfect retread of distinctly American 20th-century music.

Except for that voice. McCauley accentuates it as if ordered by the president of indie rock to manufacture quirks out of thin air. While hearing an unpretty warble singing the blues is far preferable to most pitch-corrected neo-Nashville nonsense, a lack of dynamism hurts McCauley. It’s plain to see that he listens to tons of Neil Young, the godfather of idiosyncratic country singing, so why he hasn’t picked up any of Shakey’s volatility and range is anyone’s guess.

It’s too bad, because a lot of The Black Dirt Sessions, like War Elephant and Born on Flag Day before it, is pretty good. This young band has an impeccable sense of both tone and songcraft, and, most importantly, the ability to balance between the two. As a result, a rootsy melancholy gravitates the hooks of gems like “I Will Not Be Myself”, “The Sad Sun”, and “Twenty Miles” without weighing those songs down.

The words, meanwhile, are largely an after-thought; except for a handful of canny phrases (my favorite: “I think of your smile / I’m in love with your teeth”), McCauley is an unremarkable lyricist. His hackneyed romances resemble the work of any number of cowboy troubadours so closely that they seem to exist only to do so. “Christ Jesus”, for example, is less Kris Kristofferson than Norman Greenbaum: McCauley invokes not Jesus the Son of Man, but Jesus the 20th century cultural touchstone. Like his music, McCauley’s lyrics choose mood over poignancy. The Black Dirt Sessions is exactly what it wants to be: album rock for waking up cotton-mouthed in the back of a pick-up truck.

But that voice! That corroded croon somehow hints that Deer Tick has higher ambitions than it ever achieves. A track like “Goodbye, Dear Friend” is masterfully evocative -- that is, until its moonshine-thin tale of grief gets underway, at which point it settles comfortably into being just another saloon ballad, for people who like that sort of thing. It becomes disappointing, and then frustrating, for people like me who like that sort of thing, but like being surprised even more. I’m not suggesting that they adopt hyper-literacy and become another Mountain Goats, and I’m not suggesting that they abandon their sound, either. I’m suggesting that John McCauley stop straining so hard to give us what he thinks we want, and give us instead, to paraphrase an old professor of mine, what we didn’t realize we wanted. He and his band are far too talented for us to settle for anything less.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.