'The Ecstasy of Influence': Lethem and his WordHoard

Jonathan Lethem

Jonathan Lethem invites us to the ecstasy of intertextuality, to the intertwining of thousands of words with our selves. This guy is a great writer -- and a great reader.

The Ecstasy of Influence: Nonfictions, Etc.

Publisher: Doubleday
Length: 464 pages
Price: $27.95
Author: Jonathan Lethem
Publication Date: 2011-11

I don’t know if Michael Chabon or Jonathan Lethem is my favorite contemporary American writer, any more than I know if Amazing Adventures of Cavalier and Clay or Fortress of Solitude is my favorite contemporary American novel. A new collection of belles-lettres may sway me decisively toward Lethem.

But you don’t care, really, who my favorite novelist is. If you loved Motherless Brooklyn and found it revelatory or read the essay collection The Disappointment Artist, however, you give more than one damn about what turned Lethem from a kid from Brooklyn into a poet of modern marginalized art, interlocutor and celebrator of comic books, Star Wars and Phillip K. Dick.

Part of the answer, as several of these occasional pieces make clear, has to do with, well, being a kid from Brooklyn. But it also has to do with the ecstatic experiences of reading, the burrowing down deep into the interstices between genre fiction, great literature, film. And then bridging what appears to be deep chasms with the inexpressible yearnings that form most of our interactions with the world and the startling Others who inhabit it.

Lethem shows in one essay that it has to do with understanding why bookshops (or what we now call “the independent bookstore”) are worlds of impossible wonder; places whose basements might contain hidden treasures of forgotten word-hoards. It’s also maybe about being able to be the poet of Spider-Man and explain in a short essay, everything from the racial politics of the web-slinger to why films try too hard to adapt comic characters.

Lethem’s new collection, The Ecstasy of Influence, includes discussions of all of these ideas, not to mention an essay on what the film The Man who Shot Liberty Valance tells us about postmodernism and another that becomes extended meditation on James Brown. His title plays, of course, with Harold Bloom’s much-discussed notion of “the anxiety of influence.”. Lethem’s take on the question is plain in what he chooses to write about. The poets within the poets are not simple custodians of artistic integrity -- they are bacchanalian daemons and Lethem lets them loose to play.

Divided in ten sections, this is a book with more heft than Disappointment Artist and with some essays certain to become as classic as in his essay, "13, 1977, 21" where he explains all the reasons that he, and maybe his whole generation, felt compelled to go and see Star Wars 21 times. And be prepared if you know his essays primarily from the hundred and something page book Disappointment Artist. Ecstasy of Influence is a pretty massive tome, especially for an essay collection. It’s the product, Lethem admits, of a suddenly successful writer who didn’t know how not to say yes to everything for ten years. But what an amazing ten years of material.

Start anywhere. Like all good essay collections, you can meander off the path. The author even gives you a few suggestions about sections you might like and sections you might not. Many of us will rush straight to Lethem’s interview with Dylan or to read his reflections on Shirley Jackson or re-read his powerful New York Times piece on why America became obsessed with Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight in the midst of the War on Terror.

I would urge you not to skip too quickly the sections that don’t offer the promise of exploring your favorite pop culture obsession. Lethem opens with “My Plan to Begin With” which is both a reflection on what he wanted his book to be and what he wanted his life to be through a series of remembrances of his experiences as clerk in various bookshops.

And, whatever you do, don’t skip his short pieces on 9/11. Lethem manages in these to avoid both the easy moralisms and the gibbering uncertainties of that period, an amazing accomplishment since some of these were born in the immediate aftermath of the event. They express anxiety and relinquish all efforts to make sense of things through geopolitics and sentimentalism. And yet, they don’t declare the end of irony, the end of trying to make sense of a complex world, the end of the need to be the voice that speaks clearly amid a dull roar.

While Lethem avoids moralism, some readers (maybe not many, by now) will be surprised to learn he is a serious moralist and writes seriously about race, economic equality and the “War on Terror”. He would hate the phrase “serious moralist” and respond to being denominated as such with a fairly complex joke at my expense. This does nothing to quench the fire that comes out of his essay on Norman Mailer and why American culture decided to turn him into a joke and stop listening. Or how his discussion of subway graffiti gives voice both to marginalized art and to marginalized people. Or how his writings in the very immediate aftermath of 9/11 manage to demand that, as we crawled into our fetal balls of terror or up onto our soapbox of equal terror, we find some way, for God’s sake, to be human and to think.

Obviously there is much to love here and very little to disparage. There are times when the author drags us a bit far down into his own rabbit holes, both of language and of his own thought experiments. I say stay with him and you will find a new world opened up for you.

In one of my favorite essays, Lethem describes his writing process. He makes no outlines, no systematic notes that he uses to guide his characters through orphaned boroughs and hiding places for superheroes. He instead reads, reads a lot, and keeps a notebook where he tries to “accumulate shards of utterances, like a ransom note or an earl punk rock flyer.” He glues things, makes a kind of scrapbook. The books he gives us are a product of his reading and his friendships with books.

And this is the greatest thing about Ecstasy of Influence in the end. The author invites us to the ecstasy of intertextuality, to the intertwining of thousands of words with our selves. The guys a great writer but the guy’s also a great reader. Follow him down.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.