Mike Watt and the Missingmen: Hyphenated-Man

Mike Watt and Hieronymus Bosch revisit the Minutemen sound, with strange and wonderful results.

Mike Watt and the Missingmen


Label: Clenchedwrench
US Release Date: 2011-03-01
UK Release Date: 2011-03-01

Here's the short version: punk-rock bass god Mike Watt has returned. His new album, Hyphenated-Man, features 30 songs, only two of which are longer than two minutes. He recorded it with his power trio, the Missingmen, so it sounds more like the Minutemen than anything he's done since 1985. Watt has drawn inspiration from Hieronymus Bosch's 15th-century triptych, The Garden of Earthly Delights. Each song represents, and is named after, one of the fantastic allegorical critters scurrying around the painting. If this doesn't already sound cool, you might as well stop reading.

Still here? Great. As it was with the Minutemen, it's incredible the range of styles and emotions Watt can convey with the most stringent constraints on his music. Repetition is kept to the bare minimum, so that you're only beginning to realize that you've heard this section before when the song veers off into new territory. As such, we can cycle through a whole verse-chorus-verse-chorus-coda structure in a minute and a half. Tonally, Watt keeps it similarly efficient -- the drumming is kinetic, funky, and textural, the guitar is spare and scratchy, and Watt's bass playing is melodic and ferocious. With these basic elements, however, Watt and the Missingmen are able to conjure up styles and moods as diverse as the playful, loping "Mouse-Headed-Man"; the tense and angry "Man-Shitting-Man"; the soaring, triumphant riffs of "Hammering-Castle-Bird-Man"; the skittish, pointillistic "Head-and-Feet-Only-Man"; or the oddly anthemic "Own-Horn-Blowing-Man".

In a fascinating piece in the New York Times recently, Watt discussed his creative process for this record. An individual figure in Bosch's painting would imply a particular emotion or personality trait, which Watt would then apply to himself, along with references to other phenomena associated with that emotion. A picture of a man blowing on a trumpet with a flute lodged in his rear, for example, reminded Watt of throwing a tantrum, which in turn evoked the infamous Buddy Rich tapes (recordings of the great jazz drummer and bandleader screaming at his band after shows for perceived shortcomings, both personal and professional -- a big hit on the bootleg circuit, apparently). The result is the song "Blowing-It-Out-Both-Ends-Man", a frantic distillation of a fit of rage.

When Watt pares things down as brutally as he does, though, a lot of the process becomes invisible. In "Blowing-It-Out-Both-Ends-Man", the only reference to the Buddy Rich tapes that makes it through Watt's artistic filter is the surreal closing rejoinder, "…and no beards!" Without annotated guides to each song, it is difficult for the uninitiated listener to figure out what the hell is going on. I've spent as much time poring over Watt's music as anyone, and I couldn't tell you what personal epiphany or outside references lie in "Mouse-Headed-Man", the complete lyrics of which are as follows:

Like a mouse Like a mouse Like a mouse And the mouse sings Like a mouse Like a mouse Like a mouse

In short, this record will, by its very nature, keep most of its audience at arm's length.

Like other epic albums comprised of lots of short songs, Hyphenated-Man can be pretty daunting. No matter how much invention goes into the composition and sequencing, it takes several listens for the last third of the record to sink in (who here can name their favorite song off side four of Double Nickels on the Dime?). All of this makes it tricky to assign a numerical grade. I love this record, but cannot in good conscience recommend it to everyone. In writing about his own relationship with art, Mike Watt has produced a record as idiosyncratic and personal as anyone's reaction to a given song or record. It's impossible not to muster up a great deal of admiration for such an accomplishment, even if the record itself isn't the easiest thing to love. It's a complex, challenging album that does not meet its listeners halfway; if you're up for spending some time in Watt's world, though, there's really nothing else like it.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.