Sydney Film Festival 2011: 'Sleeping Beauty'

Sleeping Beauty is a clever and knowing perversion of the fairy tale.

Sleeping Beauty

Director: Julia Leigh
Cast: Emily Browning, Rachael Blake, Ewen Leslie
Distributor: Transmission Films

From start to finish, Sleeping Beautyis a mesmerizing and profoundly disturbing piece of work, one that derives a good dose of its power from always keeping us off balance and unsure about what will happen next. This is clearly the intention of its director, novelist-turned-filmmaker Julia Leigh; at a Q&A session after the screening of the film, a member of the audience accused her of “failing to explain what the meaning of the movie is”. Leigh sat there stony-faced and rolled her eyes.

The film, a clever and knowing perversion of the fairy tale, centers on Lucy, played by Emily Browning, a university student in Sydney who could be completely normal. But she is not, and Leigh chooses to withdraw her completely from any wider interactions with society and depict her working ata number of menial part-time jobs. She seems to view others with a certain disdain or contempt, but her interest is piqued when a strange advertisement appears in the newspaper.

In a stately lounge room, she meets Clara – Rachael Blake in a unflinchingly tough, matriarchal role – who tells her the specifics of her job. She will be a lingerie waitress, waiting on older men at their dinner parties. She will be ludicrously well-paid, with the prospect of promotion. These dinners, incidentally, have decidedly old-fashioned etiquette, with something of an old world décor; this as naked women keel in the fetal position by the fireplace. Some of the more outrageous lines in this film have already been publicized, such as when Clara instructs Lucy, “your vagina will not be penetrated. Your vagina will be a temple”. From there, the film gets even more nasty; Lucy drinks a tea which puts her to sleep. She is put in a room and men are allowed inside to do whatever they like to her except penetrate her. This occurs at Clara’s house, an ornate colonial mansion out in the countryside which leaves no doubt that this is a game of the elite.

Emily Browning gives a very game performance, and is ideal for the role with her porcelain-like appearance and ability to express a lot through almost nothing. There is no escaping the nudity in this film; it is there to confront you, at times to make you want to cower away from the screen. The implication that these older men are willing to indulge in expensive sexual fantasies with a younger woman because of a deep sense of personal shame or lack of ability to feel powerful will be very uncomfortable to some. At one point, one of the men turns to Clara and confesses that he feels his life has been wasted, as if this is a justification for his behavior; she stares on in a mixture of pity and horror. This scene, one of only a few where there is extended dialogue, is spellbinding.

Leigh’s filming style is taut, with an emphasis on formal perfection and mise-en-scene that makes Sleeping Beauty seem like an Australian cousin of Michael Haneke’s films. The room in which Emily is put to sleep, particularly, has a staging about it that is very particular and deliberate. It sets up a feel and distinctive look to the film that is highly accomplished for a first-time director.Leigh has described watching the film as being like a “witness” to its goings-on – she notably avoided the term ‘voyeur’. The dialogue has an unusual echo that makes what is being said sound more portentous, and it resonates within the film’s rooms of polished cedar. It’s also apparent that Leigh has many influences; I thought I could discern some Catherine Breillatin there, as well as traces of a performance art aesthetic of the kind that Marina Abramovic and Yoko Ono used to perform.

The film is also about the confusion and haze of the early twenties, as seen through Browning’s character who seems to care nothing for what others think of her, but becomes more curious as to what is being done to her while she’s asleep. In this sense, it doubles as an existentialist parable. Sleeping Beautycaptivated me; it is revolutionary in its style and approach to its subject matter, and people have already reacted strongly against it. But like Jane Campion’s first films (Campion was a producer and mentor on this film), I have a feeling it will be revisited and acknowledged for the genius that it is. The Sydney Film Festival has been buzzing with talk of it, and once you have seen it, it’s impossible to get out of your mind.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

It's just past noon on a Tuesday, somewhere in Massachusetts and Eric Earley sounds tired.

Since 2003, Earley's band, Blitzen Trapper, have combined folk, rock and whatever else is lying around to create music that manages to be both enigmatic and accessible. Since their breakthrough album Furr released in 2008 on Sub Pop, the band has achieved critical acclaim and moderate success, but they're still some distance away from enjoying the champagne lifestyle.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.