Deus Ex: Human Revolution

The nice thing about the gameplay in this iteration of Deus Ex is that it builds up alongside your own character's development. As you “cyber up” by spending points to augment Adam, the game ramps up in complexity alongside you and grows in its capacity to serve up satisfying situations to resolve.

Deus Ex: Human Revolution

Publisher: Square Enix
Players: 1
Price: $59.99
Platform: Xbox 360 (reviewed), Playstation 3, PC
ESRB: Mature
Developer: Eidos Montreal
Release Date: 2011-08-23

So, I should begin by saying that I never played Deus Ex: Invisible War and that I haven't played the original Deus Ex since its release in 2000. As a result, I am unaware of any direct relationships between the plots of the various games, and my feelings about the way that the gameplay compares to the original are related only to distant memories of that original foray into Deus Ex's world of science-fiction-themed espionage. I do recall, of course, that Deus Ex was (and still is) a game much celebrated for its innovations in allowing players a wide variety of choices in approaching and solving problems in a game world, and I do remember that I loved the game when I played it over a decade ago. However, I only have the vaguest sense of the story and gameplay that I remember thinking was so unique at the time.

That being said, the more that I played Deus Ex: Human Revolution, the more the original title and its style came back to me. It was familiar little bits that I recognized: collecting passwords and passcodes that might be useful later, finding fixed pads containing information on the world, “cybering up” to jump higher, hack more effectively, and the like, and just generally really stopping to consider my options every time that I approached a new room full of enemies that wanted nothing more than to seek me out and annihilate me.

However, the game doesn't begin this way. The opening set piece that establishes the motivation for the player's avatar, Adam Jensen, serves as a tutorial that didn't do much to reaffirm my faith in my fond memories of Deus Ex. Playing through the opening scene, I feared that I was playing some sort of mediocre shooter and maybe that the years had not been kind to Deus Ex's mechanics. The game is a bit of a slow starter.

The first main story mission then sort of re-introduced what I felt to be the core of Deus Ex-style gameplay. Deus Ex is a game of infiltration whether you decide to perform that infiltration as a sneaky and silent killer, a hacker extraordinaire that uses an installation's electronic defenses against it, or whether your form of “infiltration” is to muscle through with heavy firepower. This first extended mission, though, felt too straightforward, too by-the-numbers, as “alternate routes” seemed like the only real paths through the level and, thus, that Deus Ex's much vaunted “choices” were only being served up as an illusion of choice, a nod to the original's innovation.

Yeah, yeah, of course I would be crawling through the ventilation system to circumvent that room. I have nowhere near the firepower or sneaking skills to make my way past a room full of five heavily armed opponents. No real choice there, I thought.

However, this “slowness” in re-introducing the idea of building a character your way and then approaching various situations in the way that seems most expedient to you was just that: a slow build up. The game's developers seem to have been wise enough to recognize that if you are going to build a slow leveling-up system into a game like Human Revolution that you don't just throw the most difficult scenarios at the player outright; they need to gain some skills first (through the obvious RPG-style character building), but also some experience in approaching the game's problems by just dealing with some simple problems initially. The nice thing about the gameplay in this iteration of Deus Ex is that it builds up alongside your own character's development. As you “cyber up” by spending points to augment Adam, the game ramps up in complexity alongside you and grows in its capacity to serve up satisfying situations to resolve.

This, I believe, was the the great strength of the original game -- the idea that a video game with action doesn't have to be about having tremendous reflexes or a really long health bar. Instead, Deus Ex and this sequel really do place the emphasis in combat on strategy, with each room in an installation causing the player to pause to consider the “puzzle” of combat before attempting to execute a reasonable solution to the problem at hand. This emphasis allows for “skills” that are not normally required for most modern shooters, like, say, a Call of Duty game. Exploration, for example, is not only handy, it is vital to survive and may lead to unheard of solutions, like *gasp* avoiding killing everyone in a room for the sake of practicality, expediency, and the mission. Human Revolution, like its predecessor, is still the thinking man's combat simulation.

