G(OMG)lden Gl(OMG)bes: Thoughts on the 2011 Nominations

The 2011 Golden Globe Nominations have been announced and with them comes another bout of jaw dropping at the expense of The Hollywood Foreign Press Corps.

Irrelevancy arrives in many forms. For members of the Hollywood Foreign Press, it comes in cloud of unfettered glitz and pointless espionage glamour. Say what you will about this forever pointless journalistic community, but they can sure shoot themselves in the significance shoe when they want to. With past atrocities like Pia Zadora/Best New Performer a generation or two behind us, the Oscar wannabes continue to dream up ways to contravene their already questionable worth. For many, winning a Golden Globe is still important. It represents the embrace of the international community, a fiscal necessity outside the insular walls of Tinseltown. But looking over the choices made for 2011, once has to wonder if the organization has simply lost their mind.

It's not merely a question of being out of step. No, for the longest time, the members of this elusive clique have danced to the din of their own particularly perplexed drummer, and the beat has been off kilter and confusing most of the time. They rarely, if ever, predict Academy glory, and can often be seen as catering to a community that rewards its 'own' ala the original cabal-like Oscars of the '30s. So the consistent crappiness of their Winter celebration is not without precedent. How they've managed to stay viable in a world wising up to their worthlessness is a subject for another investigative day. For now, it's time to fret over and fume at the potential winners come this16 January. Maybe this battle for import is the reason why we care. It certainly can't be for choices like:

Best Picture - Drama


Black Swan

The Fighter


The King's Speech

The Social Network

While there are no major surprises here - with perhaps the possible exception of a complete lack of True Grit - the most interesting aspect of the Best Picture race rests within the battle brewing between critic's groups and so-called informed film pundits. For weeks, many have stated that The Social Network has little chance at Oscar gold. Yet many Year-End list and voting collectives have it right near, or at, the top. If you believe the writers, it's an all Facebook finish. But there are more than a few insiders who think differently, so the Globes may be an important bellwether.

Best Motion Picture - Musical or Comedy


Alice in Wonderland


The Kids are Alright


The Tourist

Hello Golden Globes - let's introduce you to widespread and embarrassed scrutiny one more time. It's a shame when the most worthy movie on this list is a commercial stunt from several months ago. Tim Burton's reimagined Alice might win voters over, but what on Earth was this group thinking when they lauded the undeniably lame Burlesque and absolutely horrid Tourist for Best-of consideration? It makes no sense, and when you consider the films overlooked, it argues for some manner of conspiracy. Really? Burlesque???

Best Actor in a Motion Picture - Drama


Jesse Eisenberg, The Social Network

Colin Firth, The King's Speech

James Franco, 127 Hours

Ryan Gosling, Blue Valentine

Mark Wahlberg, The Fighter

In this category, Wahlberg is the outsider looking in - and not particularly enjoying the view. Firth is the presumptive favorite, his performance the kind of terrific tour de force that wins over the old guard's grumpy heart. The rest will have to be happy for the nomination alone.

Best Actress in a Motion Picture - Drama


Halle Berry, Frankie and Alice

Nicole Kidman, The Rabbit Hole

Jennifer Lawrence, Winter's Bone

Natalie Portman, Black Swan

Michelle Williams, Blue Valentine

This is more or less a two woman race - Kidman vs. Portman. Few have seen Berry's multiple personality pic, and Lawrence's excellent work suffers from the same limited exposure. Williams will get the Weinstein push, but it might not be enough to overcome the already building consensus on Black Swan's tragic ballerina. Kidman could sneak in - she's very good in Rabbit Hole - but Portman's win already looks like a done deal.

Best Actor in a Motion Picture - Musical or Comedy


Johnny Depp, Alice in Wonderland

Johnny Depp, The Tourist

Paul Giamatti, Barney's Version

Jake Gyllenhaal, Love and Other Drugs

Kevin Spacey, Casino Jack

In a category that shouldn't even exist - none of the performances here match the work to be found in the Drama group - we will pick Depp, if only because of his multiple nods. Oddly enough, his turn in The Tourist was the only good thing about that fiasco. As for the rest, you're guess is as good as the half-assed nominations themselves.

