'Curb Your Enthusiasm' Season Eight

Curb Your Enthusiasm might be the most traditional sitcom currently on the air.

Curb Your Enthusiasm

Airtime: Sundays, 10pm ET
Cast: Larry David, Jeff Garlin
Subtitle: Season Eight
Network: HBO
Creator: Larry David
Air date: 2011-07-10

In its eight season, Curb Your Enthusiasm continues its long run as a public therapy session for Larry David. Playing a hyper-stylized version of himself, David will now have spent 80 episodes deconstructing his past as a co-creator of Seinfeld, his now-defunct marriage, and his own narcissistic and obnoxious personality.

Luckily, David is an amusing subject on the couch. But the dirty little secret about Curb Your Enthusiasm is that it might be the most traditional sitcom currently on the air. At its core, Curb has more in common with golden age sitcoms such as I Love Lucy and The Honeymooners than The Office and, yes, Seinfeld.

Despite being original and sometimes shocking in its subject matter or language, Curb is stubbornly throwback in its structure. Most half-hour comedies today feature ensemble casts, which makes for a more fluid and unpredictable show (which reached a kind of culmination in Seinfeld's four intersecting storylines, one for each of the main characters). Curb puts Larry David, the character, front and center in nearly every scene.

In this, it recalls Lucille Ball's several series, where she was the catalyst for the comedy. Most episodes took typically mundane situations to ridiculous extremes due to Lucy’s unique character flaws. Likewise, nothing happens on Curb Your Enthusiasm that is not the direct result of David’s inability to keep himself from saying exactly what's on his mind. But based on a sampling of episodes from the new season, the humor of his observations is starting to grow stale. Watching David confront someone for doing something annoying is no longer interesting, yet it happens again and again. The viewer knows it is going to end badly, because it always does. How many more times can we watch David invent a flimsy excuse to get out of a charitable obligation, only to get caught in a blatant lie? The repetition betrays a laziness, as the show falls back on a formula that here might be described as Seinfeld Lite.

However, Curb has not completely run out of gas. It is still the sharpest show on TV when it turns its attention to subjects that no one else would dare touch. One episode blithely skewers the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by abandoning eschewing political correctness and crassly prioritizing great food and sex -- even if it means accepting vitriolic anti-Semitism. In another inspired series of bits, David and Leon (JB Smoove) test the theory that white people only trust African American men who wear glasses.

Curb Your Enthusiasm reached its creative peak in Season Six. David’s wife, Cheryl (Cheryl Hines), convinced him to take in an African American family who had lost everything in a hurricane. This unifying arc was combined with an honest portrayal of the dissolution of David’s marriage due to his own character flaws. It was funny and even poignant at times, the furthest thing from a show "about nothing.” In terms of David’s therapy, that season could have been considered a breakthrough, and the series might have been better off ending with that season’s final episode, which felt like a series finale.

The new season follows somewhat from last, which reunited the cast and crew from Seinfeld for an inspired arc that both honored and addressed the legacy of David’s previous show. Now much is being made about David returning to New York City. If he hadn’t already had that full season catharsis with the Seinfeld crew, this might have been more of an event. Instead, his obnoxious behavior doesn’t seem as out of place on the streets of Manhattan as it does in the restaurants of Los Angeles.

Certainly, David is associated with New York because of Seinfeld, but this plot turn lacks the emotional impact of a prodigal son returning home. Then again, Curb Your Enthusiasm is not about viewers, our feelings, or what we might want to see. It's all about David, the patient. The show has always been about his selfishness. Maybe coming home is the final stage in his therapy.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.