Our Animals, Ourselves: Jenny Diski's 'What I Don't Know About Animals'

Don’t be fooled by the cover. Jenny Diski’s book isn’t really about animals; it’s about us.

What I Don't Know About Animals

Publisher: Yale University Press
Length: 320 pages
Author: Jenny Diski
Price: $26.00
Format: Hardcover
Publication date: 2011-08

Animal enthusiasts have no shortage of reading options these days. Inside of a Dog, You Had Me At Woof, and Unlikely Friendships have all topped bestseller lists recently, bringing pet owners closer to their furry family members. Vegetarians and animal-rights advocates were treated to Jonathan Safran Foer's shining prose and expert storytelling in 2009's Eating Animals. From the looks of the cover, Jenny Diski offers similar fare in her nonfiction book, What I Don't Know About Animals.

But then, we all know what they say about judging books by their covers. As the title suggests, there's a lot we don't (and truly can't) know about animals; What I Don't Know About Animals exists in that space. This book doesn't claim to take us inside animals. It explores, via travel book format, how we think about them -- how we view them, breed them, farm, kill, and eat them, and how we still fail to really know how they experience this world.

It's a worthy exploration. Diski draws on a wide range of animal influence in our culture, considering philosophers' views, scientific use, the farming industry, and her own personal experiences with animals to paint a multi-dimensional portrait of how we look at animals.

The book begins with the author's own childhood encounters. Diski describes some fairly somber memories (for example, taking home an injured bird with the intention of healing it, only to witness its death) and considers the ways in which animals are represented in cartoons, Disney films, and stuffed toys to be neotenized -- childlike, adorable, and therefore lovable to us (and, of course, less deadly to us than beasts in the wild).

"Neotony" is one of a few scientific terms highlighted in the book; "anthropomorphism" is another stand-out. A repeating idea in What I Don't Know About Animals is that whenever we experience or exploit animals, we reveal more about ourselves than about the animals in question. Despite our attempts to classify, our language only separates us from them further -- exacerbating the otherness of animals -- as we try to define what they mean to us. Diski writes, "What animals are to themselves is a question mostly left to philosophers to fail to come to a conclusion about." The author then expertly weaves together some animal-related arguments from Derrida, Darwin, Heidegger, and Levinas.

What I Don't Know About Animals also takes readers into zoos, scientific laboratories, and even a mental hospital, where we see how the living things that don't resemble us -- such as parasites and spiders -- can contribute to our own neuroses. Cat ladies and animal hoarders are also discussed in the animals-and-madness chapter, "Under Our Skin". Some of the author's most generous confessions appear here.

Readers also get a peek into traditional farming and factory farming, as Diski contemplates the (im)morality of both, along with that of vegetarianism, veganism, and eating meat while still appreciating animal companionship. Her subsequent summary of Temple Grandin's work with animals in the farming industry is especially interesting and raises some important questions: Can we know what's best for animals when we use them for our own benefit? How can we treat animals humanely when we use them for food, clothing, and financial benefit?

Ultimately, Diski herself doesn't know enough about animals to take a radical position on them -- on whether to eat them or not, or whether scientists should use them for research purposes. Her book does raise many fascinating questions, though.

With that said, perhaps not all readers will appreciate the gray-scale subtlety of this fine book. There's a depression that looms over it -- not necessarily a sadness, but an absence -- the lack of our ability to really know animals or share language with them, and the lack of a concrete conclusion to the book.

And I guess there's some sadness, too, along with the absence. Whereas Foer offers the youthful zest of a new husband and dad in Eating Animals, Diski laces her book with descriptions of a quiet, lonely life with her cat, Bunty, whom she can never really know, but whom she prefers over human company because at least she can return the cat's blank stare with affection. As the author notes, “Blankness can mean everything and nothing, after all.”

Diski's dry humor (which inspired me to write "ha!" in my margins more than a few times) and her thorough research on a seldom-explored topic will certainly capture readers' attention.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.