Best Actress in a Motion Picture - Musical or Comedy


Annette Bening, The Kids Are Alright

Anne Hathaway, Love and Other Drugs

Angelina Jolie, The Tourist

Emma Stone, Easy A

Julianne Moore, The Kids Are Alright

Yeah for Emma Stone! She's been a star in the waiting for long enough. But she really doesn't stand a chance against the pro-PC positioning of Moore and Bening as committed (?) lesbians struggling to keep their marriage together. Jolie's acknowledgement is laughable at best (if her efforts in The Tourist were good enough, why not Salt?) and as for Hathaway, she appears to be nothing more than pretty press gauntlet fodder, nothing more or less.

Best Supporting Actress


Amy Adams, The Fighter

Helena Bonham Carter, The King's Speech

Mila Kunis, Black Swan

Melissa Leo, The Fighter

Jacki Weaver, Animal Kingdom

An interesting group of women, all of whom gave great performances this year. If based on screen time alone, Kunis is the amiable afterthought. Similarly, Leo and Adams will negate each other, their work in The Fighter adding depth to an already dense story. While it might looks like Bonham Carter's year, don't be surprised is Ms. Weaver walks away with it. She's been a critic's darling ever since the excellent Australian crime thriller hit theaters over the summer.

Best Supporting Actor


Christian Bale, The Fighter

Michael Douglas, Wall Street 2

Andrew Garfield, The Social Network

Jeremy Renner, The Town

Geoffrey Rush, The King's Speech

Get Michael Douglas' cancer-scare career-overview recognition out of here. He's recovering, and he's done better work. Similarly, Andrew Garfield is good, but not great, as one of many scorned by the power struggles of one Mark Zuckerberg. While Renner is also terrific, he's not crucial to The Town's success. That just leaves Rush and Bale - and it all depends if the voters are swayed by Bostonian addict bravado or sheepish Australian polish. Either in the winner's circle would be acceptable.

Best Director


Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan

David Fincher, The Social Network

Tom Hooper, The King's Speech

Christopher Nolan, Inception

David O. Russell, The Fighter

Now we get to the difficult bit. How great would it be if Aronofsky, or Fincher, or Nolan won. Each has so much geek cred going for him that a statue would really rock Messageboard Nation. Russell has too much YouTube baggage to be a serious contender, but his film is definitely worth considering. That just leave UK TV ace Hooper to play spoiler. While Speech is not as strong cinematically as the other entries in this category, it does have the kind of prepackaged patina that makes Awards voters swoon.

Best Screenplay


Danny Boyle & Simon Beaufoy, 127 Hours

Lisa Cholodenko, The Kids are Alright

Christopher Nolan, Inception

David Sieber, The King's Speech

Aaron Sorkin, The Social Network

Sorkin has this sewn up. Nolan could give him a run, but for the most part, The Social Network's script has been a point of praise since the film first screened.

Best Animated Feature


Despicable Me

How to Train Your Dragon

The Illusionist


Toy Story 3

This could be interesting. While Pixar usually has this category firmly wrapped up, Dragon has been coming on strong as of late. Some are even predicting an Illusionist win, the thinking being that all the Hollywood hits will cancel each other out and lead to a left field selection walking away from the prize. Our guess? Don't count out the House of Mouse -or its subsidiaries - quite yet.

Best Foreign Language Film



The Concert

The Edge

I Am Love

In a Better World

Either the other four films in this category are so amazing that they match perfectly with the latest from Babel/21 Grams guide Alejandro González Iñárritu, or the Hollywood Foreign Press really want Biutiful to win. As a full time critic, I can proudly say I have only heard of one other title here - and the Tilda Swinton vehicle is good, but not grand. It's a shame there was no room for Dogtooth, or Mother, or Micmacs in this mix.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.