'Paranormal Activity 2': Not a Ghost

PA2 actually isn't that frightening, but it complicates the questions of documentation, memory, and history in ways that make any possible answers at least a little unnerving.

Paranormal Activity 2

Director: Tod Williams
Cast: Sprague Grayden, Molly Ephraim, Brian Boland, Katie Featherston, Vivis, Gabriel Johnson
Rated: R
Studio: Paramount
Year: 2010
US date: 2010-10-22 (General release)
UK date: 2011-10-22 (General release)

"He's kind of smooshy looking." Admiring her newborn infant, Kristi (Sprague Grayden) is at once thrilled and already exhausted, impressed by little Hunter's perfection and a little awed by his utter strangeness. Her husband Daniel (Brian Boland) immediately takes a longer view: he means to document each moment of the child's new life, with the idea that in future, the grown-up Hunter will appreciate seeing not only his crib, his sister's room, and the 50-inch TV where he'll be watching Chargers games with dad, but also the fireplace "where mommy seduced daddy."

Daniel's recording sets in motion the home-video premise of Paranormal Activity 2. Like Orin Peli's first film, this second one (a prequel directed by Tod Williams and produced by Peli) considers how recording shapes experience. This time, the conceit is less convincing as plot but more compelling as theme. The plot problem has to do with who shoots what: Daniel and his teenaged daughter Ali (Molly Ephraim) take turns with the handheld camera, their motivations variously unexplained. He apparently loses interest early in the film, partly because he's gone at work or somewhere, and partly because he doesn't see the recording as the means to understand the spooky goings-on (in fact, he tends to dismiss his wife's fears of same). Ali is more explicitly interested in capturing the "phenomenon," but she's also prone to use the camera for her video diary, fretting about the chaos in ways that are alternately stereotypically adolescent and too expository.

The bulk of the action is rendered via security cameras that Daniel installs throughout his home, following an ostensible "break-in," a year after Hunter's birth (furniture is overturned, books and papers tossed, drawers emptied, but "nothing's taken"). These cameras provide a multi-angle version of the single-camera, single room effort undertaken by Micah (Micah Stote) in Paranormal Activity (which was famously made for a reported $15,000). And the cutting from one night-visioned image to another invites viewers to anticipate noise or movement in six locations rather than one. That these are all set in ceiling corners also makes for some precipitous views of shadows and doors, rather inherently creepy.

Such creepiness is provided a context right off the bat, as the new movie is set "60 days before the death of Micah Stote." So, when he shows up here, visiting with his wife and Kristi's sister Katie (Katie Featherston), he's already something like a ghost in your mind. This raises the specter (so to speak) of PA2's thematic interests in recording and memory and time. On one level, these are intertwined much as in the first film: you watch a lot of footage (or so it begins to feel), where rooms are still, individuals are sleeping, or, in this case, the German shepherd Abby is looking as worried and alert as the huskies in John Carpenter's The Thing.

On another level, as the second film is set before the first, it includes allusions to what you know will happen in three months: because you know pretty exactly how Micah and Katie's story goes (at les as far as their limited camera views allow), you experience extra vexations over the similar disruptions and noisy incursions suffered by Kristi and Ali, especially, again, since Daniel tends to tune out or otherwise not attend to his wife and daughter. Unlike Micah, Daniel resists sorting through the footage his own high tech and expensive surveillance system accumulates (and yes, his willful ignorance produces the expected bad end, and he's easily the film's weakest, least convincing character). When Ali or Kristi try to show him something they've seen on the tape, he dismisses their interpretations, implacably claiming rational explanations ("the wind," an electrical glitch, a malfunctioning swimming pool vacuum).

Daniel also resists help from Martine (Vivis), Hunter's nanny, whose attempts to protect the house from the malvado, with candles and smoke and incantations, leads to her firing. Both a stereotypically mysterious Latina and the only individual in the film to identify the trouble immediately, Martine also embodies most vividly the impossibility of dealing with it. Her remedies are traditional (and predictably dismissed by Daniel as well as perceived as comedy by the film's viewers), but her understanding is transcendent, or at least, correct. She knows it's a spirit and not a ghost. And she doesn't need to Google "demons" to appreciate the danger.

Martine also helps PA2 to lay out the insufficiencies of recording, the ways that documenting does not provide order or control. Rather, as she relies on what she cannot see -- the surveillance cameras catch her performing her smoky ritual into the air that otherwise shows no disturbance -- but can only intuit, Martine becomes the hero the white folks can neither acknowledge nor exploit.

When she first meets Hunter, Martine calls him "especial." Kristi imagines what she will, that the boy is special because he's hers or because he's adorable or smooshy looking. She can't foresee that he's also special because of his place in her family's story. Like Katy before her (or after her, depending on how you're reading the films' order), Kristi misses cues until it's too late, but also has a lurking memory of a haunted childhood. When Katy tells her she needs not to talk about it, to repress the past, and Kristi takes the advice to heart, the sisters unwittingly seal their fates. You recognize this immediately, because you know the slightly more elaborate story that Katy uncovers in Paranormal Activity.

In this and other instances, the two films are working together in ways that are far more interesting than most originals-and-sequels' repetitions or bigger-and-louder sequences. PA2 actually isn't that frightening -- it relies on hectic framing and loud noises to bother you in the end -- but it complicates the questions of documentation, memory, and history in ways that make any possible answers at least a little unnerving.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.