Evolving Lifeforms: Interview with Plants and Animals' Matthew Woodley

Paul Maher

PopMatters' Paul Maher talks to Plants and Animals own Matthew Woodley about the evolution of the band's sound and their latest release, La La Land.

Plants and Animals

La La Land

US Release: 2010-04-20
Label: Secret City
UK Release: import
Artist Website
Label Website

Hailing from Montreal, Canada, Plants and Animals creates an indefinable brand of music, thick slabs of aural slices coming at ya. Their sound is by turns identifiable and then, without warning, ready to pelt you with nuances of originality. They rely on old school technology, abiding by the surefire techniques of analog to simultaneously transcend and subvert the digital age.

They are wayfarers of the open road, taking their music to over 100 cities so far since their inception in 2008 with their first release, Parc Avenue. They are three: Warren C. Spicer, Matthew ‘the Woodman’ Woodley, and Nicolas Basque, who go all the way, back to their boyhood evolving to the present from an instrumental-based unit to now, masters of pop songs that make their point -- more often than not in under four minutes. Paul Maher spoke to Plants and Animals own Matthew Woodley about the band's latest release, La La Land.

How did Plants and Animals come together?

Warren and I met on the schoolyard when we were 12. We started jamming shortly after that and have been doing it ever since. We met Nic in college. Now there three of us have been playing together for almost a decade.

Have you found the band’s sound or is it still evolving?

Some of both. We've found a sound and turned it into a record twice, all the while still in evolution. I don't think any of us are content saying, "This is our sound, these are the fences, now let's settle down and live within them." La La Land was a definite evolution from Parc Avenue, and I think our next record will be different from the ones before it - borrowing from all we've come to play, but ultimately its own thing. I actually think our third record is going to be the best one we do. Maybe even better than the fourth, but I can't say for sure quite yet.

Define for us post-classic rock and how it fits in with your music?

We played a show a few years ago in our hometown of Montreal and I was joking around with a journalist friend who had said we had a classic rock sound. "Post" just came out, and immediately made sense while being totally ridiculous. I used to be really into the Chicago post-rock sound of the '90s. Now we've built our own post.

Does the acoustic sound of Plants and Animals translate well to the stage in front of a live audience?

We've gotten pretty electric both on record and live, but we always strive for dynamics. Big peaks and valleys. It keeps it interesting.

You've defined your songs as "honest" before linking it to the name of your band. In what ways does that honesty register lyrically, and does it register with your audience?

We put more energy into making our music feel than to be clever. Not that there's anything wrong with clever, but sometimes music can have too much clever and not much music. Not for us, that's all.

How does having MySpace for a web site help you engage directly with your fans?

Everyone knows how to find a band on MySpace, how to get a taste of their sound and their feel, and because of that it's a great way to connect with audiences, people in the business and so on. It's become such a standard that some bands don't even bother with a website.

Are there any drawbacks to it?

Every band on MySpace fits into the MySpace format and sometimes that standardization can be misleading and stripping of character. I've gone and checked out bands on MySpace, assessed their vibe from their background, photo and pithy quote, listened to 10 seconds of their four posted songs, said "meh," and moved on. Then I've gone and seen the same band live and had a totally different experience. We live in quick-click times and all that. It's good to slow down and listen.

Main influences?

Ya gots to know your ABCs: Al Green, Bach and CCR.

Are there any pet peeves Plants & Animals might have about music today?

Lots. But it's more fun to just listen to the good stuff with/avec a cold beer.

TOP 10 ALBUMS that matter to PLANTS & ANIMALS

1. A Love Supreme - John Coltrane

2. Exile on Main Street - Rolling Stones

3. Blue - Joni Mitchell

4. The Goldberg Variations - Bach / Glen Gould

5. Houses of the Holy - Led Zeppelin

6. High Priestess of Soul - Nina Simone

7. Graceland - Paul Simon

8. Voodoo - D'Angelo

9. OK Computer - Radiohead

10. American Water - Silver Jews

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.