Like Touching the Dead: Ken Russell's 'The Devils' (1971)

The Devils is like a trip through Baroque Hell as envisioned by a high end mentor to Kubrick and Jodorowsky. It's all textures and tactile reinterpretations, modernistic designs delivered into the bowels of a beleaguered, belligerent age

The Devils

Director: Ken Russell
Cast: Oliver Reed, Vanessa Redgrave, Dudley Sutton, Max Adrian, Gemma Jones, Christopher Logue
Rated: R
Studio: Warner Brothers
Year: 1971

His status as a forgotten filmmaking giant remains unchanged. For every director he's inspired, for every movie that pays homage to his esoteric eye candy conceits, he's seemingly fallen further out of favor in the discussion of greats. Throughout the '60s and '70s, his reputation as Britain's bad boy of cinema was rivaled only by the amazing movies he helmed, post-modern classics such as Women in Love, The Music Lovers, and his brilliant adaptation of the The Who's Tommy. Today, he's a punchline among all except the most erudite cinephiles. Part of the problem is precedent. Ken Russell today is not the mischievous maverick of forty years ago. Perhaps even more importantly, one of his true masterpieces, 1971's The Devils, remains out of print and out of the conversation.

In actuality, a headstrong Hollywood continues to marginalize Russell's rapier vision of sex and corruption in organized religion, original backing studio Warner Brothers still reluctant to release the uncut version to viable commercial formats (oddly enough, Apple's ITunes offered it for a while a few months back, before mysterious dropping it from availability). Of course, when one actually experiences the shocking, clearly controversial nature of the narrative, it's not hard to see their misguided reluctance. Focusing on madmen, power grabs, faith-based fallacies and the director's always over the top visualization of same, it cemented his standing as an uncompromising, unmatched genius. It also proved to be an artistic albatross, a burden he would have to carry, comment on, and contradict for the rest of his rollercoaster career.

The setting is 17th Century France. A power struggle exists between sitting royal Louis XIII and church despot Cardinal Richelieu. Standing in their way - the town of Loudun and its titular head, the hedonistic priest Urbain Grandier (Oliver Reed). Popular among the people, he is equally adored by the nuns of the local convent. This includes the deranged, deformed Sister Jeanne (Vanessa Redgrave) who is absolutely obsessed with him. When Baron de Laubardemon arrives to destroy the city, Grandier seeks the assistance of the King. In his absence, a spurned Sr. Jeanne accuses him of witchcraft. Enter "professional witch-hunter" Father Pierre Barre (Michael Gothard) who investigates the claims and puts Grandier on trial. Convicted under false pretenses, he is tortured and burned at the stake, while Loudun is finally destroyed.

In the history of harsh criticisms against the mixing of state and faith, in the realm of depictions of true hypocrisy and man's inability to deny his true animalistic nature (for good and bad), The Devils is definitive. It reigns supreme over other films too scared to showcase the true debauchery in all forms of order (religious, royal, and governmental). With his clever combination of assured insight and sheer audacity, Russell redefines the socio-political commentary, moving it miles away from the similarly themed argument and expose, Arthur Miller's The Crucible. Trading on history to provide support and relying on works by Aldous Huxley (who wrote the original book) and John Whiting (who based a play on same) to aide in his quest, the results reverberate in a way that not only deconstructs such narratives, but how they are illustrated as well.

The Devils is like a trip through Baroque Hell as envisioned by a high end mentor to Kubrick and Jodorowsky. It's all textures and tactile reinterpretations, modernistic designs delivered into the bowels of a beleaguered, belligerent age. It's an experience which pulsates and perverts, especially in those glorious moments when Russell slaps the sacred directly in its frescoed face. Be forewarned - this is not some bit of boisterous blasphemy substituting for someone's spiritual quest. This is defamation, libel, and slander all rolled into one. There is no love lost between God, his purported patrons, and this forward-thinking filmmaker. Russell is out to sell religion incredibly short, and he does so majestically.

At its core are two performances worthy of worldwide acclaim and consideration. As he did throughout many of his collaborations with Russell, Oliver Reed steps up to show why he remains one of the UK's most underappreciated actors. Radiating the kind of manic machismo and simmering virility that makes Grandier such a threat, he comes across as brusque, egotistical, conceited, and very vulnerable. Reed may look like the very definition of a "man", but his multilayered turn in The Devils suggests something more complicated and considered. So does the work of Vanessa Redgrave. While some might see her as the stereotypical woman scorned, she's actually the cold, calculating heart of the storyline. Without her fanatical passion, Grandier would probably never stand accused. Without her desire to then play pawn in a callous noble power grab, we'd never have the film's fatalistic end.

But it's Russell who deserves the most credit. Impish in his gleeful garroting of proper convention, his attacks are pointed, prophetic, and purposeful. Naturally, audiences in the early '70s were dumbfounded by the notion of adulterous clergy, sex starved nuns, and amoral officials. Today, it's a laundry list of tabloid/TMZ givens. Of course, few could envision wantonness the way Russell sees it, blood mixing with nude bodies and equally naked emotions to take the concept of a metaphoric fever dream to new degrees of dementia. But there is more to The Devils than the standard "absolute power corrupts absolutely" meshed with flawless imagery. Indeed, Russell wants to explore the dimensions of personal pride, of how people charged with professing good can wind up more wicked and evil than the demons they have vowed to defeat.

Drape it in a scope so sacrilegious it would make the Fallen One himself blush and baste in the typical Russellian excesses and you have a masterpiece masquerading as misunderstood. If Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom can be declared an uncomfortable, corrupt classic, The Devils deserves the same - or more. There is no doubt that Russell intends to do more than feed a fan's prurient interests and the movie makes statements so sharp and erudite that is puts similar sentiments four decades removed to shame. In this brilliant film, nothing is safe: not God, not Satan, not man, not their collective meaning. Of course, when you continually press such hot buttons you're bound to be singled out and stifled. While others reap his deserved rewards, this anarchic auteur remains on the outside, demanding to be let in. Ken Russell and The Devils deserve better.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.