Grateful Dead: Europe ’72 Volume 2

Jedd Beaudoin

On the eve of a massive Europe '72 boxed set, this primer (and sequel) doesn't quite have the spark or majesty of the original Europe '72.

Grateful Dead

Europe '72 Volume 2

Label: Rhino
US Release Date: 2011-09-20
UK Release Date: 2011-09-20

With the imminent wide release of Europe ’72: The Complete Recordings, a 73-disc collection which provides listeners with every note from the Grateful Dead’s legendary 1972 European tour, this two-disc collection might temper one’s temptation to race headlong into such a massive undertaking. Coming nearly 40 years after the release of the monumental Europe ‘72, this sequel doesn’t live up to the original and, in fact, doesn’t come close to living up to several other archival recordings that have seen the light of day in recent years.

Because we Dead fans are obsessives and completists, the band’s archivist, David Lemieux, wisely chose only songs that did not appear on the original collection, including three that were bound for the original release but, as Peter Wolf might say, must have got lost, namely “Beat It on Down the Line”, “Next Time You See Me” and “Sing Me Back Home”. Moreover, care has been taken in other areas: “Good Lovin’” and “Dire Wolf” from the April 26 show at Frankfurt’s Jahrhunderthalle were not released on the 1995 collection Hundred Year Hall. There’s also the inclusion of “Dark Star” and “The Other One” in an hour-long jam from the Bickershaw Festival in Wigan, England – the only time those tracks were performed during the entire ’72 outing.

Where’s the beef? Well, it’s the Dead, so there are amazing moments of sublime distraction throughout. It’d be hard not to smile at the sound of “Sugaree”, and Ron “Pigpen” McKernan’s delivery of “Chinatown Shuffle” finds the band sounding looser, more relaxed than normal. It’s also a fantastic reminder that, for many, Pigpen was the early focal point of the band. That track and “Loser”, “Black-Throated Wind”, and several others are culled from an especially inspired set at Tivoli Concert Hall in Copenhagen, Denmark. On those tracks, the guitar playing, rhythm section and even Garcia’s vocals are especially vibrant.

This trek also marks the entrance of Keith and Donna Godchaux, undeniably the two most controversial figures in Grateful Dead history, but, here, as on the original Europe ‘72, the mannerisms that by the end of the ‘70s would make the couple almost intolerable in the context of the Dead, are wholly absent. Keith’s keyboards are especially inspired throughout and provide evidence of how he came upon the gig in the first place.

The downside of the collection, and one thing that has long angered this writer, is the abuse that Garcia inflicted upon his beautiful voice. When he possessed full power of that fine instrument – see “Tennessee Jed” from the original Europe ‘72 for a prime example – his ability to move the listener was infinite. When that amazing voice was compromised – such as on the opening “Bertha” here, where he sounds a little road weary – it’s hard to listen to the damage done to such a fragile but integral element of the Dead’s music and not feel a little cheated.

In the end, the first collection here is more sure-fire than the second: aside from a fairly strong reading of Merle Haggard’s “Sing Me Back Home”, the second disc wallows in subpar performances and suffers from a mix that is occasionally zero dimensional. Aside from their rarity, the Bickershaw tracks are hit-and-miss and, although perhaps of interest to completists, those seeking the real power and awe of the Dead are best advised to look toward the first Europe ‘72 album or several of the aforementioned archival recordings from the era. Like many sequels, this one also disappoints, but maybe that’s also part of its charm. In fact, if you’ll excuse me, I have to place an order for the Europe ’72: The Complete Recordings boxed set. No matter what, it seems I just can’t get enough of the Dead.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.