This 'Conan' Exists on a Likeable, Lunkheaded Lunatic Fringe

If all you are looking for is a solid action movie to end the Summer of 2011 on, Conan the Barbarian will serve your needs nicely. Insanely, but nicely.

Conan the Barbarian

Director: Marcus Nispel
Cast: Jason Momoa, Rachel Nichols, Stephen Lang, Rose McGowan
Rated: R
Studio: Lionsgate
Year: 2011
US date: 2011-08-19 (General release)
UK date: 2011-08-24 (General release)

There are two obvious Marcus Nispels. There's the horror remake god, a man responsible for giving The Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Friday the 13th a cruel, contemporary spin. This Nispel loves to lure audiences into a sense of false security, only to later leap out and hack away the precepts with power tools and machetes. While many in the fright film fanbase scoff at the suggestion, the German director should be the first name on every studio suits terror revamp list - he's just that good. Then there is the other Marcus Nispel, the filmmaker who forgot his craft with the crappy Viking epic Pathfinder. Oh sure, as an example of deranged, over the top sword and sweat swashbuckling, it was acceptable. But when compared with his lean and mean macabre, it appeared arch and unnecessarily busy.

Now, after teaching the newest Jason Voorhees how to slice and dice his way directly into an irritating teen's blood supply comes his take on the classic character Conan the Barbarian. Beloved by pulp fiction devotees as well as the Arnold Schwarzenegger cult, the muscular thief with a limited vocabulary and an infinite amount of rage is returning to the big screen in a splashy, splattery spectacle. Just don't call it a remake and you'll be just fine. Instead of using the campy original with all its memorable (and laughable) dialogue and John Milius made machismo, Nispel goes back to the source and struggles to stay faithful. Apparently, with cold, calculated contemporary killers, he's more than capable. Turn things medieval and it's filmmaker goes a bit...nutzoid?

Born in the midst of battle - via a more or less self-inflicted Caesarian - Conan (Leo Howard, then Jason Momoa) grows up to be one of the fiercest young warriors in his tribe. This makes his brooding blacksmith father (Ron Pearlman) very proud. Helping him forge a specific sword to maximize his strengths and skills, Dad comes to teach his talented son the ways of a barbarian. When a evil overlord named Khalar Zym (Stephen Lang) comes marauding through his village looking for the final piece of an enchanted headdress, he destroys everything that Conan knows and loves. Leaving the boy for dead, the villain rides off on a plan to resurrect his dead wife and earn the power of the Gods. Why? Well, to rule the world, of course. Naturally, Conan ages and seeks revenge on those who wronged him. He winds up defending a young monk (Rachel Nichols) who has the 'pure blood' Zym and his witch daughter (Rose McGowan) are looking for to complete their sinister sacrificial ceremony.

If all you are looking for is a solid action movie to end the Summer of 2011 on, Conan the Barbarian will serve your needs nicely. Insanely, but nicely. Nispel, working from a committee script long in development, takes a simple story - Conan's family is killed, Conan goes after those who wronged him - adds in a necessary supernatural subplot - main baddies wants blood to make his magic mask work - and then goes from gory gonzo set-piece to gory gonzo set-piece piling on the violence. There are sword battles and fist fights, sand zombies and predatory pirates. From sinister sea monsters to a sharp toothed humanoid lizard man army, this is speculative fiction by way of perverse peplum. As veins are drained and heads role, we become transfixed by what Nispel is doing, and how he has chosen to magnify the mayhem.

Jason Momoa makes an excellent Conan. He's more Hercules than homunculus with more going on behind his eyes than muscleman allure. This is a thinking warrior, a man with a plan that (usually) succeeds. We enjoy watching him one-up his foes, his victories the result of brain power as much as brute strength. Sure, he has to fall for Tamara and have a slinky sex scene with her, but for the most part, Conan is a loner and out to reap justice with the sharpened edge of a finally honed blade - and Momoa makes the most of this. Lang, on the other hand, is hidden for the first half of the movie, a far cry from his manic Marine myth in Avatar. Still, along with an oddly out of place McGowan, the evil end of the narrative is fleshed out in full scenery chewing mode.

Along with several intriguing ancillary characters that serve their purpose and then rightfully disappear (perhaps, to be used in later installments of the franchise?), we get a nice balance between the human and the heroic. Of course, the unnecessary use of 3D doesn't help matters much and you can really tell that much of the backdrop scope here is greenscreened CG...and yet we really don't mind. Nispel is such a nimble director, capable of such grand leaps of logistical logic and scaled sense that we smile at their utter ridiculousness. When it's all over, we just can't help by grin in goofy, guilty, delight. This is a filmmaker who languishes over a shot of our hunky hero thrusting his finger into the gaping nose hole of a defaced baddie and never once apologizes for the ballsy brutality.

Of course, those who have based their entire affection for this character on Arnold's limited linguistic take will be disappointed, By Crom! With Nispel, it's the action that's over the top, not the nutty nonsense mythos dialogue. Others will argue about the Lord of the Rings lite narrative (pieces of a missing evil talisman being sought by a despot desperate to rule the world...) and lack of legitimacy re: Robert E. Howard's original. Whatever the issue, there are few filmmakers like Nispel, and few films like Conan the Barbarian. As a solid citizen of modern horror, the talented European auteur has few equals. Now, after conquering yet another substantive sub-genre, maybe he can stop being of two different minds and just be one Marcus Nispel - master of amazing movie mayhem.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.