Jekyll and Hyde

Even twisting the original story to suit a game mechanic can't turn Jekyll and Hyde into something worth playing.

Publisher: bitComposer
Title: Jekyll and Hyde
Price: $19.99
Format: PC
Players: 1
ESRB Rating: Teen
Developer: Pixelcage
Release Date: 2010-09-13

No. No, no no no, no. You play a game like Jekyll and Hyde and two little letters keep coming out of your mouth.

No, no, no.

There's nothing fun about this. The world of PC-exclusive games can so often be a source of hidden gems, of games that might not have the production value of the triple-A releases but offer good stories, thoughtful gameplay, and a sense of intimacy that a game trying to reach the entire world will never achieve. When a PC game falls into my lap that I only have a vague awareness of, I can't wait to play it, to find in it the opportunity to talk about something that whoever is reading this might not have heard of.

The difficult thing here is that I'm also supposed to be honest. So honestly, there is nothing about Jekyll and Hyde to recommend. I want to tell you that it's a diamond in a sea of coal, that it's another entry in a line of recent PC adventure games that hearken back to the halcyon days of exploring, puzzling, pointing, and clicking, but it's not. It's simply a poorly made game that is only noteworthy for design choices that were bad ideas decades before its release.

Example: Checkpoints. No, checkpoints in and of themselves are not bad things. Checkpoints keep us from going crazy; they keep us from punching our screens and throwing our keyboards the way that King's Quest did or Super Mario Bros. did when we fell unwittingly and suddenly out of a tree or into a bottomless pit. Get this, though: checkpoints are the only way to save your game in Jekyll and Hyde. You might find a new path, pick up a key item, or solve one of the game's many fairly basic puzzles, but once you do, you can't save your game. If you have to turn it off or the battery runs out or you just don't feel like going on, well, you'd better hope you remember what you did because you're going to be doing it again.

How can an adventure game -- while admittedly designed with a surprising focus on action and platforming -- get away with checkpoints being its only save mechanism? By being a shockingly linear experience. The player actually feels the checkpoints as play progresses because the game is so utterly linear. You need to obtain all of the relevant items and explore all of the relevant areas to progress to a new set of items and areas. When you start a game, you can start from any of the checkpoints that you've already reached. They appear in order, in a single order, and if you start from an earlier checkpoint, you will progress exactly as you did the last time that you played. There is no experimentation; there is no trying things in a different order to see if anything new can happen. It's always the same.

I know that adventure games are often like this -- that there is typically a fixed set of things that needs to be done in order to progress the plot. Still, most adventure games at least afford the feeling of exploration, of tinkering and playing with things until you hit upon a combination that works. There are a number of concurrent puzzles that can be solved, rather than a little bit of running and jumping combined with one or two menial little item-combination quandaries.

Even the game's primary venue for innovation, the ability for Jekyll to turn into Hyde (and vice versa) at will, is stilted. Jekyll can only turn into Hyde (and back) at the points where one or the other is absolutely required. Try and do it elsewhere, and the potion that triggers the transformation is disabled.

There are recipes to be followed to make potions, but the recipes are so vague that you spend five minutes trying to follow them until you just trial and error it into something that flashes and says you got it.

There is platforming that makes the original Prince of Persia's controls feel like pinpoint precision.

Yes. I am piling on at this point, but there was potential here and that makes the game's failings feel that much more unforgivable. This is a game called Jekyll and Hyde, but it's only loosely (very loosely) based on Stevenson's original text. While this would normally be a strike against the game, it's actually the one thing the game has going for it; by allowing Jekyll and Hyde to be controlled by the player, an outsider, it tweaks the legend for the sake of an appealing mechanic. It sets the stage for puzzles that require careful manipulation of which "side" of the Jekyll/Hyde character is being controlled. At any given time, it opens up the possibility of puzzles that could be solved in different ways by one character or the other.

By squandering a good idea with awful game design and ham-fisted attempts at creating a deep new story, though, the deviation from the original source material is cheapened. Jekyll and Hyde feels like yet another recent example of the mining of a classic piece of literature for the sake of a derivative and underdone game experience. That it is of such a low profile (and done on what must have been a rather low budget) does nothing to alleviate the let down feeling that playing it for any length of time inspires. Let it disappear.


The Best Metal of 2017

Painting by Mariusz Lewandowski. Cover of Bell Witch's Mirror Reaper.

There's common ground between all 20 metal albums despite musical differences: the ability to provide a cathartic release for the creator and the consumer alike, right when we need it most.

With global anxiety at unprecedented high levels it is important to try and maintain some personal equilibrium. Thankfully, metal, like a spiritual belief, can prove grounding. To outsiders, metal has always been known for its escapism and fantastical elements; but as most fans will tell you, metal is equally attuned to the concerns of the world and the internal struggles we face and has never shied away from holding a mirror up to man's inhumanity.

Keep reading... Show less

In Americana music the present is female. Two-thirds of our year-end list is comprised of albums by women. Here, then, are the women (and a few men) who represented the best in Americana in 2017.

If a single moment best illustrates the current divide between Americana music and mainstream country music, it was Sturgill Simpson busking in the street outside the CMA Awards in Nashville. While Simpson played his guitar and sang in a sort of renegade-outsider protest, Garth Brooks was onstage lip-syncindg his way to Entertainer of the Year. Americana music is, of course, a sprawling range of roots genres that incorporates traditional aspects of country, blues, soul, bluegrass, etc., but often represents an amalgamation or reconstitution of those styles. But one common aspect of the music that Simpson appeared to be championing during his bit of street theater is the independence, artistic purity, and authenticity at the heart of Americana music. Clearly, that spirit is alive and well in the hundreds of releases each year that could be filed under Americana's vast umbrella.

Keep reading... Show less

Two recently translated works -- Lydie Salvayre's Cry, Mother Spain and Joan Sales' Uncertain Glory -- bring to life the profound complexity of an early struggle against fascism, the Spanish Civil War.

There are several ways to write about the Spanish Civil War, that sorry three-year prelude to World War II which saw a struggling leftist democracy challenged and ultimately defeated by a fascist military coup.

Keep reading... Show less

'Foxtrot' Is a 'Catch-22' for Our Time

Giora Bejach in Fox Trot (2017 / IMDB)

Samuel Maoz's philosophical black comedy is a triptych of surrealism laced with insights about warfare and grief that are both timeless and timely.

There's no rule that filmmakers need to have served in the military to make movies about war. Some of the greatest war movies were by directors who never spent a minute in basic (Coppola, Malick). Still, a little knowledge of the terrain helps. A filmmaker who has spent time hugging a rifle on watch understands things the civilian never can, no matter how much research they might do. With a director like Samuel Maoz, who was a tank gunner in the Israeli army and has only made two movies in eight years, his experience is critical.

Keep reading... Show less

South Pole Station is an unflinching yet loving look at family in all its forms.

The typical approach of the modern debut novel is to grab its audience's attention, to make a splash of the sort that gets its author noticed. This is how you get a book deal, this is how you quickly draw an audience -- books like Fight Club, The Kite Runner, even Harry Potter each went out of their way to draw in an audience, either through a defined sense of language, a heightened sense of realism, or an instant wash of wonder. South Pole Station is Ashley Shelby's debut, and its biggest success is its ability to take the opposite approach: rather than claw and scream for its reader's attention, it's content to seep into its reader's consciousness, slowly drawing that reader into a world that's simultaneously unfamiliar and totally believable.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.