Considering the Slow Burn of 'Final Fantasy XIII'

'Final Fantasy XIII' feels like a slow paced game because it takes its time developing its characters instead of its plot.

Final Fantasy XIII is a slow burn. It takes about four hours for the story to really get going, and then it stalls. At hour three the cast is branded as l’Cie and must run from the government. By hour 24 they’re still running. I didn’t notice this lack of plot progression as I was playing, only when I went back to the game after setting it aside for a month. Only then did I realize how little the plot had changed over all those hours, and I think the reason I didn’t notice that pause in plot is because during that time the characters were being developed instead.

Those first four hours of the game are the most plot heavy simply out of necessity as the story must introduce its central conflict, but even then it takes a whopping four hours to introduce that conflict because the story keeps getting distracted by the characters. We’re introduced to them, their friends, and the relationships that will come to define them over the next several hours. Once the main cast goes on the lam and splits up, the game focuses exclusively on those relationships.

I’ve written before about how splitting up the party helps develop the characters ("Party Division as Character Development in Final Fantasy XIII", PopMatters, 16 July 2010); where they choose to run to and who they choose to run away with says a lot about who they are, and the game takes its time exploring this idea. We jump from group to group as they run, but at no point does the government ever catch up to them, it’s not until hour 20 that two groups meet and finally have a showdown with the police. Every bit of story before that revolves around the characters’ back stories: We learn about Sazh’s relationship with his son, Fang’s surprising connection with Vanille, Vanille’s own troubled past and current countdown to death, Snow’s marriage, Lightning’s relationship with her sister, and finally Hope’s anger over his mother’s death and indifferent relationship with his father. We learn a lot about these people even if nothing is happening around them, and in these moments the game manages to create a sense of forwards momentum because we see a wide range of environments as we jump from group to group. Something as simple as changing scenery creates a false sense of plot progression.

Of course, all this character development is delivered through cut scenes, not gameplay (save for the one moment I wrote about in a previous post: "Combat Mechanics as Character Development in Final Fantasy XIII", PopMatters, 03 September 2010) so Final Fantasy XIII is not exactly a game that takes advantage of its medium. But could a character-driven story be told any other way? Games are about action, not “action” as in car chases and explosions, but “action” as in just doing something. In games we interact with the virtual world, so the story must encourage that interaction. Most games are plot-driven because that means something is always happening to the player and we can react, whereas a character-driven story will naturally demand less interaction from the player. Introspection doesn’t make for good gameplay.

Final Fantasy XIII shows us that games can tell character-driven stories, just not though gameplay alone. We only interact with the world through combat, so cut scenes are necessary for those moments of introspective dialogue. It’s been fascinating to play through levels with no clear objectives; I run forwards because there’s nowhere else to go, but if I had an open world I’d be just as lost as the characters. In that regard it makes sense that the levels are so linear. Cut scenes and linear levels are the easiest way to tell this story, but is there another way? Can a game tell a character-driven story without sacrificing the plot? Can a game tell a character-driven through gameplay alone? Final Fantasy XIII can’t, but at least it tried.

In the wake of Malcolm Young's passing, Jesse Fink, author of The Youngs: The Brothers Who Built AC/DC, offers up his top 10 AC/DC songs, each seasoned with a dash of backstory.

In the wake of Malcolm Young's passing, Jesse Fink, author of The Youngs: The Brothers Who Built AC/DC, offers up his top 10 AC/DC songs, each seasoned with a dash of backstory.

Keep reading... Show less

Pauline Black may be called the Queen of Ska by some, but she insists she's not the only one, as Two-Tone legends the Selecter celebrate another stellar album in a career full of them.

Being commonly hailed as the "Queen" of a genre of music is no mean feat, but for Pauline Black, singer/songwriter of Two-Tone legends the Selecter and universally recognised "Queen of Ska", it is something she seems to take in her stride. "People can call you whatever they like," she tells PopMatters, "so I suppose it's better that they call you something really good!"

Keep reading... Show less

Morrison's prose is so engaging and welcoming that it's easy to miss the irreconcilable ambiguities that are set forth in her prose as ineluctable convictions.

It's a common enough gambit in science fiction. Humans come across a race of aliens that appear to be entirely alike and yet one group of said aliens subordinates the other, visiting violence upon their persons, denigrating them openly and without social or legal consequence, humiliating them at every turn. The humans inquire why certain of the aliens are subjected to such degradation when there are no discernible differences among the entire race of aliens, at least from the human point of view. The aliens then explain that the subordinated group all share some minor trait (say the left nostril is oh-so-slightly larger than the right while the "superior" group all have slightly enlarged right nostrils)—something thatm from the human vantage pointm is utterly ridiculous. This minor difference not only explains but, for the alien understanding, justifies the inequitable treatment, even the enslavement of the subordinate group. And there you have the quandary of Otherness in a nutshell.

Keep reading... Show less

A 1996 classic, Shawn Colvin's album of mature pop is also one of best break-up albums, comparable lyrically and musically to Joni Mitchell's Hejira and Bob Dylan's Blood on the Tracks.

When pop-folksinger Shawn Colvin released A Few Small Repairs in 1996, the music world was ripe for an album of sharp, catchy songs by a female singer-songwriter. Lilith Fair, the tour for women in the music, would gross $16 million in 1997. Colvin would be a main stage artist in all three years of the tour, playing alongside Liz Phair, Suzanne Vega, Sheryl Crow, Sarah McLachlan, Meshell Ndegeocello, Joan Osborne, Lisa Loeb, Erykah Badu, and many others. Strong female artists were not only making great music (when were they not?) but also having bold success. Alanis Morissette's Jagged Little Pill preceded Colvin's fourth recording by just 16 months.

Keep reading... Show less

Frank Miller locates our tragedy and warps it into his own brutal beauty.

In terms of continuity, the so-called promotion of this entry as Miller's “third" in the series is deceptively cryptic. Miller's mid-'80s limited series The Dark Knight Returns (or DKR) is a “Top 5 All-Time" graphic novel, if not easily “Top 3". His intertextual and metatextual themes resonated then as they do now, a reason this source material was “go to" for Christopher Nolan when he resurrected the franchise for Warner Bros. in the mid-00s. The sheer iconicity of DKR posits a seminal work in the artist's canon, which shares company with the likes of Sin City, 300, and an influential run on Daredevil, to name a few.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.