Scissor Sisters: Night Work

Jer Fairall

Largely at a loss for genuine inspiration, Night Work mostly finds the Scissor Sisters resorting to familiar shtick, the result of which is a collection of songs that often feels as glib and shallow as their critics accuse them of being.

Scissor Sisters

Night Work

Label: Downtown
US Release date: 2010-06-29
UK Release date: 2010-06-28

There is an overall lack of animating passion to be found on Night Work, the third Scissor Sisters album, some barely tangible quality that would otherwise transform these songs into something inspired rather than something merely competent that is simply missing here. As unfair as it may be to hold the band’s biography against them, the circumstances surrounding the making of Night Work turn out to be especially telling: having spent a year and a half in the studio recording what was to be the follow up to Ta-Dah (2006), the band (whose original drummer Paddy Boom quit during this period, here replaced by the as-goofily-named Randy Real) ended up scrapping entirely the fruits of this labor, grabbing superstar producer Stuart Price (who had previously done some remixes for the band) to help put together what turns out to be exactly the by-no-means disastrous yet largely safe, middling and even exhausted-sounding effort that such a back story would suggest.

What makes Night Work so particularly disappointing is how it finds the Scissor Sisters coming off of two of the most dazzlingly brilliant pop albums of the previous decade. That Scissor Sisters (2004) and Ta-Dah landed on far fewer year-end lists than albums by such standard bearers of the 2000s Great Pop Integration as M.I.A., LCD Soundsystem or the New Pornographers is revealing of the skittishness on the part of so many rock critics when it comes to art that embraces bad taste (Eminem somehow notwithstanding), preferring higher brow cross-cultural mash-ups, hipster self-awareness and rockist nostalgia to Scissor Sisters’ gaudy pop fantasias. The tendency to relegate the band to the ghetto of camp, however, not only fundamentally misunderstands the crucial distinction between camp’s shallow smirkiness and genuine pop art but also shortchanges principle Scissor Sisters songwriters Jake Shears (also the band’s elastic, exciting main vocalist) and Babydaddy as savvy pop archivists very much at the level Maya Arulpragasam, James Murphy and Carl Newman.

If anything, the Scissor Sisters’ brand of pop culture love is an even more openhearted and widely embracing sort than that of their post-millennial peers. The band’s discofied take on Pink Floyd’s “Comfortably Numb”, largely misunderstood as a jokey provocation, was particularly indicative of their affectionate brand of pop satire, a cross-pollination of the “high” and “low” poles of the late '70s mainstream that mirrored the liberating erasure of stylistic boundaries found in 21st century pop music. Moments like the appropriation of the famous vocal breakdown from “Stayin’ Alive” in “Comfortably Numb” or the copping of a riff from Clapton’s “Layla” for the intro to “I Don’t Feel Like Dancing” (still the band’s best single) are not tarnishing of sacred cows but rather the work of a particular breed of postmodern animal, one with equal reverence for the whole of late 20th century popular culture. Think of the Scissor Sisters, if you will, as pop music’s equivalent to Tarantino’s stylistic merger of the French New Wave with '70s grindhouse cinema and you’re on track to understanding these guys’ particular brand of pop-savvy playfulness.

Night Work has no shortage of it’s own spot-the-reference moments, whether they are as vague as the punchy, aerobic title track’s resemblance to any number of early '80s Giorgio Moroder production or as up front as quote New Order’s “Temptation” (both in some offhand lyrical references and a distinctly Peter Hook-ian bass line) on the bounding, inexorable “Running Out”. That the latter also finds Jake Shears adopting a robotically nerdy Wall of Voodoo/Flock of Seagulls vocal affectation renders the song one of the few moments here to fully recall the rich pop palette of the previous two records. Elsewhere, though, Night Work rarely finds the band in anywhere near as ambitious a mood, with too many of these songs instead evoking what are by now familiar Scissor Sisters poses, rather than displaying the breadth of their knowledge and love of pop music. Where their previous two records held surprises at every turn, songs like “Harder You Get” and “Something Like This” feel rote and even tired, B-side caliber material no doubt used to fill out an album whose troubled history likely left the band, at least for the time being, hesitant to dabble much.

Largely at a loss for genuine inspiration, Night Work mostly finds the Scissor Sisters resorting to familiar shtick, the result of which is a collection of songs that often feels as glib and shallow as their critics accuse them of being. Start with that ridiculously tacky cover image and contrast it with the evocative ones that adorned the previous two records (a green pastoral wonderland opening up, reverse Wizard of Oz-like, into a sprawling cityscape on the debut, the unmasked Phantom of the Opera-style figure awaiting the elevator passengers on Ta-Dah) and see how it is all too reflective of an album that trades their previous senses of wonder and transgression for much cheaper thrills. Rubbery fake funk workouts like “Whole New Way” and “Any Which Way” are both reminiscent of Ta-Dah’s terrific “I Can’t Decide”, but in the place of the older song’s hedonistic joy (see the great double meaning in Shears’ promise to “fuck and kiss you both at the same time”) find instead coy come-ons like “we can talk about relationships but there are better things to fill your head with” or, most embarrassingly, co-vocalist Ana Matronic’s invitation for her lover to ravish her in front of her parents. Previous Scissor Sisters songs were truly thrilling in their sense of pansexual liberation (and, consequently, probably the reason that the band could never hit in America despite considerable European success, and why their homeland gets stuck with a poor excuse for a gay male pop star like Adam Lambert), a disparity that leaves Night Work feeling comparatively neutered.

Thankfully, not all of Night Work feels so second rate. The Ana Matronic-led “Skin This Cat” is an interesting departure, a nearly lo-fi bit of electroclash weirdness that, in its comparatively unpolished minimalism, serves as an acknowledgement of just how much the sounds of disco and funk from the '70s and '80s have had on a new wave of bedroom recording artists who, generations ago, would have recoiled from something so extroverted. Better still is lead single “Fire With Fire”, a panoramic ballad whose spacious Edge-like guitars and subtle synth pulses eventually give way to an epic disco throb. It’s a refreshing moment of sincerity on an album that otherwise appears to be constantly winking, enough so that they even manage to sell the mock orchestral flourishes that usher the song towards its finale. Likewise, the rumbling, atmospheric “Skin Tight”, complete with Cyndi Lauper-like vocal hiccups on the soaring chorus refrain, finds them similarly reaching for a melodic expansiveness and succeeding marvelously.

Sadly, such moments are far less representative of this album’s awkward near-miss than a track like the ponderous “Sex and Violence”, a gloomy allegory that registers as easily the band’s most heavy handed composition since Scissor Sisters closer “Return to Oz”. But where that song’s terse analogy of crystal meth’s ravaging of the gay community felt like the sobering conclusion to the album’s otherwise non-stop high, “Sex and Violence” is just unnecessarily ugly. The ostentatious finale “Invisible Light” is similarly joyless, despite a spoken word cameo from Sir Ian McKellen in full, foreboding Gandalf/Richard III mode. The Scissor Sisters seem to be aiming for what would have been a wholly characteristic “Thriller”/Vincent Price homage, but the song itself is too much of a drone-y drag, with McKellen’s drippy dialogue coming off more like Common’s blathering narration on Kid Cudi’s Man on the Moon: The End of Day rather than evoking Price’s brooding glee. It’s an apt metaphor for the whole of Night Work, actually, a party with the best possible guest list but nobody really having any fun.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.