Referencing the Bulldozer: An Interview with Akron/Family

Sara Hayes
Photo: Ian McNeil

Mysterious album sessions near a volcano? Multiple copies of the same disc leaked online? Citing bulldozers for inspiration? The latest Akron/Family album is the band's most daring yet, and Miles Seaton sits down with PopMatters to set things straight (somewhat).


S/T II: The Cosmic Birth and Journey of Shinju TNT

Label: Dead Oceans
US Release Date: 2011-02-08
UK Release Date: 2011-01-17
Artist website

Akron/Family is a band that has constantly forged their own path -- not only in the way that they have navigated the course of their career, but also in the way that they approach both recording their music and performing it. With each successive release, the band builds upon the foundation they’ve created and continue to push their sonic boundaries, all while remaining very true to themselves. One of Akron/Family’s greatest strengths is that their sound is uniquely theirs.

According to the press release for Akron/Family II: The Cosmic Birth and Journey of Shinju TNT, the band’s sixth full-length album, its origins are shrouded in mystery: the disc was written in a volcanic national park on an island in Japan and then recorded in an abandoned train station in Detroit with producer Chris Koltay (who also worked with the band on their last album, 2009’s Set Em’ Wild, Set Em’ Free). A quote from the text that especially resonates is that the album was created as "a great flourishing of friendships and joint creativity and hard work, brought about by the still stubborn belief in a vision creative and encouraging." Bassist/multi-instrumentalist Miles Seaton says that the album definitely contains "references to our own music and to ourselves and our musical and artistic personalities."

In listening to the new disc, there are some noticeable differences between this and the last album. Akron/Family II opens up new doors -- finding joy in distortion, fuzz, and noise and forming them into songs that are often mesmerizing in their scope and enthusiasm. Oftentimes, the vocals are buried underneath the mix. This is a definite shift, Seaton admits: “We came up in the Michael Gira school of production and [in that] the vocals are very upfront -- far and away almost too loud by contemporary rock standards.”

In contrast to that, vocals do not take precedence here -- they float and weave amongst the melodies. There was also a conscious decision by the band to make the album’s sound something that needs to be taken in as a whole. The flow of the album is such that the songs act as vignettes -- captured moments in sound and feeling. Taken out of the context of the whole, they are still valid, but when the album is played start to finish, the listener gets a better understanding of what the band was trying to accomplish.

Seaton explained, “When you look at light, you sense all the different colors in the spectrum even though you don’t actually see them. We tried to actually treat the recording like that.” Moving away from some of the darker sounds found in previous recordings, the band strove to incorporate that feeling of light amongst the haze of distortion -- creating something that was “inspired and joyful and colorful and radiated positive energy and clarity,” Seaton says.

Inspiration for Akron/Family II came from a variety of sources, since Seaton and his bandmates Dana Janssen and Seth Olinsky often have widely divergent musical tastes. However, they were definitely influenced by time that the band spent touring in Japan and the bands that they played with along the way, as they tended to be more acid punk and crazy noise in their sound. “When we started dreaming about what this record was going to look like,” Seaton says, “It was this wild, feral, insane, super noisy, over-the-top thing in a lot of ways.”

All three also had a pretty “radical, revelatory kind of experience” watching a set by Boredoms at the All Tomorrow’s Parties festival in 2009. Boredoms ended up serving as a visual inspiration for the band, as well. When envisioning the record, they found themselves drawn to a series of photos involving the founder of the band, Eye, performing under the name Hanatarash in the 1980s. Seaton explains, “He did this one performance where he drove a bulldozer through the side of a wall and into the venue.” As the photos documenting the event unfold, there are scenes of the bulldozer lurching forward with Eye perched on the back, Eye falling out of the bulldozer appearingly mangled, and just showing a “total and utter commitment and presence -- just obliterating the fear,” Seaton relates. Those photos and that attitude were a guiding light for the band throughout the recording process. “Anytime that we felt like we were just, you know, settling into the get-it-done mediocrity ... looking at the bulldozer -- that’s the ideal -- putting ourselves on the line like that, and I think that the record has that extreme quality.”

And what about the multiple versions of the album that were rumored [and found] to appear on the internet before the album was actually released? Well, “No comment,” Seaton laughingly says.

He did admit that it is increasingly difficult for a band that wants to make a broad artistic statement to do so in today’s culture. Take a second to think about it: we all know this to be true. In this modern age of quick consumption, listeners tend to be hyper-aware and almost overwhelmed by the sheer amount of music at our fingertips. It’s no secret that broad statements are challenging in the age of information, especially when our collective attention spans tend to be on the shorter side. This challenges the band to constantly “think about ways to bring the magic and the poetry and the love and the intentionality back into music and art.” Keeping it special is important, as it should be something to be savored and enjoyed. Seaton, Janssen and Olinsky constantly strive for different ways to explore the context of the art of creating an album -- sometimes looking out at artists like Banksy and the “art-prank” world, for example, to figure out how their work can be part of that broader expression. “In some ways, the whole idea of potentially creating a mystery or a weird thing is creating a little bit of a world that people can kinda enter into,” Seaton says.

Akron/Family is about to head out on a tour to support the new album, and will perform primarily as a three-piece. The band’s live shows are a wonder to behold -- noisy, joyful, and intense. After founding member Ryan Vanderhoof left the band after the completion of 2007’s Love Is Simple, their live performances began to change in response. Subsequent tours with bands such as Megafaun, Greg Davis, and The Dodos -- who often joined the band for their set -- caused the band to take a look at themselves and the way that they were connecting with their music. Those tours were “a response to us trying to re-examine and re-animate some of our musical ideas and explore them in a different way after we had been touring as a four piece for so long,” states Seaton. Touring with friends made it easier for the remaining members to figure out how they wanted to present their songs and on a larger level, proceed creatively. It ended up being an artistically viable experience for the band, and it is one that they are open to experimenting with again in the future. Seaton says, “It helped us understand our strengths and the ways that we could really perform as a three piece.”

There’s a special group of musicians out there. They are endlessly passionate for their craft -- unafraid to take chances, try new things, and with each release, create something that has its own particular brand of magic. With Akron/Family II: The Cosmic Birth and Journey of Shinju TNT, the band has taken another step forward. One can’t help but feel their excitement as they take listeners along with them for the ride.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.