Toro Y Moi: Underneath the Pine

One year after his stellar debut, Chaz Bundick shifts gears and crafts a hook-heavy disco album full of smooth baselines, snappy synths and overwhelming isolation.

Underneath the Pine

Aritst: Toro Y Moi
Label: Carpark
Us Release Date: 2011-02-22
UK Release Date: 2011-02-21

Toro y Moi's 2010 album Causers of This opens in a daze: a layered ahh drips over crackling vinyl, a backward sampled guitar and, of course, hazy synths. Chaz Bundick enters low in the mix at the ten second mark and pleads, "Come home, in the summer." Then comes the snare-heavy, bass-flirting rhythm that carries lead-off track "Blessa" into a woozy, albeit calculated, 32 minutes of pop bliss.

It was too easy to lump Toro y Moi into that dreaded chillwave genre. Causers of This just sounds like a summer drive with the windows down, beach ball in hand, feet covered in sand. But what Bundick employed (and this is where the calculated comes in) was a hip-hop producer's mindset toward catchy tunes -- "Fax Shadow", "Thanks Vision", and "Freak Love" come to mind. Think Flying Lotus not yet in deep space, instead floating somewhere between the Thermosphere and the Moon. And it's with that producer's gait Toro y Moi transitions into album number two, Underneath the Pine.

Bundick doesn't waste any time on old ideas. Right from opening track "Intro Chi Chi", there's a new producer in town. The ahhs are still there, sure, but distorted guitar, disco beats, and tambourine replace the overwhelming synth wash. It's summer time, but summer in late '70s midwestern America. And, to drive the point home, "New Beat" explodes with multicolored dancefloor pipes and enough groovy bass to get hips shaking instead of shivering in the cold winter months.

Yet while "New Beat" and a host of other tracks on Underneath the Pine warrant fervent dancing, there's a sense of isolation in the music, as if to say, "Yeah, there's a dancefloor, but it's a lonely place at the end of the night when the music recedes into the speakers and the sweaty bodies spill out the club doors onto snow covered streets." Nowhere is this sentiment more apparent than on standout track, "Good Hold". A current pulls the song, carried by what can only be described as a haunted ballet piano melody, underwater. It's one of those beautiful moments in music when listening to a song elicits a physical reaction. We've all felt the effect of drowning -- whether in dreams or reality -- and Bundick captures that sensation with perfect clarity.

Of course, once Bundick resurfaces and shuffles into closing track "Elise," he's still dripping wet from almost drowning moments before: "I knew this was always gonna happen, end up breakin' down when I thought I would have it. Now I can't be fine, lookin' at your smile."

Over the course of Underneath the Pine, Bundick mines the isolation so apparent in the simple piano refrain on "Good Hold". Listening closer, however, reveals the same refrain in the closing seconds of "How I Know", on acoustic guitar in "Before I'm Done", as organ drone and guitar picking on "Elise". It even sounds like Bundick's sewn the refrain into the bassline on the opening track. It's a disparate sound, and it permeates the album as a constant reminder that no matter how hard you try to shrug your problems away by dancing, eventually you have to stop and go home -- a lament many artists from the height of the disco era could relate to when they ran headlong into the hardcore/punk scene backlash of the early '80s.

If Causers of This felt scattershot in some places, and repeptive in others, it was due mostly in part to Bundick's seemingly relentless desire to throw as many ideas as he could at the mixing board to see what stuck. It was a game of musical pin the tail on the donkey. Underneath the Pine sounds like all those ideas distilled to a singular sonic vision: a melancholy disco auteur alone on the dancefloor. The strobe lights burst, the speakers thump, and he questions if he even wants someone else to join in.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.