Sneak Peek at 'The Book of Mormon'

South Park creators and societal scab-pickers Trey Parker and Matt Stone are fascinated by Mormonism. A few weeks before official previews were set to begin, the creators of The Book of Mormon opened the doors to their rehearsal space and gave writers a sneak peek. Here's what we saw.

It could have been a disaster. I was thinking it might be as I made the transfer from the G train to the E on my way into Manhattan from Brooklyn. “The guys from South Park are making a musical about the Mormon church? This is bound to be a train wreck.” But on my way to the show’s rehearsal space, I passed the Foxwoods Theatre, home of Spider-Man: Turn off the Dark, and everything was put into perspective.

The Book of Mormon (subtitled “God’s Favorite Musical”) is scheduled to open at the Eugene O’Neill Theatre on March 24, a month after previews began. A few weeks ago, a large group of entertainment writers were given an opportunity to see a stripped down rehearsal comprising roughly the first 20 minutes of the show, which featured book, music and lyrics by South Park creators and societal scab-pickers Trey Parker and Matt Stone, along with Robert Lopez, co-creator of Tony Award-winning musical Avenue Q. Much of the hype has centered on what layers of sacrilege and offense the partnership might produce, and based upon the brief preview, the quick answer is probably quite a lot.

But to dismiss the show as nothing more than another chapter in what has been a long history of provocative shit-stirring by Parker and Stone would be a mistake. Based on the first few numbers, The Book of Mormon is certainly that, but it’s also lively, hilarious, toe-tapping fun. And, dare I say it, it’s also reverential to its subject matter.

It’s entirely possible the trio came into the press conference knowing they’d need to play nice so as to avoid being added to the hit list of yet another large group of potentially organized and potentially even more angry people. And if that’s what they did, primarily attempt to deflect fury, they did so with a seemingly genuine balance of awe and awesome.

“In terms of Mormonism, we are all fascinated by it,” noted Parker, the admitted instigator of the whole affair. “We didn’t come into this to bash Mormonism; I’ve liked every Mormon I’ve ever met.”

To that end, Parker said they weren’t overly concerned about the consequences of upsetting the LDS, even those who don’t necessarily approach the musical with a sense of humor.

“Mormons are so nice,” he said. “We’re not as worried about them as other people.”

Stone praised the Mormon Church as being a wholly American religion, while Lopez was a bit more direct.

“It rekindles your faith in the miracle that all these people believe in this shit,” he said.

On its surface, The Book of Mormon is sort of like The Odd Couple, only the fastidious stiff and irascible shlub are young elders paired together on a missionary assignment, not to an oversized Manhattan apartment, but rather to Uganda.

“It’s a coming of age story,” said Stone. “The challenge was telling the story honestly.”

Parker agreed.

“It all comes down to the characters and what they’re doing,” he said.

The primary elders are played by Andrew Rannells, who has done plenty of voice and stage work; and Josh Gad, who has carved out a niche in the goofy best pal role in films like Love and Other Drugs. The pair work well together, and the rest of the cast is also dynamite, from Jesus on down to the elders. When the setting shifts to Uganda, the cast is every bit as strong, especially Michael Potts as Mafala Hatimbi, quite a divergence from his turn as Brother Mouzone on HBO’s The Wire.

Where it all leads after the elders arrive in Uganda remains to be seen, as that’s where the sneak peek ended.

“You’ll know it’s done when you hear the word ‘cunt’ and everyone bows,” Stone said, and he wasn’t kidding; the last song heard in the rehearsal hall featured a torrent of catchy blasphemy, the likes of which anyone hoping the show will be a smash should be more than thrilled with.

For ticket information, visit:

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.