Bujold’s Miles Vokosigan Novels Exemplify Why I Prefer Science in My Fiction

The settings may seem improbable, but I often fine science-fiction protagonists to be the most believable.

I read just about every genre, except I guess romance novels, and my reading is split about even between fiction and non-fiction. For me, fiction is more about the escape and getting lost in the story than it is about literary flares or particularly stunning prose. Those things are great and all, but I’m first and foremost a story guy. Sometimes they go together, like in one of my favorite novels this year, The Thousand Autumns of Jacob DeZoet, but it’s rare to find an author who sparkles with both plot and prose-style. As long as the writing’s solid, I’ll choose the latter over the former nine times out of ten.

As a result, I usually end up reading a lot of science fiction. It’s not that science fiction has some sort of monopoly on good plots (it doesn’t), but rather that it seems to have an distinct advantage when it comes to having plots where character’s make smart decisions. Neal Stephenson discussed how sci-fi tends to have more intelligent-acting characters in a talk he gave at Gresham College a couple years back. He used the example of Aliens, where the heroes decide on the plan, “escape this death trap and nuke the planet from orbit,” and the plot evolves from there, with characters making the smart decisions most of the time, but still having to overcome plenty of obstacles and monsters. The opposite kind of fiction (Stephenson uses slasher movies as a counter example) often relies on characters make dumb decisions whose only virtue is that they drive the plot forward rather than do anything we would do in similar circumstances.

Of course there are counter-examples and sci-fi isn’t alone in having smart characters doing the logical thing, but sci-fi might be unique in that it emphasizes this kind of behavior. When you’ve got settings full of inherent challenges like aliens and other worlds, there’s plenty of material to drive the plot forward with having to have your characters act like idiots. In truth, a lot of science-fiction really is just other genres re-packaged in space or the future in order to set the stage as the author sees fit rather than conforming to the world we all know and live in. But even when they’re just variations on mysteries or war stories or political thrillers or whatever else, I find that most science-fiction keeps this inner core of logical characters doing smart things as part of their story-telling DNA.

Lois McMaster Bujold’s excellent Miles Vorkosigan series exemplifies everything I’m talking about here. I just finished the newest book, Cryoburn on audio book. As an aside, I have to heap praise upon Grover Gardener’s excellent reading of the entire series. He brings Miles and the rest of Bujold’s characters to life and has a great ear for her prose. The books are really engaging on their own, but when read by Gardner, they become very nearly perfect entertainments. I’ve listened to them all, some more than once. As I listened along, I kept being surprised over and over again by the twists the story took. Not just because they were surprising, but because they were surprisingly logical. Time and again, the characters do exactly what you think they should: they call for help, they go to the police, they make sure the tracking beacon is de-activated first. And when they don’t do what you think the smart thing would be, it’s usually because they’re doing something even smarter. Either that or they’re doing something you think is dumb but which fits perfectly with their own character’s view of the world.

It’s an actually refreshing experience to read a story like that. Like all the Vorkosigan books, there are reversals and challenges aplenty for Miles to overcome, and some surprises as well. As a rule, these plot points all stem from the antagonists behaving with as much logic as the heroes. No not everyone in these books is always smart, but when they’re not, they are believably stupid, which is just as good. And while science-fiction elements play a big role in all the plots (in this case, the social impact of a whole planet devoted to cryogenically freezing their sick), the stories themselves center around politics, crime, emotions, and people that would be at home in novels of any genre. The author’s voice (and the narrator’s) are present throughout, but her hand very seldom shows itself. Gripping tales unfold around intriguing, empathetic characters and result in satisfying climaxes. What more can one ask from a novel than that?

But don’t take my word for it. The first of Vorkosigan books, Warrior’s Apprentice is available as a free download, leaving you almost no excuse not to give them a try. Although really, if you have an Audible account or some other audiobook preference, the Gardner-read versions are as good as it gets. Find the free book right here under Lois McMaster Bujold.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.