‘First Wave’s’ Pulp and Noir World: The Failure Between Concept and Execution

Michael D. Stewart
First Flight: Writer Brian Azzarello attempts to marry together DC's past as pulp fiction publisher with its present as superhero publisher.

It seems at once so seductive and authentic, the idea of DC returning to its pulp roots (as so many companies recently have) with First Wave. But far from bridging the pulp era to the superhero, First Wave falls short because of its strengths.

Comics: First Wave #5
Publisher: DC
Length: 22 pages
Writer: Brian Azzarrello
Price: $3.99
Publication Date: January 2011

Among comic publishers, pulp and noir stories are all the rage. From Marvel’s “Noir” line and its imprint Icon’s Incognito to DC’s revival of “Doc Savage” and “The Spirit,” gritty adventure yarns have never been so much in vogue since their boom years. It’s as much a testament to the evolution of comics since the 1980s as it is a reflection on the dominate elements of pop culture. What’s old is new again.

DC further jumps into this trend with its First Wave series. Like Marvel’s “Noir” line, First Wave takes existing characters and thrusts them into a re-imagined pulp world. DC sets itself apart in this area by using actual pulp characters from its library as a foundation. It’s as much a tribute as it is a renaissance. The capes and cowls of the last 60 years owe much of their existence to the pulp magazines of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. The old magazines presented men without special abilities fighting street crime, gangsters, mad scientists and men seeking world domination. While Superman was a complete divergence from the genre, Batman was an evolution of that type of protagonist. His early adventures utilized a similar tone and many of the common plot devices found in noir and pulp stories. Including him in First Wave is a bridging element that provides a link from the old world to the current.

First Wave is an interesting concept that was first presented in a “Doc Savage/Batman” special one-shot in November 2009. Developed by notorious noir writer Brian Azzarello (“100 Bullets”) as a reimagining of part of the DC Universe as a pulp inspired world, the concept seemed like a dream come true. All of the characters – mainly Doc Savage, Batman and The Spirit – are firmly rooted in the noir and pulp traditions, lending themselves easily to a gritty serial.

The “Doc Savage/Batman” special, while light on plot, demonstrated how intriguing a pulp inspired world could be under the direction of a modern creative team. The back of the book material, presenting Azzarello’s treatment for the series, further cemented the potential. It laid out a traditional pulp world that was also refreshing and energized. But between that one-shot and the five First Wave issues released (not including the other spinoffs) the translation from treatment to published books has hampered the concept.

The plot of First Wave is fairly straight forward. Anton Colossi and his other compatriots of the “Golden Tree” are trying to control the future of the world by becoming the dominate players in it. They’ve amassed a floating city and a secret cabal to accomplish their dream. The Batman, Doc Savage and The Spirit have all come together under their own motivations to put a stop to it.

Fans of Azzarello’s “100 Bullets” series will recognize the narrative devices and subtlety that have made him a fan favorite. He’s definitely an expert on what makes a noir story. His pulp credentials may be a little light, but his strengths in long-form storytelling should more than make up for it. With First Wave he’s playing with the whole of pulp history, which includes jungle adventure stories, mad scientists and robots. Some of the common pulp elements that are tied into the narrative flow of this series.

To say that First Wave is a series of wasted potential is a fair assessment. The plot is an unyielding and confusing mess that is barely contained within the pages of the issues. Pulp and noir stories lend themselves to serialized storytelling, but a plot that overreaches exposes a soft underbelly of too much in too little. “First Wave’s” plot certainly does overreach and lacks focus, but in fairness it’s not the most disappointing element. The most disappointing, as stated prior, is that the treatment for the series was so strong, encompassing a depth and breadth from a creator honed into to its tone and spirit (pardon the pun), but the resulting product is a shadow (apologies for the pun again) of that potential.

Further troubling are the artists rounding out the creative team. Penciller Rags Morales has done some fine work, particularly with DC’s “Identity Crisis” limited series, but here his style disconnects from the narrative. You would think that the kinetic movement of an adventure yarn would play to his strengths with movement? That sadly is not the result.

The color and ink work from Rick Bryant and Nei Ruffino does little to help Morales cause. The colors try too hard to be nuanced in their effects that they wind up simplifying Morales’s line work. The inking is so heavy handed that pages and panels have a thick quality that is far from complimentary to “First Wave’s” narrative structure. This is not to say that the artwork is that bad. It’s a level below workable mainly because it lacks connection to the genre. With another script, inspired by another style, it would be far more successful.

The resurgence of pulp and noir stories has been a mixed bag: Marvel’s “Noir” line was hit or miss; “Incognito” through one volume and the beginning of the second has been excellent; First Wave has not been a failure, but it has not by any means been a success. Thinking back to November 2009, it’s hard to believe that a series with such potential and scope would be so underwhelming. This is not a reflection of the genre itself. The viability of noir and pulp stories in the modern era is quite strong. The cultural elements that made them popular 60 years ago are present today. War, economic turbulence, political polarization and the subtle destruction of our naiveté through searing cultural events have all played a part in our collective decent into a darker time. However post-modern and ironic it may be, pulp and noir adventures are a part of our contemporary comics. They were there from the beginning, and like the saying goes: what’s old is new again.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.