Semper Fi: Always Faithful

Master Sgt. Jerry Ensminger is the kind of person, you come to see in Semper Fi: Always Faithful, who takes the Marine Corps' credo utterly seriously.

Semper Fi: Always Faithful

Director: Tony Hardmon, Rachel Libert
Cast: Jerry Ensminger, Michael Partain, Thomas Townsend, Denita McCall
Rated: NR
Studio: Wider Film Projects
Year: 2010
US date: 2011-08-26 (Limited release)
When we began making the film we were somewhat cynical about how much one man could achieve when fighting the U.S. government. Jerry and his team have dispelled any doubts that we had.

-- Rachel Libert

"In 1997, I was fixing a plate of food in the kitchen," says Master Sgt. Jerry Ensminger, "Getting ready for the evening news." What he heard on the TV changed everything: a scientific report linked birth defects and childhood cancers to water contamination at Camp Lejeune, where he and his family had lived. "I dropped my plate, right there. I mean, it was like God was saying to me, 'Here is a glimmer of hope, that you will find your answer.'"

Ensminger's question concerned the death of his nine-year-old daughter, Janey, some 14 years earlier. She'd had leukemia, and throughout her illness and after her passing, he wondered why. "That's the kind of question that doesn't go away," he says. And he's the kind of person, you come to see in Semper Fi: Always Faithful, who takes the Marine Corps' credo utterly seriously. He assumed the military would want to look after its own people, but instead he runs into one roadblock after another, as he tries to learn how that contamination entered the water supply at Camp Lejeune -- and also, how it the water remained contaminated from 1957 through 1987.

As Ensimnger and Major Tom Townsend (who lost his six-week-old son to a heart defect while he lived at Lejeune) investigate, the film shows Tom's book-lined office in Idaho, shots of U.S. flags, photos of soldiers, and a bumper sticker ("One a Marine, Always a Marine"), emblems of their lifelong commitments that also hint at how disappointed they will be. When the Marine Corps accidentally posts a collection of documents on line that reveal it had improperly disposed of toxic cleaning solvents -- and knew it was doing so -- Townsend and Ensminger spend long hours on their dialup connection downloading. But, Ensminger says, the evidence hardly moves the powers that be to take responsibility. "You name it, they committed it: stonewall, incorrect information" he says. "I started to slowly realize that these people were not going to do right by their people they were going to have to be forced to do it. And that burden fell on me."

Rachel Libert and Tony Hardmon's film -- opening as part of DocuWeeks at New York's IFC Center on 26 August and in LA 2 September -- follows Ensminger and Townsend as they put together their case, along with two other victims and activists, Mike Partain, who was born at Lejeune and diagnosed with male breast cancer in 2007, and Denita McCall, once stationed at Lejeune and then diagnosed with aplastic anemia and parathyroid cancer.

In her first scene in the film, McCall sits at her kitchen table to read a letter describing her condition. "This stuff happens fast," she says. "Lots of people are given a really bad prognosis and told that they're going to die and that there's no chance," she goes on, "I just can't believe that, Rachel. I refuse to believe that there's no chance." It's an unsettling moment in a film that's full of them, for as McCall explicitly addresses her interviewer, she's speaking to you as well, breaking through the usual distance you assume between yourself and a documentary's talking head.

The film's appeal is much like the strategy devised by Ensminger and his fellows, as they come up against numerous and sadly predictable obstacles. A Congressional committee holds a hearing, Ensminger testifies, and then, nothing. (As he puts it, "They held the hearing, they got great accolades for it, and then they just dropped the ball.") The group members bring their own skills and energies to the mission: Townsend doesn't like to travel, but researches tirelessly, while Partain, an insurance adjuster, knows how to dig into files for pertinent information. Jerry Ensminger is a charismatic speaker and dedicated to the cause; his two adult daughters lament that he's been so "overly consumed with this, this is his life," but also understand that he means to do right by Janey, and also to help those other victims who don't know they are victims.

When the Marine Corps (embodied here by several officers who talk around the issue and especially, a Marine Corps representative named Kelly Dreyer) indicate that "It would be a very difficult and laborious task" to contact all people who might have been contaminated at Lejeune (and, it turns out, other bases as well), the former Marines and Partain, the son of a Marine, undertake to "look after their own," themselves, "You don’t quit, you just keep going," Ensminger asserts after yet another bureaucratic setback. "And I'll go kick some damn doors down tomorrow."

This door-kicking involves media appearances as well as visits with veterans' groups. When Partain's wife admits that she's not inclined to "make a big scene," the camera pans directly to Mike, seated beside her: "I'm totally opposite of that," he says. The movie shows him and Ensminger addressing one meeting after another, as Partain explains that the afflicted population's "weakness," that they are spread all over the country now, rather than consolidated like the people at Love Canal, soon becomes their strength. "As word of this gets out," he says, they will be able to pressure hundreds of congressmen and senators, "because we're in every town in America."

As the film follows their travels, it also advocates for their cause. Given the passion that Ensminger and others bring to the story, Semper Fi mostly needs to observe, though occasional images or empty swings in a back yard or Jerry traipsing through the woods with his hunting rifle ("I come up here to get away from the daily stress") help to underline its poignancy and also, their perseverance. It's not startling, anymore, to hear that a bureaucracy is refusing to take responsibility for damage it's done. But it is still heartening to see the commitment of those fighting. As McCall puts it, "To a point, it’s the Marine Corps' fault that Jerry and Tom and I and the rest of us veterans are fighting so hard. They trained us to be this way."


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.