A Good Menu Sets the Mood Redux: Three More Memorable Menus

There are three semi-recent games that I feel deserve special mention for their creative use of the normally bland main menu.

A good menu can set the tone for the rest of the game to come, or when done poorly, it can be a nuisance that players try to skip as fast as possible every time that they boot up a game. Since the last time I wrote about some innovative menus, three more games have come out that I feel deserve special mention for how handle this normally bland part of a game.

Metro 2033

Metro 2033 has a main menu that looks like its part of the world itself, and through a close attention to detail, it manages to be effective as a menu while reinforcing the aesthetic of the game.

After hitting the start button to pass the title screen, the camera cuts to a desk, mimicking a first-person perspective, as if you were sitting in the chair. On the desk are various items like a radio, typewriter, television (cathode ray tube), and a map; each one represents a typical menu option. When scrolling through the options, they’re highlighted by movement and by lights in the environment around them. The radio and television turn on and fill the air with static, the map is brought closer to the camera, and a lamp turns on over the typewriter. These actions effectively tell the player which option is selected without ever feeling unreal. Everything that you see in the menu is something you’ll also see in the world itself. There’s no need for a glowing outline around each item that would bring attention to the menu’s “gamey-ness.”

The economic use of space on the desk reflects the aesthetic of the metro stations. Everything is cramped together on this small desktop, just as people are cramped together in the metros. Even the music feels natural: A quiet, haunting tune played on a single guitar. It sounds like something that you’d hear in a post-apocalyptic metro tunnel, and in fact, you walk past someone playing a similar song early in the game. Every part of the menu feels like it belongs in this fictional world, and it still manages to be an effective menu.

Call of Duty: Black Ops

While I found the game itself to be lacking in creativity, the main menu of Black Ops is an inspiration. As soon as the publisher and developer logos end, you’re thrown into the body of protagonist Alex Mason, who is strapped to a chair in a grimy looking laboratory, surrounded by televisions. One of those televisions happens to have a list of options on it like Campaign, Multiplayer, Zombies, and Options. You have full control over Alex’s head, so you’re able to look around, as if you were already playing the game, but since he’s strapped to the chair you can’t actually move. The left analog stick normally used for movement is instead used to navigate the menu on the television.

This menu immerses you in the game more effectively than Metro 2033 because your current situation is plot related. When the Campaign option is selected, a voice starts asking Alex about “the numbers” while you’re still in the chair. There’s no fade to black before a cut scene begins because the opening menu is part of an important location in the game world--where you are "telling the story" from. The ability to move your head and select menu options at the same time is a little disorienting at first since you can keep scrolling through options even if you’re not looking at the television, but Mason is also disoriented at this point in the story. He doesn’t know where he is or what’s going on. The odd controls are immersive in the best kind of way, one that lets us get closer to the character’s experience.

It’s smart that selecting Multiplayer takes you to another menu. Though this is standard for Call of Duty games, that standard has an added benefit in this case. The unique way that Black Ops handles its menu only works if there’s a very limited number of options, and multiplayer has far too many stats and game types and guns to fit on a tiny in-game television. Plus, changing menus emphasizes the fact that the multiplayer has nothing to do with the campaign.

In a clever touch, selecting Zombies just adds a green/red filter to the world but doesn’t actually take you to a different screen. This treatment suggests that the two modes, Campaign and Zombies, are connected -- that Zombies takes place in the same world with just a slight twist to it. This is consistent with how this mode is treated in other parts of the game. For example, as soon as you beat the campaign you’re thrown into a Zombie game, as if this undead attack takes place after the campaign story ends.


This cute and brain-bending puzzle game opens with a standard menu. A series of options are organized in a vertical list, and all the standard stuff is there: Single Player, Multiplayer, Leaderboards, etc. It’s colorful and retains the same art style as the game itself, but from a design standpoint it’s a plain menu. That is, until you start selecting things.

Every time that you select an option you get a quiet twang on a variety of instruments. Scroll through the options fast enough and you can play a little song. It’s a fun distraction that fits the whimsical mood of the game, but it gets even better when you realize that the song you can play matches the background music. When timed correctly, you can play along with the background music as if you were part of a band. Scrolling through the menu becomes a game itself, a rhythm game within a puzzle game, and when done successfully, you’re rewarded with an Achievement.

Not only is this a great use of Achievements, encouraging players to experiment with one aspect of the game that would otherwise likely be ignored, but it’s also a creative use of a traditional menu. Whereas the other games that I have mentioned try to create memorable menus by abandoning the usual formula, ilomilo just adds a single, simple new element that makes our normal menu browsing more fun. It doesn’t abandon everything in the search of something new. And perhaps this is the better route to take since it’s more than just a cosmetic change; it turns the menu itself into a game. I know that every time that I start ilomilo I take a moment to play a little jingle before jumping into the game proper. I certainly can’t say that about Metro 2033 or Black Ops. However interesting the cosmetic changes may be at first with these latter two menus, at their core they are still just menus.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.