'Sucker Punch'; The Zack Snyder Experience

More Red Bull-pumped special-effects demo reel than film, which isn't to say it's entirely bad.

Sucker Punch

Director: Zack Snyder
Cast: Emily Browning, Abbie Cornish, Jena Malone, Vanessa Hudgens, Jamie Chung, Carlo Gugino, Oscar Isaac, Jon Hamm, Scott Glenn
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Studio: Warner Bros.
Year: 2011
US Release Date: 2011-03-25

Zack Snyder’s latest fanboy valentine is more like a light, tapping slap than a sucker punch, if you must know. It tells us many things, none of them necessary. We learn that there are many potentially cool ways to mix up World War I battlefields, dragon-lurked fantasy castles, samurai, and out-of-control-trains, if all you’ve really got to worry about is special effects. Actresses in thigh-high stockings, miniskirts, pigtails, and midriff tops sporting high-end assault rifles will make for a killer poster. When an asylum feels compelled to double-advertise itself as being for the “mentally insane” (as opposed to what, the physically insane?), you can be assured that your stay there will not be pleasant. Scott Glenn does not have an inside voice.

Too bad that Snyder and his co-writer Steve Shibuya felt the need to pack all of these lessons into a sort of naughty-magazine fairy tale with a moral slapped on at the end. One would imagine that the filmmaker could have been perfectly happy with being known as that guy who had Vanessa High School Musical Hudgens taking out zombie Huns with a mean-looking axe (yes!) and manning a .50-cal machine gun in a World War II-era bomber being pursued by an angry dragon. All in all, that’s a pretty impressive thing to stick on one’s resume. And truth be told, if Snyder and Shibuya hadn’t tried to wrap it all up into something vaguely sensical, the nonstop lunacy of it all would likely have grown tiring.

But, still. From the opening scenes of Sucker Punch, it’s clear that this is not going to be different enough from any other Snyder confection for it to have any kind of real pulp integrity. A swoony, wordless sequence presents our fair heroine, Babydoll (the clear-eyed and purposeful but still affectless Emily Browning), being tormented by an evil stepfather, who ultimately institutionalizes her. It’s nothing but slow-motion on top of slow-motion, like much of the rest of what follows. (If Snyder ever shot a film in nothing but normal speed, it might run only twenty minutes long.) The look, from Babydoll’s tortured home life to the gothic asylum where she’s imprisoned, is bush-league music-video, circa 1993, as though David Fincher had never graduated from the darting flashlights and extreme close-ups of his Janie’s Got a Gun days. Even before the film drops down the rabbit hole into Babydoll’s mind, it’s kitsch slathered on top of kitsch, overindulgent in ways that makes the design of Burlesque look positively tasteful.

The heart of the matter, what all those storyboards and special-effects artists were used for, is what happens once Babydoll realizes she has five days until a doctor is scheduled to come and perform a lobotomy on her with implements that look straight out of the nineteen century. (The time frame is fuzzy, with outfits and appliances grab-bagged in from all over the place, giving Snyder’s set designers a maximum flexibility and leaving his story in a this-isn’t-real zone that deprives it of any real emotional resonance.) Babydoll discovers that the asylum is actually a front for an exotic-dance club where the unusually-attractive group of female inmates perform for a high-paying, likely criminal clientele. This is all done under the tutelage of a highly campy Carla Gugino, sporting a supposedly Polish accent (“Eef you dohn’t danze, you hef no purpose…”) and some outfits that Sally Bowles would have maimed for.

Figuring she doesn’t want to hang around for the old icepick-to-the-skull (apparently the best way to perform a lobotomy), Babydoll puts together an escape plan that involves working with some of the dancers, saddled with names like Rocket, Amber, and Sweet Pea. In the film’s conceit, every one of the girls’ schemes involves Babydoll putting on a mesmerizing, distracting dance for the men, which viewers never see because during that supposed dance, inside Babydoll’s head, she and the girls are waging highly symbolic video-game war, with help from a wizened, craggy-faced master of whatever (Glenn).

The mix of schoolgirl outfits, high-tech weaponry, and gravity-defying fighting abilities suggest the Pussycat Dolls trained by the Powerpuff Girls and Delta Force. Their opponents, meanwhile, are a grab-bag of Comic-Con, Heavy Metal-style villainy, from 15-foot-tall monster samurai to the afore-mentioned World War I German zombie soldiers and Tolkien-esque orcs, all of whom are dispatched with a minimum of PG-13 fuss. This is all meant to be highly symbolic and empowering.

Fun for a time in its middle stretches, the film achieves for a time a kind of lift-off that more heavily burdened and laughably overwrought exercises in excess like 300 and Watchmen never did. This is aided by a surprisingly vivid supporting cast, particularly a spiky Abbie Cornish as the sort of elder sister of Babydoll’s ragtag band of warrior vixens, and Oscar Isaac, playing their imprisoner as an oily snake-charmer; both of them (along with Gugino) are slumming but they don’t let it show.

But before long, Snyder returns to his point and the film plummets to earth. If the filmmakers hadn’t spent so much time earlier on ensuring that the audience had severed every last claim they had on thinking the film resided in any recognizable physical or emotional reality, then it might have had some staying power once it left the gatling gun-armed giant samurai behind. As it stands, the film is a messy and only fitfully escapist blender of overwrought music interludes and fetish manga styling.

It will be very big in Japan.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.