That being said, there is a real trial-and-error quality of play that is reminiscent of PC games of a previous generation. You can save anywhere in the 360 version (which is the version that I played) of Human Revolution, which is kind of a required component of play, since you are going to run into some situations very much half cocked and get yourself summarily dispatched as a result. I longed for a quick save feature coupled with a less arduous reload of save files, as making mistakes is definitely part of the process in playing the game. I suspect that had I played on a PC, I would be scoring this game higher just for that very reason (and since I am recommending the game one way or the other because it really is very, very good, I guess what I am trying to say is that you probably want to play the PC version if you have the option).

On a console, you will probably be spending more time than you want to watching load screens that are just long enough to aggravate (and aggravate even moreso if you reload after failing to execute a plan and then your reload leads to you blundering it again almost immediately, which will, again, probably happen a lot). With quick saves and shorter reloads, this process becomes just a part of play, but with teeth gratingly slow loads, it just becomes unnecessarily tedious.

Nevertheless, my impatience with loading times does not trump the sheer joy of traversing a room that you thought would be impossible to get through because you discovered some fiendishly clever way to take advantage of a hacked turret or just the right time to engage your cloaking field or just pulled off a wicked tranquilizer takedown of three guards. In this regard, I feel pretty sure that the mid to late game of Human Revolution is a real clear successor to the strengths of the original title. The deeper you get into the game, the more rewarding the play becomes.

Beyond clearly being indebted to that predecessor's game design, Human Revolution also wears its narrative inspirations on its sleeve. The plot (especially initially) has a very similar structure to the original game: get introduced to the folks you're working for, get a sense of the world and its politics and how some of those politics might not mesh with the position of those you work for, get a sense that there isn't something quite right about who you are working for, oh, and then go overseas for some reason. It does diverge in some ways from that kind of set up, but the “don't trust anyone in authority” vibe of its cyberpunk forebears is definitely still at play here. The other very specific influence that one can't avoid seeing in the game's themes and aesthetics is Blade Runner.

The “augs” transitioning from flesh and blood to transhuman cyborgs, which Adam shares much in common with himself but that he is also facing off against, have some striking similarities to the replicants in Ridley Scott's film. While Adam is a rather stoic and efficient operative (stuck with a stock faux Clint Eastwood mumble/growl whenever he opens his mouth), he, nevertheless, is clearly having a bit of an existential crisis of sorts a la Harrison Ford's Deckard. Like that character, he is questioning his own humanity in relation to “things,” the other augs, (and maybe himself, too) that resemble the human but might also be becoming something much more. Oh, and, man, does Adam's apartment resemble Deckard's apartment, including even the slanting of electric light through its windows, barely illuminating his darkened living space. The game is dark like Blade Runner, moodily musically scored like Blade Runner, and its characters brood like the characters of Blade Runner.

However, this is all good because the major themes of Human Revolution absolutely relate to the dialogue created by the work of Philip K. Dick and William Gibson and also Scott's movie about what it means to be human in a world where man is capable of redefining humanity through technologies that enhance strangth, speed, and perception beyond what might be deemed “natural.” Despite some uneven voice acting, the main plot is both a good thriller and good sci-fi, engaging with questions that still haven't been fully resolved, despite the wave of cyberpunk of the 1980s and 1990s that attempted to eke out some answers about humans' relationship to (and especially integration with) technology.

Matching the gameplay itself, while the world is fairly open, as it offers the opportunity to locate some side missions by engaging with NPCs in several cities that serve as transition points between the main infiltration missions, these missions do add less toHuman Revolution, though, as they tend to trot out some rather tired video game cliches and stock characters.

Yes, you can run a mission or two out of a brothel for a working girl concerned about the safety of one of her fellow hookers. Ho hum. And, yes, one of your allies at Sarif industries has an old friend's murder that she wants you to look into because “something doesn't feel right about it.” Mmm hmmm. These aren't the game's best moments and serve to distract from the much more tightly plotted and definitely more interesting central storyline.

And it is a storyline worth pursuing through its multi-pathed endings partly because it is good and largely because that pursuit grows increasingly more challenging and more worthwhile through truly interesting gameplay. Traditionally, the release of a Madden title marks the beginning of the holiday game season, but with Human Revolution's release coming a week earlier than Madden, it feels like the arrival of strong triple-A releases for the holiday season are maybe already being indicated by this release. If the quality of Deus Ex is an indicator of this year's crop, it could be a very good season for gamers this year.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.