'Buck': Opening Doors

What is clear is that Buck loves what he does, that spending time with horses on the road provides a welcome rhythm and routine.


Director: Cindy Meehl
Cast: Buck Brannaman, Reata Brannaman, Betty Staley
Rated: NR
Studio: Cedar Creek Productions
Year: 2010
US date: 2011-05-31 (Stranger Than Fiction)

"If you find a way to fix this thing right here, it'll make you better. It'll make you better in areas you didn't think were related to horses." Buck Brannaman's students listen carefully when he speaks. They stand alongside their horses, hoping they'll hear in his instructions a solution, whether their animal is fearful or fierce, stubborn or prickly. But clinics with Buck might end up teaching them less about their horses than themselves. "A lot of times," he says, "Rather than helping people with horse problems, I'm helping horses with people problems."

These horses and people come from all over the U.S. or, more precisely, Buck travels all over, holding clinics nine months out of the year. This work -- some people call him an "inspirational speaker" -- keeps him away from home, the wife Mary and three daughters. As he settles down to a plate of French fries in an empty restaurant, he notes that being alone has costs "You wanna be home and you think of what it would be like to just be walking barefoot across the living room and going to bed. There's no way that's ever going to be anything than what it is."

It's not clear whether he's resigned to his own loneliness or philosophical about the state of all men. What is clear is that he loves what he does, that spending time with horses on the road provides a welcome rhythm and routine. This emerges early in Buck, winner of the Audience Award at Sundance and Full Frame, and screening at Stranger Than Fiction on 31 May, followed by a Q&A with director Cindy Meehl, then opening in selected theaters on 17 June.

It's also clear in the film that he's developed a persona (he drinks his coffee black, he says, "I’m sure that comes as a big surprise) and a devoted following. Most of the interviewees here are clients and, as Betty Staley describes herself, "converts." They believe in him, they've seen him work miracles with damaged horses. And they admire his story, that is, a severely abusive father who had him and his older brother Smokie, doing rope tricks for money by the time Buck was six.

This story unfolds slowly during the documentary, told partly by friends (ranch owner Gary Myers tears up when he tells it) and partly by Robert Redford, who used Buck as one of the models for The Horse Whisperer ("I knew that Buck was really a special guy," he says, "To come through that abuse and rather than repeating it, he said, 'I'm not gonna have that in my life'"). Add to this that Buck's mother died when he was young ("I knew my life was over as I knew it," he remembers, "I no longer had my protector") and that a coach rescued him after spotting whip marks on the boy's back -- and Buck's story is straight-up remarkable. As Staley puts it, "Horses get discouraged by riders who shut the doors. And Buck's really good at opening doors."

Still, the film is not only a celebration of Buck's achievements or chronicle of his current rescue projects. And it's not only a portrait of a man and horses -- though the many shots of Buck on or alongside horses, in green fields or dusty corrals, their movements in harmony and or in tension, are lovely. Beyond such images, which might be expected in a movie about a horse trainer, the film also considers how Buck engages with people. And it's in such moments, more familiar, that the film is most compelling.

Buck makes no bones about his own residual anger, the difficulty he has in remembering his father. "I wouldn’t attribute any of my positive virtues to my dad whatsoever," he says, as the film shows Buck and Smokie as adorable little cowboys, blindfolded and twirling lariats on TV. "I know you're not supposed to hate anybody, but the hurt that he caused me, I never really got over it. So, I live in the moment." That moment sometimes includes his daughter Reata and her friend Nevada Watt, who ride along with Buck in the summer, when they're not in school. Reata observes, "Traveling with dad, it can get pretty stressful sometimes, because he can be the travel Nazi." You know, she explains, completing thoughts you've already started while watching him adhere to his routine, "He has his own little way of doing things that we can mess up sometimes."

That's not to say Buck isn't charming and patient on screen: he jokes that Reata is sometimes too much "like" him, according to his wife (and he's damn proud that she already "out-ropes most men," and will soon be better than he is). And, when the camera catches him cleaning his trailer with a Dustbuster, he jokes again about learning from Oprah that "the greatest aphrodisiac for a man is to have a vacuum and to actually run it in the presence of his wife."

As awkward as Buck may feel in front of the camera (and he recalls being painfully shy, almost unable to speak when he first started doing clinics), the film makes use of his absence during its most startling sequence, when Julie is unable to salvage her horse -- or, as Buck sees it, herself. The drama begins while Buck is off-screen, and a friend, Dan, works with the horse, Kelly. Fractious, frightened, and difficult at every step, Kelly actually attacks Dan, teeth gnashing. Bloodied and a little stunned, Dan steps back, and the assembled crowd awaits Buck's return to the scene, as if awaiting a savior. The film cuts to Buck's instruction to Julie, that her own instability is bringing on Kelly's and likely her other horses' too. "Maybe there's something for you to learn about you," he says, gently but also, in the moment, brutally. Julie looks stricken. "That horse is a mirror," he says, his words clipped. "All your horses are a mirror to your soul and sometimes you might not like what you see."

The scene -- alarming and violent -- is over in just a couple of minutes, but the effect lingers. If horses, like Buck, live in the moment, and so, can respond to him, people bring their baggage -- resentment and frustration, hope and desperation. Asked by an uncomprehending student why he doesn't punish Kelly, Buck offers yet another lesson: "To have contempt for the horse would never even occur to me." People have to be responsible, the film shows. Buck included.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.