The Old, Weird America: The World of Bob Dylan's Basement Tapes

Greil Marcus

Despite or even because of its jumble of missing pieces, half-finished recordings, garbled chronologies of composition or performance -- the basement tapes can begin to sound like a map; but if they are a map, what country, what lost mine, is it that they center and fix?

The Old, Weird America: The World of Bob Dylan's Basement Tapes

Publisher: Picador
Price: $18.00
Author: Greil Marcus
Length: 320 pages
Format: Paperback
Publication date: 2011-04
Excerpted from Chapter 1: “Into a Laboratory”, from The Old, Weird America: The World of Bob Dylan's Basement Tapes, 2nd edition by Greil Marcus. Copyright © 2011 by the author and reprinted by permission of Picador, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

Into a Laboratory

Once a singer stood at a world crossroads. For a moment he held a stage no one has more than mounted since— a stage that may no longer exist. More than thirty years ago, when a world now most often spoken of as an error of history was taking shape and form—and when far older worlds were reappearing like ghosts that had yet to make up their minds, cruel and paradisiac worlds that in 1965 felt at once present and impossibly distant—Bob Dylan seemed less to occupy a turning point in cultural space and time than to be that turning point. As if culture would turn according to his wishes or even his whim; the fact was, for a long moment it did.

As a public matter, his story went back only a few years. He was born Robert Allen Zimmerman, in Duluth, Minnesota, in 1941, and grew up in Hibbing, a town in the northern part of the then northernmost state. He first made himself known to more than a few in the early 1960s, in New York City, as the self-proclaimed heir to Dust Bowl balladeer Woody Guthrie. His first album, Bob Dylan, released in 1962, was a collection of folk performances about frolic and death; by 1963, after “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall,” “With God on Our Side,” and “The Times They Are A-Changin’,” he was no longer merely a singer, or a songwriter, or even a poet, let alone simply a folk musician. In a signal way, he was the Folk, and also a prophet. As he sang and wrote he was the slave on the auction block, the whore chained to her bed, a questioning youth, an old man looking back in sorrow and regret. As the familiar standards of the folk revival faded from his repertoire, he became the voice left after the bomb had fallen, the voice of the civil rights movement; then he became the voice of his times and the conscience of his generation. The sound of his hammered acoustic guitar and pealing harmonica became a kind of free-floating trademark, like the peace symbol, signifying determination and honesty in a world of corruption and lies.

All of this was suspended in the air—and, for thousands who had followed Bob Dylan’s progress as a confirmation of their own, dashed to the ground—when in July 1965 the folk singer who once dressed only in fraying cotton appeared onstage at the Newport Folk Festival with an electric guitar in his hands and a high-style black leather jacket on his back (“a sellout jacket,” someone whose name is absent from history called it). With a five-man band around him, a band he would quickly leave behind, he made the most raucous sound he could: an electric noise that to many signified corruption and lies. Though today there may be no person left on earth who would admit to having booed Bob Dylan at Newport, the result on July 25, 1965, was an uproar: a torrent of shouts, curses, refusal, damnation, and perhaps most of all confusion.

Beginning earlier in 1965, with Bringing It All Back Home, Dylan balanced a side of visionary acoustic ballads—“Mr. Tambourine Man,” “Gates of Eden,” “It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue”—with one of comic tunes recorded with a band, and there was little controversy. After Newport, in the fall of 1965, he released the almost fully orchestrated Highway 61 Revisited, which took him to the top of the charts and, to many, onto the back of the Golden Calf. In May 1966 the Depression soul of the folk movement was erased by a dandy dropping the glamorous Blonde on Blonde. Taken together, as a single moment, these records rank with the most intense outbreaks of twentieth-century modernism; they join the whole Gothic-romantic traverse of American self-regard. But the true result of this long year of creation and discovery was no aesthetic artifact to buy or sell, to hoard or discard, but rather a set of public performances: a tour that from the fall of 1965 through the spring of 1966 grew almost nightly in fervor, drama, and, near the end, conflict. Officially all but undocumented, these nights, these events, found their form in rumor, tall tale, and memory.

In a combination completed by various temporary drummers, most notably Mickey Jones of Trini Lopez fame, the musicians Dylan played with on his tour were bassist Rick Danko, organist Garth Hudson, pianist Richard Manuel, and guitarist Robbie Robertson. They were four-fifths of an obscure Toronto honkytonk outfit called the Hawks, once the backing band for Arkansas born rockabilly singer Ronnie Hawkins; in 1968, after they were reunited with their original drummer, Arkansan Levon Helm, who worked with Dylan before jumping ship after two months on the road, they became known as the Band. Starting in Austin, Texas, in September 1965, they crisscrossed the U.S.A. four times. With Jones they pushed on to Australia, Scandinavia, France, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, with no end in sight.

In June 1966, during a brief hiatus, Dylan suffered a motorcycle accident near his home in Woodstock, the old artists’ colony in upstate New York, and went into seclusion. Eventually Danko, Hudson, Manuel, and Robertson, now calling themselves the Crackers, or the Honkies, or nothing, made their way to Woodstock to regroup and to work with Dylan on a film about their tour. Soon enough, in the early summer of 1967, they and Dylan began to meet on an almost daily basis, most often in the basement of a place in West Saugerties they named Big Pink, a house Danko, Hudson, and Manuel were renting; there and elsewhere they made casual music and, after a bit, casual recordings, taping more than a hundred performances of commonplace or original songs. Fourteen of the new tunes they came up with were pressed as an acetate disc, titled “The Basement Tape,” and sent to other musicians. Some of the songs—“Too Much of Nothing,” “Quinn the Eskimo,” “You Ain’t Goin’ Nowhere”—soon turned up as hits by Peter, Paul & Mary, Manfred Mann, and the Byrds, and tapes of the acetate itself leaked out to the general public in 1968. Rolling Stone called for its release, to no avail; by 1970 the music was being pressed onto vinyl and bootlegged everywhere.

The basement tapes— the name shifted slightly in the journey to contraband—became a talisman, a public secret, and then a legend, a fable of retreat and fashioning. When a collection of sixteen basement recordings, plus eight Band demos, was officially released in 1975 and reached the top ten, Dylan expressed surprise: “I thought everybody already had them.” From the first, the most immediately striking basement tape numbers—“I Shall Be Released,” “This Wheel’s on Fire,” “Tears of Rage,” “Down in the Flood,” “Million Dollar Bash”— were recognized for a peculiar grace and spark; for a spirit, as I wrote in the liner notes to the 1975 release, pitched somewhere between the confessional and the bawdy house. The music carried an aura of familiarity, of unwritten traditions, and as deep a sense of self-recognition, the recognition of a self— the singer’s? the listener’s?—that was both historical and sui generis. The music was funny and comforting; at the same time, it was strange, and somehow incomplete. Out of some odd displacement of art and time, the music seemed both transparent and inexplicable.

Next Page

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.